Tag: Marriage

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Let Us Gawk at the Weird

 

shutterstock_156039962Marriage may be one of the more contentious issues around here, but I think the particulars described in this NYT piece about the marriage habits of the fabulously wealthy of Manhattan should unite the Ricochetti in fascinated condescension:

It was easy for me to fall into the belief, as I lived and lunched and mothered with more than 100 of them for the better part of six years, that all these wealthy, competent and beautiful women, many with irony, intelligence and a sense of humor about their tribalism (“We are freaks for Flywheel,” one told me, referring to the indoor cycling gym), were powerful as well. But as my inner anthropologist quickly realized, there was the undeniable fact of their cloistering from men. There were alcohol-fueled girls’ nights out, and women-only luncheons and trunk shows and “shopping for a cause” events. There were mommy coffees, and women-only dinners in lavish homes. There were even some girlfriend-only flyaway parties on private planes, where everyone packed and wore outfits the same color.

Strange, yes, but ways one might expect. But then we get to this section:

Member Post

 

And I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, the incident occasioned congratulations from several friends and family members. On the other hand, I have been insulted and I feel a slight urge to respond. Here’s the insulting paragraph: Heritage recently publicized the claims of “100 scholars” attacking marriage equality. Almost without exception, the “scholars” […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Husband Husbandry

 

shutterstock_237586651We’ve been talking a lot about marriage and divorce around here lately. As someone who’s been married for almost 13 years with some very rough spots along the way, I feel like this is a topic about which I can speak authoritatively. In particular, I’d like to talk about a duty that primarily — though by no means exclusively — falls to wives: ego management.

I like to nap in my car over lunch, particularly during lovely weather like we’ve had lately in Kansas City. As I was trying to drift off Thursday afternoon, I heard a woman screaming into her phone. She was informing her husband in a vulgar fashion that his family hated her for no reason, she hated them, and that — while it was his responsibility to defend her — he was refusing to because he lacked testicular fortitude. I was sorely tempted to scream back in an equally vulgar fashion that if she wanted her husband to have testicles, she should stop performing double orchidectomy surgery.

The temptation to state that complex problems have in fact simple solutions is always present, but my life experience has taught me that a simple solution to many marriage challenges is proper ego management of one’s spouse. No matter how frustrated, how annoyed, how angry one may be with him, tearing him down is never the solution. The dishes will not get washed or the baby changed if he feels he cannot meet her standards. Resumes will not be sent out and job interviews will be wastes of time if he feels like a failure. If he feels like he has to ask permission for every penny, he will be far less inclined to work as hard or may spend extravagantly on the theory of “might as well earn my tongue-lashing.” And without feeling attractive to his wife, the marriage bed will be a place of frustration and disappointment.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Where Have All the Cowboys Gone? Or, Reasons Why I’m Still Single

 

shutterstock_86562538The other day, my sister-in-law commented on an article her friend posted on Facebook titled “Why Men Won’t Marry You.” Naturally, my ears perked up. Yes, I would like to know why I’m still single at my age. Please, Fox News article, tell me!

The arguments laid out are similar to those a member posted on the Ricochet Facebook page that caused quite the, um… stir. The author of the Fox News article makes a more compelling, less rude case for the decline in marriage rates, and breaks it down into two main reasons:

  1. Because, why not? With premarital sex not only having become commonplace but even expected, why buy the cow when you can get a gallon of 2% for free by the second or third date? Most of my friends think it’s not only weird, it’s folly to wait until engagement or marriage to have sex.
  2. What’s in it for men? Citing punitive, husband-hating divorce settlements so easily come by — especially in “no fault” states — men have an increasing fear of losing everything they’ve worked for. According to the article, marriage rates are way down in England and America — the lowest since 1895. The protesting party in this anti-marriage sit-in are usually the men, and I can certainly attest to that with my own dating experience.

Since moving back to Nashville from New York, in an attempt to steer clear of the charming sleazeballs I had dated in my early- to mid-20s, I vowed to only date men with a kind heart and a strong Christian faith. And I’ve done just that — over and over and over. In the past five years, I have been shocked by how many wonderful, smart, kind, morally centered men there are out there; men who would make wonderful husbands and fathers.

