Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
3 Martini Lunch

Princeton & Racism, Mail-In Vote Loopholes, Biden’s Fracking Doublespeak

Subscribe to 3 Martini LunchSubscribe

Join Jim and Greg as they chronicle how Princeton University's self-flagellation over systemic racism launched a federal investigation into whether they should no longer qualify for taxpayer dollars. They also cringe as two swing states (and, yes, Nevada is one of them) create mail-in voting loopholes that erode confidence in the system. And they hammer Joe Biden for claiming to be for and against fracking in the same answer.

Hosted by Greg Corombos and Jim Geraghty

Discussion (5)

  • kedavis@kedavis

    Obama did oppose fracking, and certainly would have stopped it entirely except, as Jim pointed out, it was happening on private land. And he didn't quite get around to doing it illegally, by executive order.

  • Taras@Taras
    ReplyingtoArahant

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Obama did oppose fracking, and certainly would have stopped it entirely except, as Jim pointed out, it was happening on private land. And he didn’t quite get around to doing it illegally, by executive order.

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Good thing he couldn’t have another four years.

    Once again, Greg pulled Jim up short, when he gave Obama too much credit for “not screwing up” the fracking revolution.

  • Architectus@Architectus
    ReplyingtoTaras

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Obama did oppose fracking, and certainly would have stopped it entirely except, as Jim pointed out, it was happening on private land. And he didn’t quite get around to doing it illegally, by executive order.

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Good thing he couldn’t have another four years.

    Taras (View Comment):

    Once again, Greg pulled Jim up short, when he gave Obama too much credit for “not screwing up” the fracking revolution.

    Is this becoming another Hannity and Colmes? ;-)

  • Taras@Taras
    ReplyingtoArchitectus

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Obama did oppose fracking, and certainly would have stopped it entirely except, as Jim pointed out, it was happening on private land. And he didn’t quite get around to doing it illegally, by executive order.

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Good thing he couldn’t have another four years.

    Taras (View Comment):

    Once again, Greg pulled Jim up short, when he gave Obama too much credit for “not screwing up” the fracking revolution.

    Architectus (View Comment):

    Is this becoming another Hannity and Colmes? ;-)

    Remember, Jim Geraghty is always wrong — while Greg Corombos is wrong only most of the time. So naturally they must occasionally disagree.