Tag: Free Speech

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. This Probably Counts as a Macroaggression

 

Christina Hoff Sommers is probably the sharpest writer and thinker on modern feminism that we have on our side of the fight — which means that she must be resisted and declared an Enemy of the People.

When Sommers went to speak to a group of Republican and Libertarian students at Oberlin College last month, a coalition of fragile porcelain dolls concerned students posted — I am not making this up — “A Love Letter to Ourselves” (probably a serviceable title for any document produced by this cohort), calling Sommers a “rape denialist” because she has questioned the assertion that one in five women on college campuses have been sexually assaulted (Yes, it did include trigger warnings).

Member Post

 

I took a chance and returned to the park bench where I recently encountered an intensely loyal Hillary supporter and her gang – no really ;-). The park was relatively quiet. The ducks were happy to see me again and waddled up in anticipation of helping me finish my sandwich. It had been overcast and […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Nature of Defiance

 

MuhammadThere is an argument about Pamela Geller’s cartoon contest, favored by Bill O’Reilly as well as by many garden variety liberal pundits, that goes like this:

Of course the right to free speech is sacred and the murderers who wish to infringe on that right are vile criminals. Our vigor in the defense of free speech, however, (equally obviously) does not mean that we agree with the speech we are defending. The cartoons that Geller assembled are insulting to 1.5 billion, predominantly peaceful Muslims around the world. We can judge Geller offensive or (as Bill O’Reilly does) “stupid” for deliberately mocking the religion of the benign majority just in order to taunt the violent minority.

I can embellish this argument.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Fight Like Hell for the Right to Draw Muhammad…Then Choose Not to

 

“Words are like eggs dropped from great heights; you can no more call them back than ignore the mess they leave when they fall.”– Jodi Picoult

Let’s get something straight up front. For every terrorist attack, the blame belongs with the attackers. I don’t blame Reagan for the Beirut bombing in 1983, I blame the terrorists. I don’t blame Clinton for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, I blame the terrorists. I don’t blame Bush for 9/11 or Obama for the Boston Marathon bombing. I blame the terrorists.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The First Amendment for Dummies

 

Most of us have some ritual to help bring us to full alertness in the morning. Since it is not socially acceptable to run an IV drip of caffeine directly into your blood stream, most people settle on coffee as their delivery method. I prefer a shot of adrenaline in the morning courtesy of the rage induced by reading the left-wing commentariat.

Take this morning as an example. The left has never been particularly fond of the Bill of Rights, but usually avoids blatant calls to abridge First Amendment protections on speech. Not today. The LA Times, for example, is wondering where free speech ends and hate speech begins. For the Time’s edification, I have included a handy Venn diagram. The yellow circle represents hate speech, and the blue circle represents the applicability of free speech protections.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Libertarian Podcast: “Hollywood, Washington, and Transparency”

 

Are some companies so powerful that the public should have a right to know about their internal deliberations? That’s the argument WikiLeaks offered up when they decided to publish the entire archive of the Sony emails that were hacked last year. In this episode of The Libertarian podcast, Professor Epstein looks at the legal recourses that are available when information that was intended to stay private goes public; the limits of First Amendment protections for people who’ve stolen privileged information; and what it means to live in a world where your every e-mail could someday be newspaper fodder. Listen in below or subscribe to The Libertarian via iTunes or your favorite podcasting app.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. A Safe Space for Free Speech

 

WRMC3o0uI’ve made a concerted effort of late to avoid falling into the trap of believing that the current generation of young people is any more problematic than young people of the past. History is replete with examples of elders lamenting the inferiority of their progeny. If every generation were truly more worthless than the last, society would have come crashing down long ago. Determined to break me of this best practice are the editors of Georgetown University’s school paper, The Hoya.

In a piece that is nearly indistinguishable from a recent Onion parody, the editors explain that though college should be a place to promote free expression and a plurality of views, those views really should be in line with the consensus as they see it. The malefactor whose presence sparked this piece is none other than traitor to her gender and serial safe-space violator, Christina Hoff Sommers.

Giving voice to someone who argues that statistics on sexual assault exaggerate the problem and condemns reputable studies for engaging in “statistical hijinks” serves only to trigger obstructive dialogue and impede the progress of the university’s commitment to providing increased resources to survivors.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Two Acts of Free Speech

 

A bit over a week ago, some pupils at Valdosta State University engaged in a protest centered on walking and stomping on the US flag — a flag Americans have been maimed and have died defending, a flag symbolizing the very freedom of speech that allows protesters to desecrate the flag as part of their protest.

Yes, desecrating our flag is a despicable act, but that’s what gives power to a protest of this sort. The act is an expression of political speech, and it is legitimately protected as such.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Must Read: University Ex-Admin Alleges She Was Pressured to File False Harassment Claim Against Faculty Critic

 

Ever since FIRE launched its Stand Up For Speech Litigation Project last summer, I have been telling everyone to keep an eye on the Chicago State University case. And last week, we were able to learn a little more about why the Chicago State administration needs more public scrutiny. As the Chicago Tribune reports:

The president of Chicago State University tried to pressure a high level administrator to file false claims of sexual harassment against an outspoken professor to help the college try to silence him, according to court documents filed Thursday as part of an ongoing lawsuit. In a sworn statement, LaShondra Peebles, the college’s former interim vice president of enrollment and student affairs, said before she was fired that President Wayne Watson pushed her to accuse Phillip Beverly of sexual harassment, though Peebles said she was never harassed.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. FIRE’s Worst for Free Speech Spotlight: Brandeis University