Member Post

 

Marriage itself is a frequent subject here in Ricoland. We poke and prod at what it means today, what it meant in the past, “Traditional Marriage”, “Same Sex Marriage”, whether children are better off being raised by married parents, etc. What we have avoided, however, is Divorce. Sure, we condemn it, we condemn the consequences […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

Words matter. The current matter before the Supreme Court depends on one word, marriage. All other arguments are illogical, irrational and not based in reason. Premise – the state has an interest in defining the limits of what constitutes a union between those individuals who wish to bind themselves in a family unit relationship. To promote […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

It really is just that simple for most conservatives opposed to SSM, I suspect. It’s certainly true for me. Marriage and the laws surrounding it have to do with family formation (and, unfortunately, on occasion, dissolution), not affirming the romantic relationships among adults. Most conservatives opposed to SSM harbor no animus to gays or gay […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

Quite a trick, isn’t it? It seems to infuriate some people that we insist that we should describe SSM as redefining marriage. Why? Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

In 1995 the first presidency of the LDS church issued a Proclamation on the Family. It was intended to remind church members about the theological significance of family and to delineate familial duties and responsibilities. As a proclamation, it was also intended to inform the world what marriage means within the Mormon community and, I […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Selma Envy

 

SelmaHeschelMarchI was never in the military; I was in the last draft class that sent people to Vietnam, but my draft number was 275, so I wasn’t called. Rush Limbaugh likes to recount the story of how Bill Clinton regretted that 9/11 happened on his successor’s watch, thus depriving him of the opportunity to show true leadership.

I say this to make the point that as we look back, we sometimes wish that we could put ourselves into today’s events in such a way as to allow us to be cloaked in the more forgiving glow that the passage of time has given to events that were so raw at the time. Unfortunately, there are also those who will use the glow of past events to shine a light upon things that they can’t justify with reason:

“Why do so many young adults paint absurd caricatures of Christians who request government protection of their religious freedoms, arguing their true goal is to ban gay men from sitting at the local lunch counter?… Why do so many people, Gen Xers and younger, invent a monster of anti-gay bigotry and keep screaming the monster is real despite a mountain of contrary facts standing before them?”

Member Post

 

Part One of this series is located here. How savvy are you about step-families? Do you understand the structural similarity between step-families and same-sex marriage? Take the Step-Family Quiz to test your knowledge.  Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

Ted Cruz made the following statement during the speech he gave announcing his candidacy for president at Liberty University: Instead of a federal government that works to undermine our values, imagine a federal government that works to defend the sanctity of human life and to uphold the sacrament of marriage… Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Why Would a 43-Year-Old Man Like “Married at First Sight”

 

My wife and I don’t watch much TV. Last year we cut the cord and now use Roku and Apple TV to occasionally watch movies and shows through services like Netflix and Hulu. This past fall, missing out on NFL broadcasts, we bought the cheapest cable package just so we could get our local D.C. broadcast channels and ESPN.

The cable package comes with a handful of other channels that we never watch. This past Tuesday, after watching the one show we both love (“Jeopardy” — yes we’re nerds) I started randomly scrolling through the other channels.

Member Post

 

A couple of weeks ago, couture fashion designers Dolce and Gabbana gave an interview to an Italian magazine. In that interview (excerpted here by the UK Daily Telegraph, by way of TruthRevolt), the two homosexual designers expressed their view that the nuclear family of a married man and woman was the best for raising children. […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Ask Amelia: Mothers-in-law and Food Frustrations

 

AskAmelia3It’s Friday and Amelia Hamilton is here to answer your questions on life, love, and sweet tea.

Dear Amelia,
My mother-in-law drives me nuts. What should I do?
Signed,
Every Husband Who Ever Lived

Dear Husband,
You maybe should have signed that “every married person,” as I also hear this regularly from the wives. By now everyone should know that when they marry a person, they marry that person’s family. Healthy boundaries are important in all relationships, including yours with your mother-in-law and your wife’s with her mother.

Member Post

 

I am pleased to see that the community of natural marriage defenders is taking notice of kids in gay households: Dear Gay Community: Your Kids Are Hurting Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Marriage: What’s in a Definition?

