Bio

Please see “about me” at http://teejaw.com


This section of TeeJaw's profile is hidden.


People Following TeeJaw

This section of TeeJaw's profile is hidden.


Conversations TeeJaw is Following

This section of TeeJaw's profile is hidden.


Conversations TeeJaw has Started (21)

Display starting at 21 of 21 user conversations

TeeJaw's Profile

TeeJaw
Name:
TeeJaw
Hometown:
Jackson, Wyoming
Joined:
Nov 3, 2010

Recent Comments

TeeJaw
dash: Don't you think we'll be seeing more towns heading in this direction? From necessity if not ideology. · 2 minutes ago

Sadly, no.  Certainly not from ideology, and necessity will be resisted at all costs.  The experience of Weston, FL depends upon a level of enlightenment and resistance to the impulse to power not likely to be much repeated in the city halls of America.  Nor anywhere.

Edited on May 16 at 10:22am
TeeJaw

I believe professor Rahe’s comment is right.  Canada actually has 3 separate and unequal health care systems, two that are small and one very large.  First is the very good one for those with savvy and political connections; another for the wealthy who leave the country for their health care; and finally the really big one that has waiting lists, substandard care and death panels for the poor saps who lack knowledge, connections or money.

The population of Canada is 35 million, France’s 65 million, the U.K. about the same as France, and the U.S. is 310 million.  The problems of socialized medicine will be worse in the U.S. than in any of those countries by about the same proportion as its population is larger.

TeeJaw
OkieSailor: I do not believe the child on the Time cover is three years old. He looks double that age. · May 12 at 5:20am

I second that.  

The “mother” should be prosecuted as a pedophile. Time for child pornography. 

TeeJaw

So many questions.  Like, no other dentists you could go to?  Really?

That might be a question if what she did was a mere embarrassment or inconvenience without permanent harm.  This was a savage act of mayhem on a helpless victim over which she held a position of trust and, at that moment, absolute power.  

What other questions do you have?

TeeJaw

I have to drive in my car for about 2 hours of early-morning darkness on my regular trips between Jackson, WY and Denver.  The dark driving is treacherous because of animals on the road.  Hitting a large ungulate at anything over 30 mph can do a lot of damage and cause untold inconvenience.  Do you worry about that in your truck, or is your front bumper so sturdy it makes a moose, deer or elk strike inconsequential?

Click photo to enlarge.

Moose003
Moose002
TeeJaw

What should you, or anybody, be reading?  

I try to avoid telling anyone what they “should” do or read,  so I’ll just say that if you have not yet discovered Daniel Silva you are very lucky because you have about, who knows, 20 or 21  terrific and highly crafted mysteries to enjoy on the international intrigues of Gabriel Allon, master art restorer and secret operative for Mossad.  

Silva’s fictional plots are well researched for the factual details woven into them.   Anyone who enjoys a good story which informs as well as entertains will find much to like in Daniel Silva.

TeeJaw
Blue Yeti: We don't generally pre-announce guests, but I'll make an exception to let you know that Harry will be on the podcast next week. · 5 hours ago

Great! I look forward to it.

Edited on Apr 16 at 10:34pm
TeeJaw

This book seems to have arrived with propitious timing:

Screen shot 2012-04-16 at 10.22.26 AM

From the Amazon book description:

...telling the truth about racial profiling, crime, the social fallout of single parent homes, and the ways racial preferences distort the very meaning of equity and justice would mean facing up to the soul-destroying pathologies of urban black culture. 

In No Matter What . . . They’ll Call This Book Racist, Harry Stein attacks the rigid prohibitions that have long governed the conversation about race, not to offend or shock  but to provoke the serious thinking that liberal enforcers have until now rendered impossible. Stein examines the ways in which the regime of racial preferences has sown division, corruption, and resentment in this country. He pays special attention to the stifling falsehood that it is racism that continues to mire millions of underclass blacks in physical and spiritual poverty. by far the greater problem, says Stein, is the culture of destructive attitudes and behaviors that denies those in its grip the means of escape.

 All of us—and especially black people—for too long have been living with the terrible consequences of that cruel canard.

