Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. The Death of a Mouse in Five Acts

 

Act 1: In Which Our Hero Makes His Appearance. A few days ago, Marie and I were grocery shopping in Safeway when we saw a stuffed mouse, all dressed up for Christmas, incongruously standing behind the bananas in the produce department. The thing was tall (standing on the floor, it came up to my kneecap) and it was a steal for $9.74.

As you see in the photo, this was a fine, jaunty mouse, looking more like Topo Gigio than Mickey the Mouse. He had little reindeer woven into its winter coat, which was trimmed in fur. A pair of gloves, a scarf, and a perky Santa hat completed his ensemble. Though the mouse probably originated in the mind of a Chinese entrepreneur and then sewn together by the dexterous hands of Chinese maidens, the little rodent looked like something that might have come straight out of a quaint little shop in Santa Claus, Indiana. Those Chinese know us.

Act II: In Which the Villain Arrives on the Scene. Bob the dog thinks that anything that comes into the house that looks like a dog toy is his. So he sat under it for hours, looking up and whimpering for us to take it down and give it to him.

We knew that if we let him have the mouse, Bob would destroy it within minutes. This was our Christmas decoration. So we resisted. But after hours of listening to Bob’s pathetic moaning, we couldn’t take it any longer, so we drove back to Safeway and bought another mouse, this one just for Bob.

(You probably also think we’re pampering our dog, that we’re canine enablers! But that couldn’t possibly be true. You see, there is a precise correlation between owners who spoil their dogs and owners who give their dogs cutesy nicknames. We would never do that. We don’t even call Bob our fur baby — though we’re sorely tempted.)

Act III: In Which Bob’s Normally Suppressed Canine Instincts Come Alive. When we got home with the mouse, Bob jumped up and down, pawed the rug, and circled three times in a frenzy. We asked forgiveness of the mouse and then threw him into the den with the Bobster.

Bob pounced on that mouse like a lion on a gazelle. Within minutes, the mouse was on his back being eviscerated. The poor thing still has a smile on his face. Those Chinese seamstresses would have cried if they could see what you see below.

After an hour or so, here’s Mr. Bob with the scattered remains of the mouse’s cotton entrails. Bob seems to have a “Did I do OK?” look on his face.

Act IV: Mouse Resurrection. To the righthere’s what the poor mouse looked like after we had stuffed most of his innards back in. Parts of him have gone missing. He is now sans eyes, sans ears, and sans arms. His tail has been dismembered.

Marie will gather up the parts and resurrect the mouse by sewing the poor thing together. His resurrected form, seen to the left, however, is missing his eyes, one arm, one leg, one ear, half his suit, and a tail. We don’t know where those parts went to. Marie probably thought it futile to sew the tail back on.

Mr. Bob will play with the mouse for a while, listlessly tearing off an appendage every now and then (which Marie dutifully sews back on), but the thrill is largely gone. The mouse will slowly sink down to the bottom of the toy box and spend his remaining days a pathetic and forgotten thing.

Act V: Denouement. Before the mouse came into the house, Bob had destroyed toys galore. We thought we had learned our lesson — no more dog toys unless they’re made of indestructible rubber. But the Bobber made such a pathetic picture as he sat there longing for the mouse that we folded like a cheap lawn chair. We’ll probably fold again in the future. We’re eminently foldable when it comes to the Bobster.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. An Honest Question About Flu Numbers

 

One of the few pieces of good news this year is that the flu season has been exceptionally mild so far. While it’s great that we don’t have to face two deadly epidemics simultaneously, I have a question:

Why is there less flu in 2020 than other years?

Here are the possibilities that I have come up with:

  1. Everyone who was going to get the flu has already succumbed to the Wuhan virus.
  2. The preventative measures being used to fight the Wuhan virus protect against the flu.
  3. More people are getting flu vaccinations and/or the vaccines are more effective than other years.
  4. Flu cases are being undercounted.
  5. Exposure to the Wuhan virus in some way provides protection from the flu.
  6. The flu strain is extraordinarily mild this year,

The impetus for this post was a discussion I had with @kozak in the comments of @arizonapatriot‘s excellent post, Covid Deaths Are Real: Rebutting Dr. Briand. I stated that I thought that the reason that there are fewer flu deaths was because most of the people who were going to die of flu were already dead from the Wuhan virus. Kozak replied:

We have tens of millions of elderly and people with multiple risk factors for covid death who are 50+ years old. Plenty of people left to potentially get infected and die either of Covid or the flu. . .

Only a tiny fraction of those susceptible have died. Again. tens of millions of elderly, hypertensive, diabetic, cardiac, immunocompromised, fat, etc etc etc people in the US.

