Tag: Thomas Sowell

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. The Wit and Wisdom of Thomas Sowell

 

Thomas-Sowell“Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good.”

“The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics.”

“[T]he bottom-line message of multiculturalism [is that] members of minority groups that lag educationally, economically, or otherwise are to continue to behave in the future as they have in the past – and, if they do not get the same outcomes as others, it is society’s fault.”

Member Post

 

I haven’t listened to the most recent flagship podcast, but it is a lovely coincidence that Thomas Sowell is the guest. His book Race and Culture was a lifeline for me in graduate school. It was the fall of 1997. I was in the second year of my doctoral program in psychology, my fourth year […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

That was the nickname of Tom Seaver, the major-league pitcher. Before that, it was the name of a children’s cartoon. 31JfFxqJy9L._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_In any case, it certainly applies to Thomas Sowell, the economist, philosopher, and writer. His latest book is Wealth, Poverty and Politics: An International Perspective.

With Jay, he talks about some of the key questions of that book, and of life: what makes individuals and peoples rich or poor; whether equality of income is important; what the link is between prosperity and the rule of law.

Member Post

 

Thomas Sowell gets it right on John Boehner and Republican non-communication in this article. Boehner isn’t the only one. The refusal to communicate is party and movement wide. Here are two excerpts from Sowell’s article (emphasis mine): Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Save or Kill – Ricochet Edition

 

save or killThis past weekend, I did a pop-culture post based on a game Collider uses on its website called “Save or Kill.” The premise is that you are presented with two icons, both threatened with being wiped from existence forever, and must choose which of the two to save; you cannot save both. The game works best when you really love both icons, so it becomes a real Sophie’s Choice.

That first post didn’t get as many responses as I’d hoped — though my thanks to those who did participate, and there’s still time to jump in! — so I’m tailoring the game in this post with options better-suited to the interests of the Ricochetti.

So, read the list of the choices below and — in the comments — post which of the two icons you’d save for each of the ten choices. There’s no obligation to explain your reasoning, but I think it’ll be more fun with it. The criteria you use for judging is entirely up to you: you can do this based exclusively on personal preference, or on which option you feel is more important to society. Also, if you’re not familiar with both options in a scenario, feel free to abstain from that particular scenario.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Charges of Micro-aggression are Examples of Micro-totalitarianism

 

Thomas Sowell In his NRO piece today, Thomas Sowell provides a brilliant and powerful response to the “micro-aggression” meme that is sweeping our nation’s college campuses. Sowell contends that answering a comment or idea with charges of “micro-aggression” is nothing more than an attempt to shut down discussion without having to provide a reasoned counter-argument. Worse, such charges imply that one’s opponent is guilty of a form of “verbal violence” that might justify actual violence in response.

The concept of “microaggression” is just one of many tactics used to stifle differences of opinion by declaring some opinions to be “hate speech,” instead of debating those differences in a marketplace of ideas. To accuse people of aggression for not marching in lockstep with political correctness is to set the stage for justifying real aggression against them.

Sowell makes a convincing case that those wielding these accusations are themselves guilty of “micro-totalitarianism.” His descriptive label vividly lays bare this shameful attempt at thought control – the left’s demonization of, and in some cases criminalization of, dissent.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Bring Back the Trivium!

 

Some valid inferences in categorical logic. Long live the Trivium!The world is a complicated place; it’s hard to trace all the world’s problems back to their few root causes. But surely a lack of education is one of them–and, sad to say, a presence of miseducation. To be precise: A lack of good education is one of the root problems.

So what makes a good education? I was raised with the idea that Reading, ‘Riting, and ‘Rithmetic were fundamentals in education, and I don’t disagree with that now. The Lost Tools of Learning by Dorothy Sayers was a wonderful discovery in college. It turns out that there are some other fundamentals, the lost tools of the Trivium: grammar, dialectic, and rhetoric–or language, logic, and rhetoric. This is the old way of doing education. One of its surviving relics is the term “grammar school.” (Also, alongside the old and broken, yet newfangled, education system, a renewed, yet ancient and time-tested, education system has sprung up on this model–largely because of the influence of Sayers’ essay [examples here and here].)

The Trivium system relies largely on patterns. The patterns of Latin: sumesestsumusestissunt; oasatamusatisant; and others (so many others!). The patterns of Logic: All M are P; all S are M; therefore all S are P; and others.