Many of The Federalist Papers bear the title, “The Same Subject Continued,” and with a lot of news about the Ukrainian situation coming out this week, we decided to continue last week’s vigorous argument over Ukraine with some of the new facts, such as how much of our own munitions inventory is being drawn down to supply Ukraine (see chart below), the decision to send Abrams tanks, the news that the Ukrainian government is “shocked, shocked” to discover gambling in the casino corruption in its ranks, to a bracing report from our friends at American Greatness that legacy sympathy for Nazism may be more extensive than thought. Also, what’s up with the high-profile life-fire exercises the U.S. and Israel just conducted?

Ukraine takes up most of this episode, but we do take time to ponder the disbarment crusade against John Eastman, the scandal over Fireball Cinnamon Whisky that apparently contains no whisky (or whiskey), though “cinnamon” should have been a clue that something is seriously amiss, and finally, was Steve really abducted by a UFO, or was that just anesthetic haze?

Exit music this week, appropo the Abrams tank news, is “Tank” by The Stranglers, soon to be hummed by Ukrainian tank drivers:

‘Cos I can drive (drive)My very own tankYes I can drive (drive)My very own tankYes I can drive (drive)My very own tank

Subscribe to Power Line in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

There are 14 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Leslie Watkins Inactive
    Leslie Watkins
    @LeslieWatkins

    My thought is that, more than any other reason, Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought Biden would let him get away with it. But now, the conflict has shown that Russia is not a major military power, but a Potemkin border wall hiding nothing but nukes, which I do not think Russians would let Putin get away with using against Ukraine. I personally find it morally sickening for us to basically sacrifice a population and a country for a proxy endeavor we refuse to fight in the name of weakening a military that is already weak. I think Congress should pass a bill or use whatever process is available to restrict the president from assisting foreign nations at war unless he says that U.S. boots on the ground is a possibility.

    • #1
  2. Dr.Guido Member
    Dr.Guido
    @DrGuido

    Milton Friedman relied on the phrase ‘enlightened self-interest’ and that seems to most certainly be the case that Lucretia makes.

    Additionally, I’ve discovered that even in such places like ‘Substack’ which are supposedly more tolerant of a range of opinions, asking certain pro-Ukraine folks about corruption and whether it is even being discussed in the (not-very) free Ukraine press can get one rapidly branded as slavishly pro-Putin.

    I am also surprised at how many of the once reliable ‘Don’t get involved in overseas adventures’ Leftists/Liberals are now among the most  gung ho pro-Zelenskyites out there.

    The accompanying chart provided today prompts me to ask John and his  like minded associates if they think there will be a ‘tell’ from Vlad if/when we have pushed him to the (no longer unthinkable) brink of him pushing the button? I am convinced that the intolerable legacy for him is not that he got merely stalemated in Ukraine but that he goes down as the (wannabe) new Czar who lost  Ukraine

    • #2
  3. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Leslie Watkins (View Comment):

    My thought is that, more than any other reason, Putin invaded Ukraine because he thought Biden would let him get away with it. But now, the conflict has shown that Russia is not a major military power, but a Potemkin border wall hiding nothing but nukes, which I do not think Russians would let Putin get away with using against Ukraine. I personally find it morally sickening for us to basically sacrifice a population and a country for a proxy endeavor we refuse to fight in the name of weakening a military that is already weak. I think Congress should pass a bill or use whatever process is available to restrict the president from assisting foreign nations at war unless he says that U.S. boots on the ground is a possibility.

    There is a bizarre line of reasoning I’ve seen, to the effect that abandoning the Ukrainians to their fate would be a favor to them!

    It would indeed be “morally sickening for us to basically sacrifice a population and a country” — by walking away.

    • #3
  4. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Dr.Guido (View Comment):

    Milton Friedman relied on the phrase ‘enlightened self-interest’ and that seems to most certainly be the case that Lucretia makes.

    Additionally, I’ve discovered that even in such places like ‘Substack’ which are supposedly more tolerant of a range of opinions, asking certain pro-Ukraine folks about corruption and whether it is even being discussed in the (not-very) free Ukraine press can get one rapidly branded as slavishly pro-Putin.

    I am also surprised at how many of the once reliable ‘Don’t get involved in overseas adventures’ Leftists/Liberals are now among the most gung ho pro-Zelenskyites out there.