It is true that only a tiny fraction of those susceptible die of the Wuhan virus, but the same can be said for people who die of flu. While there are millions at risk, only the most susceptible die of either disease. I would bet the Venn diagrams of both populations are pretty congruent.

Still, while that may be a partial answer to why fewer people are dying, it doesn’t answer why fewer people are contracting the flu.

Kozak and others have posited that people are not getting the flu because of the protective measures: hand-washing, masks, distancing, lockdowns, etc-being used to stop the spread of the Wuhan virus. That begs the question: If these measures are stopping the spread of the flu, why aren’t they working to stop the spread of the Wuhan Virus? Right now, cases of the Wuhan virus are supposedly “surging” throughout the country, despite the fact that the protective measures have been in place for months. Why isn’t flu surging as well? Stating that the Wuhan virus spread is from people being careless about wearing masks is not an answer, because the flu should also be affected by how well the rules are being followed.

I’m posting this because I’m honestly puzzled about it. It could be the possibilities listed above are all, to one degree or another, reasons we are seeing less flu. What do you think?

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

We have seen countless numeric experts point to the extreme statistical unlikelihood of huge votes for Biden – like 130% for Biden, ad -30% for Trump. Other experts show the ballots cast from other counties and other states. One example: 17,514 of these voters asked the USPS to forward their mail OUT OF STATE to non-APO/DPO/FPO […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Why isnt this on the main feed and watched by everyone? Why isnt this on NRO? Who knows. But here it is. So far I have heard testimony that only belongs in the third world. Ballot stuffing, intimidation, hundreds of dead voters, thousands from addresses that were empty lots, ballots that have nothing but Joe […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. United States v. “The Spirit of ’76”

 

The fighting retreat to preserve the First Amendment seems hopeless at times, but things have actually been much worse in America in the past. Under the dark days of the presidency of Woodrow Mussolini Wilson, Congress passed the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, under which any criticism of any government figure or policy became a felony. Fortunately, Woodrow Wilson was an overt racist so it did not occur to him to also invent a pretext to prosecute “hate crimes” on top of the other legal atrocities he perpetrated.

Among the most noteworthy abuses of that period was the ironically named case United States v. Spirit of ’76 in which a silent film about the American Revolution was seized by authorities and its producer/director Robert Goldstein sentenced to a prison term of ten years. The film was overly pro-American (the good guys won the Revolutionary War in the movie) but the federal crime was to depict British troops committing atrocities in the 1778 Wyoming Valley Massacre thus potentially undermining the audience’s commitment to our alliance with the British in WWI. (Historical note: The British usually delegated atrocities to Iroquois allies and/or loyalist colonial militia (the name Banastre Tarleton comes to mind) while looking the other way and being duly appalled afterward. So the one scene of a redcoat bayonetting a baby was unquestionably inaccurate and over the top–but ten years in the slammer for that?)

Trial judge Benjamin Franklin Bledsoe (a Wilson appointee and a proud descendant of a Revolutionary War veteran) offered a number of chillingly modern perspectives on the First Amendment in his opinion in this case (see, 252 F. 946 (1917) S.D. Calif.).

History is history, and fact is fact. There is no doubt about that. At the present time, however, the United States is confronted with what I conceive to be the greatest emergency we have ever been confronted with at any time in our history.

Facts shmacts. There is an emergency underway, people. This was 20 years before Hitler, 90 before 9/11 and 100 years before the worst emergency of all – COVID 19. Or is it Trump or climate change? I forget. Anyway, think of what Judge Bledsoe could do with climate change denialism or systemic racism under these statutes.

And it is not at all necessary that it should be shown to have such effect; it is enough if it is calculated reasonably so to excite or inflame the passions of our people, or some of them, as that they will be deterred from giving that full measure of co-operation, sympathy, assistance, and sacrifice which is due to Great Britain, simply because of the fact that Great Britain, as an ally of ours, is working with us to fight the battle which we think strikes at our very existence as a nation.

I am reminded of that pathetic fellow Nakoula Basseley Nakoula whose silly video The Innocence of Muslims was said to inflame people who already hated us and thus cause an attack on our ambassador. Judge Bledsoe would certainly have fried him.

… a sedulous effort was indulged in by [Goldstein] to insert those things which would tend to “excite” and to create a prejudice against Great Britain. This demands an inquiry into the ultimate motives and purposes of this man, and no doubt justifies other and different action against him.

Keep in mind this opinion was only about the part of the case in which the judge had to rule on a motion to return the film to its investors. So, Goldstein must have already known he would be toast in his criminal trial. German, Jewish, movie maker…and toast.

