Become a member.Become a Ricochet member.
Looking for better conservative conversation? Join Ricochet for just $5/month. Think of it as your neighborhood bar: familiar faces, lively debate, and room for a different point of view. Plus: listen to most of our podcasts ad-free.












































Discussion (27)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Very much so. Translations can only go so far.
On a side note, I watched a presentation the other day where one scholar was also talking about the literary atmosphere in which the Gospels were presented. He was comparing passages in the Homeric epics to passages in the Gospels, especially Mark and Luke. It was obvious the authors had known the literature and were drawing parallels. Thus, knowing the language and the literary traditions brings out more richness than the language alone, and certainly more than a translation without context.
Likewise, George Lamsa, a native Aramaic speaker from the Middle East, also explained the culture that he came from and that was closely related to that of Jesus. It brings a lot of light to the subject.
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
All the points about knowing the original languages, and of understanding the literature and culture of both the Hebrews of the time and of the peoples and cultures that surrounded them are very valid. However, I am still grateful for the translation of the Bible into all the languages of the world. Selfishly, I am most grateful for the translation into English.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yup. Listening to or reading Messianic and Orthodox Jewish scholars commenting on the NT is also very enlightening. The "living water" discourse especially benefits from an understanding of the Hebrew language and Second Temple Judaism.
As for translation: I don't buy the "untranslatability" argument for any word or concept. There are words or phrases that are difficult to translate and require some circumlocation, sure. I do that all the time and have made quite a good living at it for most of the past 16 years. But utterly untranslatable? Nah. I don't buy it. The Welsh "hiraeth", some claim, is not adequately rendered by "homesickness". Fair enough, but it can be adequately rendered in English with "longing for home" or "longing for that which is lost". Dw yn gallus siarad Cymraeg, in case you were wondering. In any case, the idea that somehow that emotion cannot be conveyed in words in English, Dutch, German, Spanish, Norwegian, etc. is simply not true.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
There are some words in Chinese philosophy that don't translate very straightforwardly. A footnote or two will still clear up most of it.
And I'm not sure someone untrained and careless but reading the original would know what wu-wei means any better than a careful foreigner who relies on translation.
The sentence at the end of Analects Book 6 is subtle and probably has dozens or hundreds of different plausible translations in English. But there's no way of translating it as "Kill your parents," and every translation will probably at least hint that this is the Golden Rule here.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Oddly, I think I know what you're talking about. If it's what I think it is, the translation I saw was "That which you would not want another to do to you, do not to the other." - Does that read right?
You're seeing five of 27 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.