    The accompanying chart provided today prompts me to ask John and his like minded associates if they think there will be a ‘tell’ from Vlad if/when we have pushed him to the (no longer unthinkable) brink of him pushing the button? I am convinced that the intolerable legacy for him is not that he got merely stalemated in Ukraine but that he goes down as the (wannabe) new Czar who lost Ukraine

    To those of us who remember the Cold War, what I call the “corruption scam” is very familiar.   Communists, and their supporters in the US, constantly used it to undermine support for friendly, anti-Communist governments.   (In reality, the Communist countries were the most corrupt of all, but writing or even talking about it would get you sent to a slave labor camp.)

    In perhaps the most egregious example, it was used to trick Harry Truman into not supporting our allies against Japan, the Chinese Nationalists, against Mao’s Communists (who had mostly sat out the war against Japan); even as Stalin supplied vast quantities of American munitions to the Communists.

    So you can see why knowledgeable people would get a little short with anyone who tries to pull the old scam against Ukraine.

    There’s also a wishful thinking (by Russia) element involved.   If only the Ukrainians had been selling American munitions like the Javelin on the black market, then Ukraine wouldn’t be littered with burnt-out Russian tanks.

    • #4
  5. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

     

    • #5
  6. Norm Hapke Jr. Inactive
    Norm Hapke Jr.
    @NormHapkeJr

    After listening to Lucretia, all I can say is repeat what she often says which is it was STUPID,STUPID,STUPID, just moronic, in what she said about Ukraine If we look back at Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, we can see that they were immeasurably more corrupt and dramatically less effective than Ukrainians have been. The money and equipment that we sent to them instead of our troops is the best money we have ever spent in the military, as it is destroying the Russians. Lucretia should stick to the federalist papers because she knows little besides conspiracy theories about what is happening in Ukraine.

    • #6
  7. LukeWVa Listener
    LukeWVa
    @LukeWVa

    Senator Machin is not a lawyer.

    • #7
  8. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Kamala

    https://twitter.com/rncresearch/status/1620136645868634115?s=61&t=BdxCQHZPYCnEEumJtME6oA

    • #8
  9. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

     

    In March 2022 Ukraine looked like a sure loser.   In January 2023 it looks like a winner.   Everybody wants to join a winning team.

    • #9
  10. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Taras (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    In March 2022 Ukraine looked like a sure loser. In January 2023 it looks like a winner. Everybody wants to join a winning team.

    They make a desert and call it peace. Tacitus could have been writing about the fruits of the wars our globalists are fighting.

    • #10
  11. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    In March 2022 Ukraine looked like a sure loser. In January 2023 it looks like a winner. Everybody wants to join a winning team.

    They make a desert and call it peace. Tacitus could have been writing about the fruits of the wars our globalists are fighting.

    You might as well say the American Revolution was about globalism.   Ukraine is fighting for national self-determination and against national obliteration.   Remember, Putin’s position is that those softies, Lenin and Stalin, were wrong to recognize the existence of Ukraine, which he does not.  

    To Putin, Ukrainians are just Russians who speak a corrupt, incomprehensible dialect of Russian and have a quaint, old fashioned attachment to democracy, from which they need to be cured so they can rejoin the glorious Russian volk.   Ukrainian Orthodox, Catholics, Protestants, and Jews must be brought back to the only true faith, the Moscow dominated Russian Orthodox Church.

    • #11
  12. NedDeLorme Coolidge
    NedDeLorme
    @NedDeLorme

    John Yoo proves yet again he should join the Democrat Party – when does his job on MSNBC start?

    • #12
  13. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Taras (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

     

    In March 2022 Ukraine looked like a sure loser. In January 2023 it looks like a winner. Everybody wants to join a winning team.

    The fog of war is thick, but it looks like Ukraine is running out of ammunition. https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-war-is-the-army-running-out-of-ammunition/a-64710592

    Gen. Milley needs to go back to fighting white rage.

    • #13
  14. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

     

    In March 2022 Ukraine looked like a sure loser. In January 2023 it looks like a winner. Everybody wants to join a winning team.

    The fog of war is thick, but it looks like Ukraine is running out of ammunition. https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-war-is-the-army-running-out-of-ammunition/a-64710592

    Gen. Milley needs to go back to fighting white rage.

    In spite of the title, the article actually concerns a potential shortage of artillery shells.

    • #14
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.