Therefore, as I say, this is no time or place for the exploitation of that which, at another time or place, or under different circumstances, might be harmless and innocuous in its every aspect. It is like the “right of free speech,” upon which such great stress is now being laid. That which in ordinary times might be clearly permissible, or even commendable, in this hour of national emergency, effort, and peril, may be as clearly treasonable, and therefore properly subject to review and repression. The constitutional guaranty of “free speech” carries with it no right to subvert the purposes and destiny of the nation.

This is the scariest part of the opinion. Note the quotation marks around the words “free speech” and “right of free speech” as if these were just silly slogans with no particular legal import. Looks kind of modern doesn’t it? It’s like something a tenured lefty college professor would write.

In the new emerging order of things, are we headed back under Wilsonian rule? Just declare an emergency, put forth a government program of action to address the emergency then punish anybody who interferes (even unintentionally) or expresses any disagreement with the program or criticism of the officials who execute it. I can think of a few governors and social media moguls who are channeling Wilson and old Judge Bledsoe even as I type these words.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

and blows: BREAKING: @Project_Veritas’ @JamesOKeefeIII just recorded and Livestreamed President Jeff Zucker’s 9am Editorial Phone Call With @CNN Senior Leadershiphttps://t.co/dI8NU9PPgY — Benny (@bennyjohnson) December 1, 2020

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Convincing People That They Are Helpless Is Dangerous, to All of Us.

 

The NFL ran a “We may be filthy rich but we’re nice Democrats, not evil Republicans!” ad during one of their Thanksgiving day games. It featured Michael Thomas, an NFL player who is qualified to speak on the complex social problems which face our nation because he is black, an exceptional athlete, and with a prominent beard. In the ad, Mr. Thomas was touring police stations, jails, and other law enforcement facilities while appearing to be nice to white police officers. Even though black police officers are ubiquitous in America, they were conspicuously absent in this commercial, for some reason. Mr. Thomas made the following statement in the ad, which I found fascinating:

“We talked to judges, and community leaders, to offer solutions, to make our system more just, which included advocating for reduced arrests, and policies, that reflected where we are as a society today.”

There’s just so much here. But what really struck me was that he wanted to reduce arrests, so he went to the police department. That would be like trying to reduce car crashes by going to the auto body shop.

Shouldn’t he have addressed such problems a bit further upstream? Shouldn’t he have been talking to families, single mothers, deadbeat dads, churches, and so on? I mean, by the time the police are booking a young man for a crime, isn’t it a little late to say “we need fewer arrests”?

So why did he go to the police department?

Partially because it’s easy, I suppose. What are the police going to say to a filthy rich young black man with a camera crew? “Scram. We’ve got work to do.” No, they’ll act interested and nice, and get back to protecting American citizens as soon as he leaves. Why not? He wants a photo op, so they give him a photo op. No big deal.

But the other problem would be that if Mr. Thomas were to acknowledge that the police department is better suited to prosecuting crime rather than preventing it, he would be forced to acknowledge the unspeakable truth: That the only people who can reduce crime, and thereby reduce arrests, are criminals. If they stop committing crimes, they will stop getting arrested.

But that would suggest that young black men are capable of making decisions on their own. And that those decisions play a role in how their life turns out. That would suggest that young black men are not helpless victims, and that they have some control over their own lives.

Democrats believe that that Inconvenient Truth must remain concealed. For a lot of reasons.

When Joe Biden said, “If you don’t vote for me, you ain’t black” he was being honest. The idea that a black person could engage in independent thought is blasphemy to a Democrat.

And Democrats say that Republicans are racist!

Blacks should vote 99% for Democrats. If they want to go to college, they should hope that an affirmative action program lets them in. Getting into college through hard work and delayed gratification are microaggressions of the white patriarchy. Blacks get arrested not because they commit crimes, but because they are black. Their behavior, and their choices, are irrelevant.

If you wanted someone to become responsible for themselves, you would not tell them that their behavior and their choices are irrelevant. But this is not what Democrats want.

Democrats aggressively promote the idea that black people don’t have a say in how their lives turn out. And they can’t possibly be expected to make good decisions on their own. So then, obviously, blacks are completely dependent on benevolent white people, because blacks are incapable of independent thought. Blacks must be protected because they obviously can’t be expected to take care of themselves.

Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, nearly every Republican in the country, millions of middle and upper-class Blacks, and many others might take a different view. But never mind them.

And Democrats say that Republicans are racist.

