Tag: Barack Obama

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Ways to Give Aid and Comfort to the Enemy

 

Tinker-Tailor-BOOKAt the conclusion of John le Carré’s famous spy novel, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, British intelligence officer George Smiley recounts his questioning of Bill Haydon, an agent whose character in the book is loosely based on the exploits of one of Britain’s most notorious traitors during the early days of the Cold War, Kim Philby. Smiley managed to pry several nuggets of information from Haydon’s confession, including his contempt for Britain and rejecting his country for “aesthetic” reasons, only partly informed by morality.

In the annals of the world’s second oldest profession, why should Bill Haydon’s motives matter to the rest of us? After all, the Cold War has long been over, and one supposes that the huge corpus of espionage literature has moved on to juicier, more current topics. Still, this character’s reasons for switching sides retain their grip on our judgments, because Western educational systems have created breeding grounds for reaching similar kinds of conclusions. In fact, the contemporary relevance of Haydon’s thoughts is frightening.

However, it certainly is not necessary to throw oneself into a full-blown, Ann Coulter-like (Treason!), “loose lips sink ships” mode, and I am far from having any expertise in the sordid and convoluted realm of spying and national betrayal. Still, some back-of-the-envelope musing about this complex subject may generate some useful hypotheses about different ways of giving aid and comfort to the enemy, a phrase found in the Constitution. Here are a few to consider.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Unintended Consequences: Docs & Glocks Edition

 

shutterstock_151057025Several years ago, the American Medical Association instituted a new policy of recommending that doctors enquire about their patients’ firearms. This was pitched as a matter of household and child safety and — while the policy stressed “education” — its language makes it pretty clear that this is not something Eddie Eagle would endorse. Despite not having kids, I’ve been asked about my guns at least twice at the doctor’s. The first time, I wasn’t expecting it and simply answered the nice nurse’s question. The second time, I said something to the effect of, “Thank you, but I don’t think that’s a medical question.” The nurse shrugged and the appointment proceeded as before.

Unsurprisingly, stories soon emerged about doctors dropping patients who refused to answer the question, as well as others who (chillingly) tried to talk to children about it behind their parents’ backs. In response, several states, including Florida, passed legislation that forbade doctors and other medical professionals to bring up the subject of guns under most circumstances.

Much has been written about this: I came across a discussion of it on Science-Based Medicine earlier this week, which made reference to a recent post on the Volokh Conspiracy that I’d missed. We’ve also talked about it on Ricochet. The most recent news is that the Florida law has again been found constitutional, this time on First Amendment grounds subject to strict scrutiny. That seems like a bad decision to me, but I’ll recommend you read others’ takes to form a legal opinion.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Breaking: SCOTUS to Hear Immigration Case

 

shutterstock_216196921From the NYT:

Fourteen months ago, Mr. Obama ordered the creation of a program intended to allow as many as five million illegal immigrants who are the parents of citizens or of lawful permanent residents to apply for a program sparing them from deportation and providing them work permits. The program was called Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, or DAPA. The president has said the program was the result of years of frustration with Republicans in Congress who had repeatedly refused to support bipartisan Senate legislation to update immigration laws. In an Oval Office address just before Thanksgiving in 2014, Mr. Obama excoriated Republicans for refusing to cooperate and told millions of illegal immigrants, “You can come out of the shadows.”

But the president’s promise has gone unfulfilled. A coalition of 26 states, led by the attorney general in Texas, a Republican, quickly filed a lawsuit accusing the president of ignoring federal procedures for changing rules and of abusing the power of his office by sidestepping Congress. In February, Judge Andrew S. Hanen of Federal District Court in Brownsville, Tex., entered a preliminary injunction shutting down the program while the legal case proceeded. The government appealed, and on Nov. 9 a divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, affirmed the injunction.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. “13 Hours” – The Film. The Honor. The Disgrace.

 

I have just seen the film 13 Hours, directed by Michael Bay. I’m still reading the book and I’m about halfway through it. The film in a word is outstanding and should be seen by everyone. Watching Americans being attacked at our consulate and CIA outpost in Benghazi and killed while jets sat idle in Italy and Croatia while repeated calls for help were ignored at the highest levels is of course an indictment of our gutless wonder of a president.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Obama’s Misuse of Presidential Power Will Render His Gains Hollow

 

Obama-Umpquah-ShootingConservative presidential candidates are struggling with executive power. Last night, some candidates like Donald Trump promised to expand presidential power to pursue conservative priorities. But does this make him as unprincipled as Barack Obama, who has stretched the President’s domestic powers beyond the constitutional breaking point?

In the Washington Post today, I try to explain where the Framers intended the President to exercise initiative — in foreign affairs — and where it is to pay deference to Congress — domestic affairs. President Obama, I argue, has pursued a reverse mirror image of the Framers’ Presidency. But that only will give the tool to the next President to more powerfully restore the original constitutional structure.

