Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The Two-Minute-and-Fifteen-Second Hate
Hollywood has a lousy record of late on live-action blockbusters purportedly based on ancient myth. I still have a bad taste in my mouth whenever I think of Troy (no, not that one; the Wolfgang Petersen trainwreck). And the last Hercules movie was apparently so dishonest that it undid the fantastic choice of putting Dwayne Johnson in a lion-skin cowl.
Gods of Egypt, however, looks so unabashedly silly, unserious, and inauthentic to its source material — if such a thing exists in this context — that taking it seriously at all seems like a guaranteed way to waste your time and ruin some mindless fun.
I mean, watch:
However, judgement and a sense of fun never get in the way of the racial grievance lobby. They have successfully forced the film’s director and studio ritualistically to confess to the crime of “whitewashing” the film by casting a Scot and a Dane in the lead roles, along with a bevy of other generally pale-faced actors:
[Director] Alex Proyas: “The process of casting a movie has many complicated variables, but it is clear that our casting choices should have been more diverse. I sincerely apologize to those who are offended by the decisions we made.”
Lionsgate: ”We recognize that it is our responsibility to help ensure that casting decisions reflect the diversity and culture of the time periods portrayed. In this instance we failed to live up to our own standards of sensitivity and diversity, for which we sincerely apologize. Lionsgate is deeply committed to making films that reflect the diversity of our audiences. We have, can, and will continue to do better.”
After finishing your derisive guffaws — take your time, enjoy — consider how patently absurd this is. First, the movie’s setting is fantastic, and the Egypt it’s depicting has precisely no relationship to any real Egypt that’s ever existed; heck, it’s relationship to Egyptian myth seems to be of the kind that makes Marvel’s Thor films appear scholarly, meticulous, and constrained. Second, Gerard Butler and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau aren’t playing Egyptians, but the gods Set and Horus, who are generally depicted as having the heads of animals. Third — and this is the really odd bit — what are we to make of the casting of Chadwick Boseman and Elodie Yung, both of whom are featured in the trailer and in the movies’ promotional posters but … neither of whom are exactly white, nor precisely Egyptian. Indeed, the discriminating principle in the casting seems not to be whiteness, but stunning gorgeousness.
Gods of Egypt gives every hint it will be gaudy, mindless, fun without any presence of self-importance or “authenticity” — whatever that might mean in this context.
This February, do yourself a favor: See what looks like a gloriously silly popcorn flick, and annoy a Leftist agitator.
Published in Culture, Entertainment
Why get your knickers in a twist over a movie that virtually nobody is gonna actually watch?
Once again, it’s the old “Parents Protesting A Marilyn Manson Concert” scenario. The only press this dud of a movie’s gonna get is the entirely artificial “controversy”. Don’t participate!
Take Paul Anka’s advice:
THIS! IS! EGYPT!!
Butler can’t seem to shake the mythological typecasting, which started long before 300 when he did a pretty dang decent job portraying Beowulf:
Tom, if this turns out to be a 10 megaton bomb, can I send you a bill for my evening?
That seems only fair, especially considering how hard you tried to talk me out of Prometheus.
I’ll be charging my usual exorbitant hourly rate, Tom, so open up that checkbook.
You didn’t try to talk me out of Prometheus. You monster.
Was the current Broadway musical Hamilton “brownwashed” because the producers casted* the play with African-American and Hispanic actors?
There has been a trend in recent years toward color-blind casting. One of the first times I was exposed to the concept was when I saw a Shakespeare play in NYC’s Central Park and was surprised to see siblings played by actors of different races. It was distracting at first, but I am not opposed to the practice, the application of which should be decided by the producers.
It seems, though, that color-blind casting only works one way. We’re supposed to accept it, except when certain quarters find it unacceptable.
The left really needs to get its stories straight. For example, if Syrian refugees are just like the Pilgrims, is that an insult or a compliment?
The rapid capitulation by the director and studio is the type of behavior that only makes matters worse – analogous to the craven acts by college administrators when confronted by “liberal fascist” students. Why not say, “We try to cast films in as color-blind a way as possible, and this film does in fact have a diverse cast.” Just leave it at that.