 

And now for the final installment of my Ricochet-exclusive spotlight on FIRE’s “worst” list for campus free speech in 2014. For my third and final spotlight, I want to introduce readers to the single college that has made the worst list more than any other college (finally edging out Syracuse University, which is a twotime recipient of this dubious honor). Here’s the entry for Brandeis:

Brandeis University

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. FIRE’s Worst for Free Speech Spotlight: Modesto Junior College

 

As I announced in my last post, FIRE has revealed its “10 Worst for Free Speech” list. Yesterday, I brought your attention to a worrisome ongoing case at Marquette University. Today, I want to bring your attention to another case that won’t seem to end: Modesto Junior College.

Modesto Junior College (Modesto, Calif.)

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. FIRE’s Worst for Free Speech Spotlight: Marquette University

 

And now for the list you’ve all been waiting for: FIRE’s “10 Worst for Free Speech on Campus” list for 2014. While the phrasing of that title may seem a little odd, we changed it from “Worst Colleges for Free Speech” this year because sometimes outside institutions are major threats to collegiate free speech. For the second year in a row, the Department of Education is likely the biggest threat to free speech on campus. You can brush up on the details in my December 2014 Ricochet post entitled Campus Speech Codes Decline, But Federal Government Threatens to Impose Censorship Codes at 100% of Colleges.

But I wanted to bring Ricochet readers’ attention to a handful of “winners” in particular. One of the most urgent cases here is the one still going on at Marquette University:

Member Post

 

This morning, following on from my post yesterday about speech, social media, and college campuses, I came across this gem. A professor at Berkley – in the social work school, no less – recently told his students that [T]he Black Lives Matter movement “needed to stop scapegoating the cops” and shared statistics to argue black-on-black crime is the real […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, But Hate Speech Is Constitutional

 

Yik Yak, a controversial social media app, has colleges embroiled in debate as to the proper extents of speech on campuses. Yik Yak is a program that gives the user a “a live feed of what everyone’s saying around you.” On campuses around the country this can lead to predictable results when you combine adolescents, newly freed from the control of their parents, with the ability to spontaneously broadcast whatever they happen to be feeling in that moment within a 10-mile radius.

As noted by one writer at LSU, the results can often be what is popularly considered “hate speech.” Noting some of the truly terrible things that her fellow students feel free to share through the app, she writes:

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. A Meditation on Politics and Speech

 

Jonathan Chait just published a lengthy think-piece in the New York magazine about political correctness, identity politics, and the left’s newfound skepticism about free speech. I won’t bother to reproduce it here, because a) it’s mostly a series of interconnected anecdotes that don’t lend themselves to fisking, and b) there’s not really anything in it conservatives haven’t been grumping about for the past few years. Still, it’s nice to see that even flaks who make their living calling Republicans murderers for not being fond of Obamacare can have a sensible thought once in a while.

Chait is correct — though it galls me to admit it — in saying, along with fellow-travelers Frederik DeBoer (who wrote a similar essay last year) and Andrew Sullivan, that the modern social-justice left has in large part devolved into a whinging comparative-oppression Olympics where the laurels go not to the strong or swift but to those who reach for the smelling salts quickest, and whose swoons onto the nearest fainting couch are most theatrical and filled with au courant buzzwords. He is also correct in recognizing that there is a powerful trend in modern progressivism turning away from small-l “liberal” abstract values like free speech and towards a hard-nosed consequentialism where the ends truly do justify the means. On this point Chait actually gets off something resembling a zinger:

Member Post

 

Thank God–hater of gays, or not–we have thousands of bureaucrats in Washington standing ready to adjudicate this latest discriminatory-cake-decoration case. Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. I Am Not Charlie and Neither Are You

 

I am not Charlie.

If I was, I would be dead by now.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. ‘God Cannot Be Mocked’

 

As a teenager, I was easily offended. Any perceived slight would earn an immediate “That’s not fair!” to which adults within earshot would either roll their eyes or ignore. (I didn’t think that was fair either, nor do my tween daughters today.) At 15, I became an evangelical Christian and appended this teenage whininess to my faith. When evil sinners denigrated my God or my inchoate beliefs, I would angrily condemn their blasphemies. After all the Good Book states, “God cannot be mocked.” The Big Guy upstairs needs an uptight high schooler to defend His honor!

Wednesday we had a vastly more violent reaction to religious offense. As is all too common, Islamist radicals murdered individuals who mocked not their God, but a flawed human whom they claim as a prophet. Jihadists never seem as defensive about Islam’s other prophets, be they Jesus, Moses or Jonah. No, only the scimitar-swinging Mohammed is so fragile that he cannot even be illustrated without a bloodbath of vengeance.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Bask in the Crazy: Hate Speech

 

Though the bulk of a conservative’s time engaging liberal arguments is best spent addressing their most pointed and nuanced positions, I believe we should occasionally indulge ourselves by reveling in their worst arguments and fringe elements. Arguments such as this piece by Tanya Cohen which flips George Orwell the proverbial bird.

Published on the site Thought Catalogue — a name is straight out of an Orwell novel — Cohen makes the case that the United States trails far behind such paragons of virtue as Turkey, Jordan, Russia and India when it comes to basic human rights.