President Obama has all but declared that he will spend his last year in office acting unilaterally to advance his agenda. But his basic misunderstanding of presidential power will render his gains hollow, and his excesses will create the very tools to undo his legacy.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Classicist Podcast with Victor Davis Hanson: “Deterrence and International Affairs”

 

Victor Davis Hanson explains the fundamentals of deterrence, looks at historical examples of its failures and successes, and examines how the Obama Administration has failed to use the strategy.

Listen in above or subscribe to The Classicist podcast through iTunes.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Obama Is Right. America Remains Pretty Awesome. But We Can Be Even More Awesome.

 

In his State of the Union speech last night, President Obama declared, “Anyone claiming that America’s economy is in decline is peddling fiction.”

He has a point. In fact, it’s not a particularly difficult argument to make. Despite a historically slow recovery, America continues to grow much faster than its advanced economy competitors. (Great Stagnation? Are you talking about China?) No large economy generates as many high-impact new companies as America, and no large economy is as competitive. The US remains the top destination for the world’s job seekers. Among most advanced economies, the working-age population will shrink over the coming decades. But America’s will grow. And given the difficulty of measuring the new digital economy with old wheat-and-steel economy metrics, Goldman Sachs warns that Americans should “be skeptical of confident pronouncements that the standard of living is growing much more slowly than in the past.”

Not that Team America doesn’t face challenges. Of course it does. It always does. Demographics will make fast growth harder than it has been in the past. Technology may be advancing faster and transforming labor markets more quickly than our education system is able to equip most children to fully exploit it. Our government doesn’t do particularly well in providing the key services we currently demand from it. It’s also made financial promises it’s unlikely to keep. Too many people still aren’t working or working for decent pay. Upward mobility may not be getting worse but it doesn’t seem to be getting better. Americans are worried, with two-thirds thinking the country is headed in the wrong direction.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The State of Obama Address

 

president-obama-sotuPresidential State of the Union addresses have something of a checkered past.

What started as an “annual message” in 1790—all the US Constitution dictates is the President “shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the State of the Union”—nominally changed in 1946, then crept into television’s prime time beginning in 1965.

In 1981, Ronald Reagan took the big speech in yet another direction, not for the better: “heroes” in the House gallery. Reagan did it to salute an average Joe named Lenny who jumped into an icy river to save a plane-crash survivor. Since then, it’s been a seemingly inexhaustible supply of human props meant to back a presidential agenda. A pathway to America’s future, it would seem, must include a little pathos.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Who Would You Invite to the State of the Union?

 

clint-eastwood-chair-rnc-2012We did it, America! The nation has survived to witness Obama’s last State of the Union address. Granted, he still has 12 more months to let us get taken over by Uruguay or sign an executive order ceding all 50 states to Belgium, but we can finally see the light at the end of the tunnel.

As usual, the First Lady invited a slew of special guests to join her in the gallery, a convention first popularized when Nancy Reagan invited Lenny Skutnik, a federal worker who had rescued a plane crash victim from the Potomac.

According to the White House, tonight’s guests “tell the story of the progress we have made since the president delivered his first address seven years ago.” They include Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft; Maj. Lisa Jaster, one of the first female Army Reserve officers to graduate from Ranger School; Refaai Hamo, a Syrian refugee who lives in Troy, Mich.; and Cedric Rowland, a Chicago Obamacare “navigator.”

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Essential Paradox of Gun Control

 

On Tuesday, President Obama gave a speech outlining his new gun control program. As is typical for him, the speech was fatuous, disingenuous, and replete with factual errors. It was also warmly received by three group: Democrats, the media, and the shareholders of gun manufacturers.

Shares of Sturm, Ruger & Co. and Smith & Wesson jumped by double digits earlier in the week (though they’ve since retreated) in anticipation of a spike in sales. Since Obama assumed office and the end of last year, their stock has yielded compounded annualized total returns of 43 and 38 percent, respectively, compared to 16 percent for the S&P 500 Index. Every time the president tries to advance his gun control agenda, gun manufacturers reap a windfall.Source: http://nyti.ms/1lRcsRC

Member Post

 

It’s just possibly an H-bomb test. Nowhere near as threatening as Climate Change which could really be devastating… uh… someday…some decade … some century …some millennium. It’s not like North Korea is ruled by a madman or has ever threatened South Korea, Japan, America… or… uh… anything. No one has anything to worry about. Our […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

The president’s targeting (and that of the left in general) of people with “mental health” issues on gun control puts our veterans squarely in the crosshairs, if you’ll pardon the pun. What is the fate of a vet who saw a mental health provider for a few months after coming home, in order to square […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

To Whom It May Concern: Although it seems like Mr. Barack Obama has worked as my president for much longer than seven years, I am thrilled to hear that he is pursuing a new position. You will be very lucky if you can get him to work for you. As a voter, citizen and taxpayer, […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Is Barack Obama a Grand Strategist of the Very First Rank?