One of the many reasons that all big governments fail is that the high taxes, dominant government, and overwhelming regulatory environment convince the citizens that their success in life is determined not by their own behavior and choices, but by government fiat. Such a society can’t last long. When people stop working to improve themselves, that society can only go one direction.

Want another example of that?

The Democrat party started trying to convince black people that they couldn’t succeed without Democrats. That their own behavior was less important than how they voted. They started that in the 1960s or so. And what do we have now? Blacks who vote reliably Democrat. And a black culture that has been nearly utterly destroyed. Prisons full of young, black men. Who were full of promise and potential. Until the Democrat party got a hold of them.

And Democrats say that Republicans are racist.

The Democrat Party should be ashamed of themselves. So should the NFL. So should Michael Thomas.

This is sick.

And now our schools are producing millions of new Democrat voters by convincing them that our society is unjust and that they need the Democrat party to survive. How they vote is more important than hard work, delayed gratification, and improving themselves. Independent thought is discouraged, and they can’t be expected to make sound choices and take responsibility for themselves.

This is what our schools are doing to our youth, across the country.

Golly, I wonder how that will turn out?

Perhaps Michael Thomas could help me answer that question.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

“I’ve found that if you put quote marks around it, people will find it credible.”—Sir Daniel Brunton, OEP What do you think, Ricochet? Is this credible?

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Wisconsin has 8 House districts.   DEM GOP 1 163,170 238,271 2 318,523 138,306 3 199,870 189,524 4 232,668 70,769 5 175,902 265,434 6 164,239 238,874 7 162,741 252,048 8 149,558 268,173         1,566,671 1,661,399 GOP got more House votes by 94,728 votes District 4 looks shady.     DEM GOP diff […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. The Talk

 

Many television shows have recently portrayed versions of “The Talk,” This Is Us being the most recent of which I am aware. I gather The Talk is a coming of age moment in the life of every Black child where there is communicated the manner in which one is to acquit oneself when pulled over by a police officer. I have some sincere questions about this practice.

Question 1:

Portrayals on TV are always presented in the context of Ferguson, Rayshard Brooks, George Floyd, etc. Just off the top of my head: Ferguson (amped up criminal thug fresh from committing assault, battery and robbery attacked a police officer and endeavored to take the officer’s gun and use it to murder the officer), Rayshard Brooks (approached for operating a vehicle under the influence, attacked two police officers while resisting arrest, stole a Taser from one of the officers and fired it as the officer while fleeing), and Mr. Floyd (approached by officers after “balling” – injecting a mixture of cocaine and fentanyl anally – and passing counterfeit bills, resisting arrest and dying from the effects of the fentanyl as his lungs were filled with liquid. It must be noted that the officers twice requested an ambulance to tend to Mr. Floyd’s condition).

So how does The Talk approach this? Maybe an admonition to not disarm police officers or attempt to take their weapons from them? Followed by the common-sense observation that, if you should ever successfully acquire an officer’s weapon, don’t attempt to murder the officer? Concluding with, and don’t inject cocaine and fentanyl up your derriere – or anywhere else for that matter? Seriously? There is a need for such a talk?

Question 2:

What is it about Black culture that we are to believe necessitates such warnings? I admittedly come from a predominantly White background. No member of my family ever felt the need to explain the advantages, indeed the necessity, of not attempting to disarm and murder police officers. For that matter, I was never specifically told to avoid robbing stores and driving drunk. I feel that was rather understood. As for the anal injection of fentanyl, again, never really came up.

What am I to make of these more in sorrow than in anger – though there are copious amounts of anger – depictions of this ritual? They seem to say very little about law enforcement and quite a bit about Black culture — none of it good. In what universe are we to believe that an entire race of children needs to be made specifically aware of the seemingly immutable law of the jungle out there that precludes attacking police officers who are simply doing their jobs – to say nothing of balling?

In all seriousness, how is it allowable to portray Black children as lacking in remedial common sense?

I am particularly interested in hearing from anyone who identifies as Black if “The Talk” is a real thing or a media invention. And if it is real, is it the case that Black children really are uniquely unaware of the necessity to not attempt to kill police officers? Or to not engage in the predicate criminality that puts one in contact with police officers?

Do such talks ever point out the consistently professional and compassionate actions of all officers involved in all of these instances? It might be nice to leave our children with a healthy appreciation of law enforcement.

