Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

On this episode of "The Federalist Radio Hour," Dr. John Abramson, a lecturer of health care policy at Harvard Medical School, joins Federalist Culture Editor Emily Jashinsky to discuss his new book "Sickening: How Big Pharma Broke American Health Care and How We Can Repair It."
Hosted by Emily Jashinsky, with guest JAJohn Abramson
Discussion (2)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
At the very end, he intimates that conservatives are anti-intellectual, and he clearly doesn’t want to be mistaken for such a benighted creature. He seems amazed that a conservative interviewer would listen patiently to what he has to say. He is extremely, but carefully, condescending.
I would be interested to hear what he has to say about the New England Journal of medicine article which published an inaccurate statistic on vaccine related miscarriages, but was subsequently forced to retract the statistic. At this point, the time has long passed when they could have replaced the inaccurate statistic with an accurate one, but they have never done so, to my knowledge. What are they hiding, and why?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have a request for Mr. Abramson. His qualifications are perfect or the investigation. Please
New England Journal of Medicine, April 21, 2021
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid 19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.
Please see Table 4, the category of “Spontaneous Abortion < 20 wks”. They publish a number of 104. They don’t publish a percentage. This is because the paper was published before some of the pregnancies were completed. Obviously, all the pregnancies tracked in the study are now completed. The pregnancies are part of a V-Safe data base. Can you access that data base and calculate that percentage? Thank you.