Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

On this episode of "The Federalist Radio Hour," RealClearInvestigations and RealClearPolitics writer Mark Hemingway joins Culture Editor Emily Jashinsky to discuss Time Magazine's article "The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election" and how it demonstrates the corporate media's bias in approaching the 2020 presidential election.
Hosted by Emily Jashinsky, with guest
Mark Hemingway
Discussion (3)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Great interview. Mark Hemingway is so sane. He and his wife and Byron York and a few others are on my (less than 10?!!) list of actual reporters and pundits I will almost always listen to.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Hemingway is such a xxx. "I never questioned the election results, and never will." "They just can't come out and say these things!"
Hemingway cares more about what they say than what they did. For the weak, it's always about what's said. At least until it affects them personally - then watch Mark do a 180. Betcha.
Edit: yeah, I take it back. But I thought it.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Remember, if you question the 2020 election you get blacklisted to some degree, and some people are more chicken than others. (I name no names.)
It is, of course, acceptable, even laudable to question the 2016 election and the 2000 election and, in general, any election won by Republicans.