The Democrats: No Friends of Free Speech and the Constitution

Democrats and never-Trump Republicans assert that Trump must not be reelected because he threatens the Constitution. Peggy Noonan goes so far as to say, in her most recent WSJ column, that Kamala Harris should move to a more centrist position on a range of issues in order to improve her chances of winning, thereby negating Trump’s perceived threat to constitutional government.

The problem with this formulation is that the Democrats don’t much like constitutional government, and indeed don’t much like the Constitution itself. (And by "Democrats," I mean not only the Democrat officeholders and politicians but also the larger party, including the academics, bureaucrats, and media people who are the party’s ideologues and the beneficiaries of its policies and who think themselves entitled to be the kingmakers or prince-electors of America.)

For example, here is Hillary Clinton calling for Americans to be civilly or even criminally charged for ‘misinformation.’ Here is Kamala herself, asserting that Trump has lost his free speech privileges and that his Twitter account (this is from 2019) should be taken down…and expressing dismay that social media sites can speak directly to millions of people without any level of oversight. Tim Walz says, “There’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech...” the definitions of which, of course, he surely expects to be edited by people ideologically aligned with himself. Democrat Representative Jamie Raskin has been a leading figure in Congress opposing efforts to investigate and curtail massive censorship programs coordinated by the Biden administration.

Many academics and journalists—representing professions that are highly Democrat-aligned—have attacked the very foundations of free speech and constitutional government. For example: New York Times book critic Jennifer Szalai scoffs at what she calls “Constitution worship.” In another New York Times piece, titled “The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed,” two law professors (one from Harvard and one from Yale) call for America to “reclaim America from constitutionalism.” Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley law school, is the author of No Democracy Lasts Forever: How the Constitution Threatens the United States, published last month. There are more examples at the link.

Democrats have also called for expanding the membership of the Supreme Court, for purposes of what used to be called court-packing, and have been extremely tolerant of the "heckler’s veto." Indeed, often now, the thug’s veto to shut down speech which is considered Badthink.

This is not a matter of a few rhetorical excesses: there is clearly a very broad-based and multi-layered movement against free speech—and toward further centralization of power–among prominent and influential Democrats.

Particularly appalling: This presentation excerpt and slide, the presentation being given at Harvard and apparently authored by a professor at George Washington University. The phrase "Breaking Free from the First Amendment" reminded me of the young man who said, circa 1933: "We Germans are so happy. We are free of freedom."

As long as we have free speech, other problems can be corrected. When free speech is lost, the feedback loops of society are broken...and disasters can and will occur.