Lastly, I have noted that reference to The Talk is almost always in the context of an understanding that White Americans should feel guilty that such a talk is necessary. If I ever actually felt the need to have such a talk with either of my boys, both of whom I have raised, I would expect no one to feel guilty. But someone would feel greatly embarrassed: me.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

When will there be enough evidence to stop this election farce? As I understand it, President Trump and all the people supporting him have gathered enough videos, affidavits, expert witnesses, math geniuses (spelling?),”the smartest man in the room”, etc., to more than meet the lowest bar of the three levels of evidence in legal terms. […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Being Vulnerable: Gratitude

 

The word “Jew” comes from the name given to the patriarch Judah: “[Leah] conceived again and bore a son, and declared, ‘This time I will thank the LORD.’ Therefore, she named him Judah.” (Gen. 29:35)

So an entire people is named after this one verb: to thank. Saying “thank you” is a definitional part of Judaism. Indeed, we understand that while we can delegate just about any job or task to someone else, “thank you” always has to be done in person, not through an intermediary.

But why does “thank you” really matter?

“Why do you hate me? I have not done anything nice for you!” I heard this as a Chinese expression, but like so many great aphorisms, it clearly translates between cultures. There is something that happens when we feel like we owe someone else. It festers inside us, becoming a barrier to relationships.

That is because saying “thank you” does not come easy. We have to teach our children to do it, and they instinctively resist the urge. “Please,” “Thank you,” and “You are welcome,” form the tripod of a loving relationship, family, or society. Each of these phrases is a step forward.

“Please” is a way of revealing our own needs, exposing our limitations, our reliance on other people. It is an admission that we cannot do things ourselves, that we are asking for something that could be refused. Kids really push back from this one. You can always tell a poorly-raised kid by their manners.

The next step is often even harder. Years ago, when I was a young choral singer, I was taught by the choirmaster how to receive a compliment, even (or especially) if you felt it was not deserved. You do not say, “I wish I had done better,” or “It was nothing [not worthy of thanks].” These are answers that throw the “thank you” back in someone’s face, rejecting them and their overture. Instead, we were taught to simply say, “Thank you.” If we thank someone, we are making them important to us, and doing it in an open and loving way. It makes all the difference.

“You are welcome” seals the deal, acknowledging mutual need and appreciation. It is far better than “no problem,” for example, since “no problem” belittles the initial gratitude and appreciation, saying that whatever was done is really beneath our attention or concern. The most insecure people are those that have the hardest time learning how to receive the thanks of others.

The challenge is that none of these things come naturally, as we can see from the fact that children (and adults) need to be taught to say them. And if we fail to do them, then we live out that Chinese aphorism: nice acts that are not appreciated become the source of awkwardness or hatred. “No good deed goes unpunished,” is what happens when good deeds are not appreciated and acknowledged by everyone concerned. A kindness is an opportunity to build a relationship; if that opportunity is missed, it becomes a source of tension. The tension is resolved when we can express our needs, receive from others, and exchange words of appreciation.

My people may be called “Jews” after the act of speaking our appreciation, but it bears noticing that the word “thank” does not appear in the Torah prior to Leah using it. Adam, Noah, Avraham, Isaac… in the Torah, none of them say “thank you” to G-d or to anyone else. It took all these generations, and not a little emotional pain and suffering to bring Leah to the point where she could do it – and she was the first to do so!

The guidebook that is the Torah exists (at least in part) because when we did not have it, humanity was lost. The early parts of Genesis tell us of man, left to his own devices, in a state of nature. We gravitated toward evil and violence, self-aggrandizement and hedonistic narcissism without limit.

It took an evolution over many generations to achieve a single person with the greatness of Leah, a person who was willing to be openly vulnerable and needy, who was willing to do whatever could be done to grow in her relationships.

But because she was the first and so very rare, it was clear to G-d that mankind does not invariably arrive at “Thank you” by ourselves. To get there as a people, we needed the Torah, full of laws designed to help us see the good that G-d and others do, and to act out that appreciation. From bringing the first fruits to sacrifices, to commandments to love one another as well as the stranger… the Torah is all about institutionalizing gratitude, making it the foundation of what it means to be a good and kind person.

Out of the chaotic post-Eden mess came Avraham and then his descendants. Avraham is the first in the Torah to use the word “please” (when he asks his wife to lie about their relationship). When he does that, he shows his need. Sara acquiesces, but even so, Avraham does not thank her: the first “thank you” in the Torah comes only three generations later.

Indeed, it took the leadership of Judah, the man named for “gratitude,” to conclude the trials with Joseph and to reunite the family. Gratitude was the prerequisite – in name and in deed – for the Jewish people to go from a tribe to a nation.