*Yes, I said “casted” and not “cast”. I like clarity of language.
But that’s completely different! Because… well, it’s … you know… umm ….
Come to think of it, there weren’t too many tuners-of-color in Dark City.
It’s nice to see Gerard Butler working again. That guy can never get a break.
Troy was horrible. I was doing a Classics program when that came out and some exclamations in the department I remember:
As long as it doesn’t boast of being anything historical, I’ll be able to appreciate and enjoy Gods of Egypt for what it is.
We appear to have been thinking precisely along the same lines. The Sword of Troy was a particularly painful moment.
WOW! What a bizarre CG mess!
Good luck with that one… color of skin appears to be the least of this movies ‘issues’.
I do not understand this hatred of Troy. There are dozens of versions of the story of the Trojan War, not just the Illiad. Even the Illiad is largely concerned with the question of Achilles’ rage, and how it consumes his life, but even then it inserts bunches of stories that have nothing to do with that because listeners of the time wanted to hear the cool parts.
Listeners of today want to see the Trojan Horse, the filmmakers wanted to focus on Achilles’ rage. Moving Achilles’ death to the end of the film, and contrasting the burning of Troy with the final quenching of Achilles’ rage (followed by death) is a perfectly valid way to tell the story.
Peter O’Toole’s turn as Priam was heartrending -“You are my enemy now” was delivered with excellent conviction. “Have you no honor?!”
People want to see Odysseus for the same reason they want to see the Horse -for the same reason they wanted to hear lists of warriors who get one line and then die in the original epic.
De gustibus non disputandum, I guess. I thought they did a great job of it.
The Illiad is not Troy, and Troy is not the Illiad, and regardless The Illiad is ten stories strung together, it is virtually unfilmable as anything other than a LOTR style epic. Which would be cool.
Ancestral swords never appear in myth?
Another vote for Troy, at least within the context of screen epics. I was pleasantly surprised by the acting, particularly Eric Bana, although I’ll admit to a preference for scene-chewing (see the Agamemnon character). Horner was not a good (second) choice for the score, but at least he apparently tried to make up for it by plagiarizing some very good composers who weren’t around to complain (e.g., Britten).
He was definitely the best part of the movie.
And clearly, the problem was casting Sean Bean in a role where he lives to the end credits. Much like the Spamalot line about you won’t succeed on Broadway if you don’t have any Jews, you can’t have a good movie where Sean Bean lives to the end credits.
This is my favorite:
For those of us translating the Iliad at the time, the question was, “Why are they giving us this ‘Sword of Troy’? We want the Shield of Achilles!”
Speaking of Thor, I’d lay a bundle of cash that the people demanding a culturally correct cast for Gods of Egypt were yelling “It’s just a movie!” when audiences went “Uh, why is a black guy playing a Norse god?”. Bet they have no problem making Jimmy Olson a black guy on Supergirl, either. Bet they also thought making Idris Elba James Bond was just a fabulous idea. Cultural appropriation!
The Iliad would be a snoozefest. Mostly Achilles crying about being slighted and the gods mucking about behind the scenes and peeing in each others’ shoes.
But where is the Odyssey? Phenomenal story, loads of interesting adventures. Super cool and clever protagonist Odysseus. Bad to the bone female lead Penelope. The made for TV mini series from the 90’s wasn’t too bad if I remember correctly, but I am afraid to watch it again.
Two of my favorite old literature stories the Odyssey and Gulliver’s Travels only made for tv in the 90’s, meanwhile modern day garbage like the Hunger Games gets the full budget.
My memory of the Iliad seemed to be that most of it involved Greeks and Trojans chopping each others limbs off for ten years without much of a break in between the fighting. I especially liked the details telling you who sliced off what limb, and where it went flying.
Well, a few weeks of a 10-year-long war.
First time I read it, I was downright amazed at the level of violence. By which I mean, I absolutely ate it up.
I hate violence. That’s why I read it in the original Greek. I didn’t understand a word.