Edited on Apr 16 at 9:28am
TeeJaw
Fake John Galt: The problem is that to pratice principled conservatism you should be a principled conservative or at least know what one looks like. This leaves 95% of the national Republicans out, including Romney. · 48 minutes ago

Oh, come on.  It’s only 90% of Republicans.  

It takes more effort to be a principled conservative than  to be a “moderate” which usually means RINO.  It’s even easier to be liberal.  That’s why there are so many of them.  It’s harder to be a principled conservative because one must constantly defend it from attack by liberals who always have a mind-numbing slogan or pejorative word to ridicule you with [war against women, racist].  

Christie is proof that there’s a payoff for those willing to do the work.

TeeJaw
Aaron Miller: Democrats are always on offense.

They understand that there are only two positions you can occupy in politics:  offense or losing.  Republicans sometimes seem not to understand that the aggressor makes the rules in any conflict.

TeeJaw

Ethan Safron

Joseph Eagar: Derbyshire was fired because of the sheer vitriol of his piece (don't help black people in distress?) · 59 minutes ago

I'm a big Derb fan but I think you're on the money about how silly the Good Samaritan part was. He himself wrote this about "The Talk":

The misfortunes you can encounter by acting the Good Samaritan among blacks, for example, turn up in news stories at least weekly. (Here's one from last week.) 

2 hours ago

Silly?

Edited on Apr 15 at 10:53pm
Ducatista

Larry Koler

Peter Robinson

...

I fear that Mark Steyn is right in saying that Derb’s departure willfurther narrow the already narrow limits of acceptable debatein American intellectual life. The tumbrils are already rolling, with Elspeth Reeve at the Atlantic Wire denouncing Victor Davis Hanson on obscure grounds and calling for a campaign to drive “racist” writers from their jobs. ...

Just in time for the Obama racialists. They must be very happy with this. 

Repeat after me. The Democaratic Party:

  • is the party  of slavery.
  • is the party of the KKK.
  • is the party of Jim Crow laws.
  • was Bull Connor's political party of choice.

is the party that opposed Republican efforts to pass an anti-lynching law in the 1920’s and 1930s.

Ducatista
Ken Owsley: The real question, at the risk of sounding like a sexist, is this:  Why are conservative women always so dang beautiful, and liberal women are....well...not?   · 2 minutes ago

Maybe it’s because beautiful women can attract better men, who happen to be conservative.  The skanks have to settle for the metrosexuals and girly men.

Ducatista
Last Outpost on the Right: What are thereal odds of winning this seat?

The real odds are that Republicans have as little as a 4 in 10 chance of winning this seat.  Here how I got that.  There are 5.7 million registered Democrats and 3.4 million registered Republicans in the state.  It’s 37% R and 53% D. [ That’s splitting the independents equally between R and D vote.]  In order to have a 50% chance 1.4 million Democrats have to vote for the Republican, all of the Republicans have to vote for the Republican, and one-half of the independents have to vote for the Republican.

Anyone think that is going to happen?

On a more hopeful note, a whole lot of Democrats did vote for Turner in the Weiner district.

Edited on Apr 2 at 10:35am
Ducatista

On repealing Obamacare by reconciliation see The Reconciliation Option by James Capretta.

Ducatista

Not all, but most of Obamacare was passed using what our betters in Congress call, “reconciliation.”  It’s a procedure used for budget matters and the Democrats thought they had really outsmarted Republicans (never difficult to do)  since by this little trick the House version did not have to go to a full Senate vote requiring 60 votes to avoid a filibuster.  Scott Brown was in the Senate by then and had promised to be the 41st vote to sustain a filibuster which would have stopped Obamacare in its tracks.

But what passes with reconciliation can be repealed by reconciliation.  Thus, if the Republicans get even a slim majority in the Senate, keep the House, and if we have a President willing to support it and sign the bill, Obamacare, or most of it, can be repealed by a simple majority in the Senate.  If the Republicans fail in this they should lose every future election.

Romney cannot be trusted to stand up to the winds that will blow then.  Santorum is the best choice for president even if the only good thing about him is that he will support repeal and he will sign the bill.

Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In