The Torah shows us an entirely different dimension to appreciation. The very same word is used when Moses invests himself in his successor, Joshua. Such investiture is giving of oneself, and it is both the same word as “thanks,” and also connected with the word “samach” which is what Moses does by laying hands on Yehoshua. It is the same verb when we “invest” ourselves in our sacrifices, or the priests invest sins into the sacrificial animals on Yom Kippur. This is done through touch, making a physical connection, a transference from one to the other. It all adds up to a simple, rich meaning: When we show gratitude, we invest ourselves into the recipient. This helps explain why vulnerability is a two-way street, a connection between two people that is fraught with uncertainty and danger and risk – as well as reward.

Saying “thank you” is a liberational event, releasing the pressure from the persons who say “thank you,” allowing them to carry on their life without the resentment that leads to awkwardness and hate.

P.S. There is another form of gratitude in the Torah, one that predates Leah. Avraham is the first, and he bows many times, both in subservience and also in appreciation. This same action, of bowing in gratitude, is echoed when we bring the first fruits during giving thanks to G-d for the harvest, as well as many other places.  

 <another @iwe and @susanquinn production. Cross-posted at www.CreativeJudaism.org >

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Love is the drug. We now know beyond doubt that HCQ works & always worked NEVER FORGET that the other side, the fear-mongers, the lockdown proponents, the Big Pharma shills, the control freaks DELIBERATELY SUPPRESSED an effective treatment by lying about it & even banning it, killing 10,000s https://t.co/kZkL23tOKR — Rogue Scholar Books (@RogueScholarPr) November […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. The Death of a Friend

 

I got some shocking news the other day: a childhood friend had died. I found out through a direct message on Facebook. His wife messaged me and sought out my physical address. She is putting together a memory book and soliciting entries from his friends.

I say the news was shocking, and it was. And yet it shouldn’t have been, I guess. I forget I am a septuagenarian now, locked in my head as a younger, more fit man. My friend was a year older, and he suffered from Multiple Sclerosis — a diagnosis he got as a young fairly newly married man. Although I am not intimately familiar with the disease, it clearly is not a diagnosis that is indicative of an extended life. So I am imagining that by sheer length, my friend had a pretty good run. But how is longevity to be regarded when suffering a debilitating disease — either for the sufferer or their caregiver?

I must now make a shameful confession: I can be careless with friends. I suppose for some people this form of carelessness calls into question the concept of friendship itself. I know of people who never let anyone go, who make persistent contact. That is not me. When I am in proximity I enjoy my friends immensely and engage with them frequently. But when life has taken me away from them or they from me, they enter the memory world. I do not like them less nor cease to cherish what they meant to me, but their reality and substance have changed. I am sure that is a defect in me, but not one I seem able to transcend.

And so it is, that hearing of my friend’s death I am forced to reach back and recover memories of him. It is a different kind of task. It is not so much hard to recall as it is a process to recall. Memories are packed neatly in boxes and on shelves in my mind like a closet with the light out. So I have to open the door, turn on the light and do a bit of rummaging.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. What Leadership Ought to Be

 

What is the ideal leader? A person “who shall go out before them and come in before them, and who shall take them out and bring them in,” (Num 27:17). In other words, a good leader is someone we want to follow, who inspires us to do so. A leader should set an example that we want to emulate.

A bad leader, on the other hand, does not lead. Like a prison guard with a whip or a rifle, he leads from behind, using “or else” as his weapon. It is the difference between a leader we love, and a leader we fear.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

On my way to an interview, about half way there when I look down and see that my cup holder is empty. Pop open the glove box. Nothing in there either. I always leave one in the car. Eight months into this and I am still making rookie mistakes. I left the house without a […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

After World War I, a poet named T.S Eliot wrote about the framentation of life, the faltering of motivation, the failure of the Grand Design to allow forth anything approximating courage or balance: In his poem “The Hollow Men” the ending is a reflection on that theme: the faltering of motivation when the Grand Desisgn […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Dear National Review Editors, Please cancel my subscription. I can’t believe I have been a supporter, reader and now buyer of your product when you conduct such shoddy, incompetent and disgusting reporting as you have done since the USA election of November 3rd, 2020. Do you not know who your customers are?!?! I have been […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Slowing Down

 

Over time, I’ve been nagged by an annoying thought and it just won’t go away. I’ve tried to ignore it, discount it, and ridicule it, but it is persistent. The other evening, I was walking from one room to another, and noticed my gait—slow and gentle. And there was the truth: I was slowing down, undeniably, and in some ways, disturbingly.

Now you have to understand that most of my life I have put a high value in doing things—almost anything—quickly. I might not be the smartest person, but I was fast and efficient and could run circles around many people. I took pride is this talent for a long time. Finally, I began to notice that I was striving to do things quickly that just were not all that important; they certainly did not demand my meeting a deadline. I also realized that trying to do everything at warp speed was causing me a great deal of stress, but I was the only one who seemed to care about this ability. So, I made a concerted effort to slow myself down. I realized how valuable this goal was when one day, I had rushed home from a work-out and had another obligation to fulfill—not one I was particularly interested in. I decided I simply was not going to rush, but instead took my time. Out of curiosity, I checked the clock when I was ready to leave, and was astounded to realize that I had showered and changed in record time! It wasn’t possible! But, in fact, I discovered when I was simply attentive to what I was doing, timeliness would often take care of itself.

So, what does my discovery of 25 years ago have to do with my slowing down now?

My current slowing down is not voluntary.

* * * * *

The slowing down that I’m experiencing is touching on every aspect of my life. When I go on my morning walks, I’ve changed my gait. We have an increasing number of uneven sidewalks, and I’ve had two spills with a scraped chin and knees. I also don’t think it’s a good idea to walk in the street instead. I’ve realized that when I take large steps, it messes with my center of gravity. So now I am walking just a bit slower and taking smaller steps; it’s only lengthened my walk by a few minutes (depending on whether I stop to pet the local dogs).

The more disturbing changes, however, are my mind. I’m not panicking; I know the early signs of dementia and Alzheimer’s and they don’t describe me. But I am simply not thinking as quickly as I used to think. My brain is less agile, less timely, and it makes me uncomfortable, as I wait for my mind to engage at my preferred rate. Naturally, my physical state, alert or tired, also affects my thinking. There’s no denying, however, that I’m just not as mindful or alert.

There is also my temporarily forgetting a name, a number, the name of a place, a recent occurrence. I know those are a normal part of the aging process—until they are not. I’ve been dropping things, too, and in part I’m just not paying as much attention to my actions.

It’s not like I’m not making an effort to hold off the inevitable: in addition to walking two miles, five days a week, I exercise in the gym. I’ve even recovered 50% bone density in my right hip in my last bone density scan. I also do prayer and meditation every day.

But all those efforts are clearly not going to hold off the aging process indefinitely.

* * * * *

Don’t think this gradual transformation is only depressing; there are a number of pluses. I give myself permission to take my time doing many things. I also take more time to notice the beauty around me on a sunny day. I’m more likely to notice a single bud on the desert rose plant; my favorite duck (named Daphne) out on the pond; the joy of scratching the ears of a dog. I speak my mind more often, although I try to be kind in my word choice. I let others help me out with demanding tasks, since I have nothing to prove. Younger folks hold open doors for me, or help me lift a heavy object, or simply ask if they can help. I like the idea, as my hair grays, that I am a fount of aged wisdom (okay, maybe that’s going too far!) and people look to me for input. That kind of respect is gratifying . . . . So new experiences emerge when I slow down.

* * * * *

So, I’m compelled to look more closely at the person who stares back at me in the mirror. Not just physically, but emotionally and spiritually. What does it mean to be 71 years old? How can I best appreciate reaching this milestone in my life, when slowing down is sufficiently evident that it can’t be ignored? How can I gracefully move into the future with the joy and anticipation of my seniority and compassion for myself for my limitations?

Those, my friends, are the questions I’m asking.

And I’m grateful to be alive to ask them.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

I posted an essay by Alexander Macris in the Link Library; the excerpt was “. . .US citizens have a right to say things that no one is able to permit them to say. Now, US citizens will get a right to own firearms that no one is able to manufacture and sell to them. […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Quote of the Day: Winston Churchill on Socialism

 

In 1925, Churchill officially rejoined the Conservative Party in Britain. In a speech in 1926, in “strongly working-class Bolton”, he says:

Let them abandon the utter fallacy, the grotesque, erroneous, fatal blunder of believing that by limiting the enterprise of man, by riveting the shackles of a false equality upon the efforts of all the different forms and different classes of human enterprise, they will increase the well-being of the world.

I think he had the right of it, and this was before the horrors of the Stalinist famines and purges.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Racism, White Guilt, and Academia: My letter to the President of Washington State University

 

I receive the Washington State Magazine from my (former) Alma Mater, Washington State University. Due to a phrase in the President’s Letter in the most recent issue, I sent the following letter to the President, because I don’t think that sentiment should go unremarked.

Mr. Kirk Schultz, President

Dear Mr. Schultz:

I am a graduate of WSU (BS, Psychology, 1971), and I receive the Washington State Magazine. In reading the last issue, I noticed something very interesting in the From the President column you wrote. You mention, in the very first paragraph, some conditions that are affecting WSU, the State, and the wider world. I was quite surprised that you mention the “continuing challenges of Covid-19, Systemic Racism, and state funding”. Now, it appears to me as though you are saying that systemic racism is a problem at WSU. Do you really admit that the University is systemically racist? Are you admitting that, 50 years after the Civil Rights Movement, that my Alma Mater is systemically racist? Do you believe that no progress has been made in the treatment and opportunities afforded to black people in America since 1964?

I seem to remember that your predecessor as President was a gentleman named Elson Floyd. I also seem to remember that Mr. Floyd was a black man. Now, if Mr. Floyd were here today, could you honestly admit, to his face, that WSU is Systemically Racist? And what might he say to you if you did? Wouldn’t the admission that WSU is systemically racist be a total affront to the sensibilities of your esteemed predecessor, ignoring all the advances that enabled him to rise to the level of University President?

Personally, my belief is that you, as in most of academia these days, have fallen for the falsehoods perpetuated everywhere by the openly Marxist group that calls itself Black Lives Matter. That Marxist group has been behind months of riots, looting, and burning cities all over America, including in Seattle and Portland, supposedly to protest the deaths of some black men (most of whom had criminal records and were engaging in unlawful activity), at the hands of police; also note that most homicides of black men are not at the hands of police, but at the hands of other black men. It makes me sad that my Alma Mater has been basically taken over by the Leftists and Marxists. There is little that I can do about this, since the takeover has been obvious for many years.

I do think that you should take a good, hard look at your University, and give some thought to what has been happening. WSU is not, and never was, any kind of racist. Besides, if it is racist, why ever would I want to donate money to a racist institution? Or why would any alumni donate to a racist institution? I have given up donating to WSU, because I try not to support Leftist institutions, and I refuse “white guilt”.

Next year, I will be a Golden Grad. I have given some thought to returning to Campus for Homecoming next year. I will not drive 300 miles to celebrate at a racist institution, however. If by then the governor has relaxed his unilateral restrictions over all of Society, and you have given second thoughts to whether WSU is really systemically racist, I might come.

I thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. A Week of Gratitude: Day 7 – A Clever Wife

 

My wife loves Halloween. She adores it. She has an actress inside of her and loves playing a new character each year. She starts talking to us in October about the next year’s costumes. This gets debated off and on until something feels right or time picks the costumes for us. She likes us to dress up in themes and over the years we have been ladybugs, the Incredibles, Doctor Who, Star Wars, and this past Halloween, Dia de los Muertos skeletons. From as early as June through Halloween she squirrels away bits and pieces of costumes until a large push at the end gets it done. I like Halloween, but being busy with work I find it hard to muster the time she needs for me to help her. Our children love Halloween too but they hate doing the work to get ready for it and sometimes resist going as a theme because, well, they are teenagers. Each year my wife works really hard to make each of us a wonderful costume while getting variable amounts of help in return. Often there is grumbling about the effort when we want to do something else. Unfortunately, I occasionally add to the discontent.

This past year was a little different because of the lockdowns. We weren’t sure how much Halloween would happen so my wife delayed costume preparation until it started to look like there would be some Halloween after all. Our costumes consisted of gaiters to cover our mouths that had Dia de los Muertos skeletons printed on them. She added some pretty impressive face paint and dark, formal clothes to finish it out. The attached photo is my daughter in her costume. To her credit, my daughter put a lot of effort into her costume while my wife did most of the work for the rest of us.

This photo shows my daughter in her Halloween costume.
This is my daughter in her costume this year. She did the face makeup herself. The car also had a fog machine under it that we turned on once it got dark. My wife also made the wood surrounding the fake fire. She’s pretty awesome.

To celebrate Halloween this year, our church did a drive-by trick-or-treat for the kids. The teenagers in the congregation and those of us who work with them decorated our cars to be trick-or-treat outposts. Families would drive by and we would pass out candy to their children. It was a lot of fun. The kids really liked my costume and loved to tell me about theirs (that’s my favorite part of Halloween). As I was interacting with a really cute and precocious five-year-old princess I realized that I was only there and able to enjoy myself so much because of my wife’s hard work and cleverness. I was so grateful that she had done so much to make Halloween a fun day. I would be really lazy about celebrations without a wife who works so hard to make them special. I’m so grateful to have her.

Day 6

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

In this house, Black lives, women’s rights, open borders, science, gay rights, and kindness aren’t just words, they’re slogans!

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

I was asked by a liberal lawyer friend today: Please consider that if this was truly a source of vote fraud someone would have claimed it in court. They didn’t. These are not stupid people. The people involved for both sides are experts in election law. If they saw a viable claim, they would have […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.