 

shutterstock_133378736When my youngest child was in kindergarten, we were talking with him one day about what he’d learned at school. We soon realized that he had misunderstood his teacher when she taught the class about coin values. When we explained the true coin values, he became very upset because he thought his teacher had misinformed the class and was worried that he could not trust his teacher. He instinctively understood that if he incorrectly defined the values of pennies, nickels, dimes, and quarters, he could never hope to understand the larger monetary system. He had to rely on the basics he was learning in kindergarten to be his building blocks for all the other, more complicated things he would learn in the future.

The definition of marriage is a basic understanding that permeates all of society and the way we define any number of other words. When understood as a permanent sexual union of a man and woman and any children born to them, it keeps in place many crucial concepts that allow humans to flourish.

On the most basic level, it assumes two genders–male and female–with different names for each within marriage, husband and wife. That there are different names for the male and female roles does not require differentiated behavior, but indicates at least that men and women are different, that role differentiation and division of labor might (and generally has) been a component of marriage, and that men and women each have something unique to contribute to the union.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Reckoning with Divorce

 

We’ve had a pair of gay marriage posts this week on the Member Feed [Editor’s note: Curious? Join!], and there have been a few comments along the lines that Christians focus all their anger on gays, and similarly comments about the easy forgiveness of heterosexual sexual sins. These comments bothered me, but I don’t want to hijack those threads.

In the 20 years or so since I’ve been an active member of congregational churches (yes, those of you doing the math, I started when I was about 10 years old; being a voting member is a matter of salvation and understanding of the doctrine through baptism, not age), and I’ve seen sexual sins brought up a number of times. Almost always heterosexual, and almost always aimed at fornication and adultery (with the balance being about how married people should have sex more frequently).

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Split-Religion Marriages and Conversions

 

When I was a young teenager, my dad got pulled into the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults when a neighbor asked my dad to sponsor him through the process of conversion. The man’s wife was Catholic, so he was considering the Church’s beliefs with charitable patience. My father has participated in RCIA ever since, in varying capacities.

These days, one of his favorite TV programs is The Journey Home in which host Marcus Grodi interviews converts to Catholicism about their conversion experiences. Baptists, Lutherans, Mormons, Jews, housewives, lawyers, scientists, preachers — The show is fascinating because of the endless variety of origin stories, which provide insights and nuances which cradle Catholics like myself often have never considered.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. The Love Right in Front of Your Nose

 

gvalentinesmallThe summer that I was 21 and home from college, I went to see the musical comedy She Loves Me at our local community theater. I went with my parents. I was completely unattached, having only been on a handful of awkward dates in my life. My folks liked comedies and I loved theater. I had acted in and painted sets for many shows at this converted barn-playhouse since I was in high school.

You might know She Loves Me even if you don’t recognize its title. It was first a straight play, and then the basis for the 1940 movie The Shop Around the Corner with Jimmy Stewart and Margaret Sullavan; the musical stage show was written in the ‘60s, and it was even recycled a few years ago for the movie You’ve Got Mail. The original story was about a young man and woman who met working in a gift shop in Budapest in the 1930s and instantly disliked each other; but they each had a penpal to whom they wrote, not really knowing his and her correspondent’s true identity. The charming twist of course was that they were unwittingly writing to, and becoming very fond of, each other in the course of their letters. But they continued to snipe and snap at each other at work until they came to realize they were really in love.

The show was delightful, full of disarming characters, sweet songs and a plot — like most musical comedies — that could never happen in real life. I remember the shopgirl jumping up on her bed, clasping a letter to her chest, and singing about her romantic secret love, as well as the plodding old shop clerk who warbled philosophically about the huge universe and how he was just one little speck in it. A high school friend of mine played the delivery boy who rode a bicycle helter-skelter onto the stage when you’d least expect it – this was a theater-in-the-round, so the people sitting on the aisles jumped every time he sped up the ramps, ch-ch-chinging his bike bell. There’s a slapdash scene in a restaurant, with a scatterbrained headwaiter trying to maintain a ‘r-r-r-r-romantic’ atmosphere: he trilled his R’s as he crashed from table to table, knocking over vases and almost spilling wine on all the patrons. And there’s the charming moment at the end when the young clerk — who has figured out this shopgirl has been his love all along — reads a ‘secret’ penpal letter to her out loud and she realizes she has been so silly and blind not to see the love right in front of her nose.