The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowFederalist Radio HourNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourHillsdale DialoguesMadison’s NotesMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Podcasts/
  2. Federalist Radio Hour/
  3. John Abramson On Big Pharma’s Decades Of Corruption
February 8, 2022
Federalist Radio Hour•February 8, 2022The Federalist

John Abramson On Big Pharma’s Decades Of Corruption

Subscribe to Federalist Radio HourSubscribe

On this episode of "The Federalist Radio Hour," Dr. John Abramson, a lecturer of health care policy at Harvard Medical School, joins Federalist Culture Editor Emily Jashinsky to discuss his new book "Sickening: How Big Pharma Broke American Health Care and How We Can Repair It."

Hosted by Emily Jashinsky, with guest JAJohn Abramson

Discussion (2)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Boney Cole@BoneyCole·4y

    At the very end, he intimates that conservatives are anti-intellectual, and he clearly doesn’t want to be mistaken for such a benighted creature. He seems amazed that a conservative interviewer would listen patiently to what he has to say. He is extremely, but carefully, condescending.
    I would be interested to hear what he has to say about the New England Journal of medicine article which published an inaccurate statistic on vaccine related miscarriages, but was subsequently forced to retract the statistic. At this point, the time has long passed when they could have replaced the inaccurate statistic with an accurate one, but they have never done so, to my knowledge. What are they hiding, and why?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Boney Cole@BoneyCole·4y

    I have a request for Mr. Abramson. His qualifications are perfect or the investigation. Please

    New England Journal of Medicine, April 21, 2021

    Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid 19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.

    Please see Table 4, the category of “Spontaneous Abortion < 20 wks”. They publish a number of 104. They don’t publish a percentage. This is because the paper was published before some of the pregnancies were completed. Obviously, all the pregnancies tracked in the study are now completed. The pregnancies are part of a V-Safe data base. Can you access that data base and calculate that percentage? Thank you.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •