Don’t Self-Impeach — You’ll Go Blind

This week on America’s most beloved political podcast, we get deep in the weeds on impeachment: can it happen, how would it work, and the politics surrounding it. But first, we travel to Venezuela where our intrepid correspondent Annika Rothstein, who tells a harrowing story that we won’t spoil here (yes, we know the audio on her segment was sub-par — socialists run lousy telecommunications operations. Go figure.). Then, if you want to understand a possible Constitutional crisis, you should ask a Constitutional law professor. Luckily, we have John Yoo on speed dial (kids, ask your parents what speed dial is). He delves into the legal ramifications of impeachment and contempt of Congress before he had to rush off to his next TV hit. Do read his Washington Post op-Ed for more detail. Finally, we wrap up with another edition of our “Handicap The Democratic Field” segment. Who’s up? Who’s down? Who’s going nowhere fast? We break it all down for you (spoiler alert: It’s been a bad few weeks for Beto).

Music from this week’s show: Matilda by Harry Belafonte

Subscribe to Ricochet Podcast in iTunes (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in iTunes or by RSS feed.

Please Support Our Sponsors!

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 20 comments.

  1. kedavis Member

    This “episode” still isn’t showing up in iTunes.

    • #1
    • May 10, 2019, at 5:41 PM PDT
    • Like
  2. Blue Yeti Admin

    kedavis (View Comment):

    This “episode” still isn’t showing up in iTunes.

    Looking into this right now.

    Update: it’s there now. 

    • #2
    • May 10, 2019, at 5:54 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  3. Arahant Member

    @annikahernrothrothstein, get out and stay out. Really. Go someplace safe, like Iraq or Chechnya or Ukraine/Crimea.

     

    • #3
    • May 10, 2019, at 6:00 PM PDT
    • 4 likes
  4. James Lileks Contributor

    I’m wearing an R because that’s my middle name.

    • #4
    • May 10, 2019, at 7:47 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  5. Arahant Member

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    I’m wearing an R because that’s my middle name.

    James Are Lileks? James Ricochet Lileks? James Ruh-Roh Lileks?

    • #5
    • May 10, 2019, at 7:55 PM PDT
    • 3 likes
  6. James Lileks Contributor

    Arahant (View Comment):
    James Are Lileks? James Ricochet Lileks? James Ruh-Roh Lileks?

    Beto.

    • #6
    • May 10, 2019, at 10:38 PM PDT
    • 5 likes
  7. kedavis Member

    The great economic numbers are fine, but we shouldn’t underestimate the ability of many people – voters – to believe they can vote for Democrats to take the current great (Trump) economy, swap in President Elizabeth Warren or President AOC, then ADD wonderful socialism and have things REALLY great! Of course they’re wrong, but you can’t convince them. And if they get their way, when things crater they’ll blame Republicans, somehow.

    • #7
    • May 10, 2019, at 10:46 PM PDT
    • 6 likes
  8. Arahant Member

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    James Are Lileks? James Ricochet Lileks? James Ruh-Roh Lileks?

    Beto.

    Might as well change your name on Ricochet to get that in there. 😜

    • #8
    • May 10, 2019, at 11:31 PM PDT
    • Like
  9. kedavis Member

    Arahant (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    James Are Lileks? James Ricochet Lileks? James Ruh-Roh Lileks?

    Beto.

    Might as well change your name on Ricochet to get that in there. 😜

    It’s James Arrrr on Talk Like A Pirate Day.

    • #9
    • May 11, 2019, at 12:09 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  10. Arnold Falk Member

    The conversation with Annika Rothstein made me think of several of the chapters in Churchill’s A History of the English-Speaking Peoples, particularly Chapters 28-30.

    What is curious to me, and I have looked at videos of recent OAS meetings, is why no concerted military action, or threat of action, has not been agreed by that organization. Venezuela is a cancer now to all the members of the OAS. And yet, even now, there appears to be no agreed plan.

    • #10
    • May 11, 2019, at 5:57 AM PDT
    • 4 likes
  11. Icarus213 Thatcher

    Heavy editing needs to be done right after minute 19.

    • #11
    • May 11, 2019, at 10:42 AM PDT
    • 2 likes
  12. Lance Member

    Zeroing in on a decade of podcasting and Peter still feels the need to clarify who he is to whom he is about to ask his last question. I’m sure it’s to facilitate the written record as much as to mitigate a potentially poor signal. Still, all these years and podcasts in, I can’t imagine anyone listening to him or participating in a conversation with him not recognize his voice.

    • #12
    • May 11, 2019, at 11:22 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  13. Blue Yeti Admin

    Icarus213 (View Comment):

    Heavy editing needs to be done right after minute 19.

    Weird, that was edited at one point yesterday. Second week in a row where that’s happened. May be time for new audio editing software. In any case, it’s been fixed now. Delete the current file and re-download for the repaired version. Thanks for the heads up.

    • #13
    • May 11, 2019, at 12:05 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  14. Mr. Michael Garrett Lincoln

    @James Lileks Thank you for keeping alive the correct use of “tenterhooks.”

    • #14
    • May 11, 2019, at 1:21 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  15. James Lileks Contributor

    Mr. Michael Garrett (View Comment):

    @James Lileks Thank you for keeping alive the correct use of “tenterhooks.”

    I also hoist by petard, not on it.

    • #15
    • May 11, 2019, at 7:25 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  16. Peter Robinson Founder

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Mr. Michael Garrett (View Comment):

    @James Lileks Thank you for keeping alive the correct use of “tenterhooks.”

    I also hoist by petard, not on it.

    Maybe this is the time to get this cleared up. What is a “petard,” anyway?

    • #16
    • May 11, 2019, at 7:32 PM PDT
    • Like
  17. Arahant Member

    Peter Robinson (View Comment):
    Maybe this is the time to get this cleared up. What is a “petard,” anyway?

    A bomb for blowing up gates and breaching walls.

    • #17
    • May 11, 2019, at 7:36 PM PDT
    • Like
  18. Arahant Member

    (Should I mention the word is related to the French term for fart, and therefore related to Le Pétomane?)

    • #18
    • May 11, 2019, at 7:38 PM PDT
    • Like
  19. James Lileks Contributor

    Arahant (View Comment):
    (Should I mention the word is related to the French term for fart, and therefore related to Le Pétomane?)

    You should, and if you can find another French theatrical hindquarter-emission impressionist who was name-checked in a Mel Brooks movie, name him!

    • #19
    • May 11, 2019, at 11:55 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  20. Arahant Member

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    (Should I mention the word is related to the French term for fart, and therefore related to Le Pétomane?)

    You should, and if you can find another French theatrical hindquarter-emission impressionist who was name-checked in a Mel Brooks movie, name him!

    Exactly. Great cultural relevance.

    • #20
    • May 12, 2019, at 12:29 AM PDT
    • Like