 

Barack_Obama_takes_one_last_look_in_the_mirror_before_going_out_to_take_oath_Jan._20_2009-960x686In The American Conservative, Alfred W. McCoy — Harrington Professor of History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, author of Torture and Impunity: The U.S. Doctrine of Coercive Interrogation, and co-editor of Endless Empire: Europe’s Eclipse, Spain’s Retreat, America’s Declineargues that this is so, and this is how he begins:

In ways that have eluded Washington pundits and policymakers, President Barack Obama is deploying a subtle geopolitical strategy that, if successful, might give Washington a fighting chance to extend its global hegemony deep into the 21st century. After six years of silent, sometimes secret preparations, the Obama White House has recently unveiled some bold diplomatic initiatives whose sum is nothing less than a tri-continental strategy to check Beijing’s rise. As these moves unfold, Obama is revealing himself as one of those rare grandmasters who appear every generation or two with an ability to go beyond mere foreign policy and play that ruthless global game called geopolitics.

Since he took office in 2009, Obama has faced an unremitting chorus of criticism, left and right, domestic and foreign, dismissing him as hapless, even hopeless. “He’s a poor ignoramus; he should read and study a little to understand reality,” said Venezuela’s leftist president Hugo Chavez, just months after Obama’s inauguration. “I think he has projected a position of weakness and… a lack of leadership,” claimed Republican Sen. John McCain in 2012. “After six years,” opined a commentator from the conservative Heritage Foundation last April, “he still displays a troubling misunderstanding of power and the leadership role the United States plays in the international system.” Even former Democratic President Jimmy Carter recently dismissed Obama’s foreign policy achievements as “minimal.” Voicing the views of many Americans, Donald Trump derided his global vision this way: “We have a president who doesn’t have a clue.”

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Is America an Indispensable Nation?

 

In 1998, Madeleine Albright described the United States as “the indispensable nation.” In 2014, Micah Zenko denounced this claim as a myth. A year later, Xenia Wickett argued that Albright was right. “The fact remains,” she writes,

that, today, the US is indispensable – a necessary, if not sufficient actor in addressing the world’s biggest challenges.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Democrats’ Best Weapon: Trump

 

TrumpThe dictionary defines “bogeyman” as “an imaginary evil spirit, referred to typically to frighten children.” Hello Donald Trump. It’s not clear whether he set out intentionally to elect Hillary Clinton, but there is little question that he could not be fulfilling the role of Republican bogeyman to greater effect.

As Commentary’s Jonathan Tobin noted, during a week in which the disastrous fecklessness of this President and his party in the face of terrorism ought to have been Topic A, we are all talking about Trump instead. Brilliant. Tobin’s point actually applies to the entire presidential contest. By rights, it should be about the Democrats’ unraveling. From Obamacare to terrorism, from the economy to climate change, and from guns to free speech, progressive policies have proven deeply disappointing when not downright obtuse and dangerous. Mrs. Clinton promises more of the same while trailing an oil slick of corruption in her wake. And yet swinging into the frame week-in and week-out, the orange-maned billionaire bogeyman dominates the discussion.

Hell yes, Republicans are anti-Hispanic bigots, Trump (a lifelong Democrat) is supposed to confirm. Just look at the way he talked about Mexican “rapists” and vowed to build a wall that Mexico will fund.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. A Presidency That Shall Live in Infamy

 

President Barack Obama is photographed during a presidential portrait sitting for an official photo in the Oval Office, Dec. 6, 2012. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)Over three-and-a half centuries ago, exhausted from decades-long religious warfare, treaties brought peace to Europe while establishing an international system of sovereign nation states. Those documents signed at Westphalia started to develop rules of war between nations, which were later refined by conventions established in the Swiss city of Geneva.

Almost three quarters of a century ago (seventy-four years yesterday), on a quiet Sunday morning, the nation woke up to the news that a bit of American soil of which most had never heard — Pearl Harbor in Hawaii — had been attacked by the Imperial Navy of Japan, killing thousands of American sailors and others, and severely disabling our Pacific fleet. Had our aircraft carriers been additional targets at harbor rather than out at sea, the situation would have been far more dire.

As Don Surber notes, the FBI did not get involved, and no one asked what “their motive” was. Instead, before the week was out, we had declared war on Japan and, after their totalitarian ally declared war on us, on Nazi Germany as well. Along with allies, we went on to win it decisively, establishing modern peaceful democracies in the defeated lands. It was the last time to date that we have done so. Our nation has been involved in armed combat in the defense of freedom against totalitarianism many times over the decades since, and lost tens of thousands of American lives in the process, but we have never formally declared war and, more importantly, never been allowed to actually win one. From Korea, to Vietnam, the superpower that emerged from that global conflict was constrained by threats of nuclear annihilation or the dictates of the dictators’ club that we established at Turtle Bay seven decades ago.

Member Post

 

In the Bizarro world of “htraE” (“Earth” spelled backwards), society is ruled by the Bizarro Code which states “Us do opposite of all Earthly things! Us hate beauty! Us love ugliness! Is big crime to make anything perfect on Bizarro World!” In one episode, for example, a salesman is doing a brisk trade selling Bizarro […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.