Senator Fix-It

This week, the rare single guest show. But when that guest is Senator Ben Sasse, he has enough brain power to fill two segments and that’s exactly what the does on today’s episode. Mostly, we discuss his WSJ Op-Ed, Make The Senate Great Again, which is a manifesto on how to fix the World’s Greatest  Deliberative Body. Also, some thoughts on Woodward v. Trump and the less than great mayor of the City That Never Sleeps.

Music from this week’s show: The Sand Hills of Old Nebraska by Ole Rasmussen

Subscribe to The Ricochet Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Please Support Our Sponsor!

DonorsTrust

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 148 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    This is what I’m talking about:

     

     

     

    • #61
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Like I said, I think there’s a good reason why Sasse does so “well” in Jonah’s “Half-Baked Ideas” segments.

    You need to have some good analysis about why we don’t have a really disbursed prosperity and you need to have something to say about cultural issues.

    I do?  Or Sasse does?

    I think the point is just that Sasse is chock-full of half-baked ideas.

    • #62
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Do you really want more of this?  

     

     

    Brutal.

    • #63
  4. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Like I said, I think there’s a good reason why Sasse does so “well” in Jonah’s “Half-Baked Ideas” segments.

    You need to have some good analysis about why we don’t have a really disbursed prosperity and you need to have something to say about cultural issues.

    I do? Or Sasse does?

    I think the point is just that Sasse is chock-full of half-baked ideas.

    Sasse.

    Sorry about that.

    • #64
  5. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio…
    @ArizonaPatriot

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    When state legislatures chose US Senators, no one served more than 2 terms. 12 year max.

     

    That is not correct. For example, Daniel Webster was a Senator from 1827 to 1841 and again from 1845 to 1850.  John Sherman was a Senator from Ohio from 1861 to 1877 and again from 1881 to 1897.

    • #65
  6. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Peter says “I’ll keep this question short” and then starts telling a story about his daughter…

    It’s his style!

    • #66
  7. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Arahant (View Comment):

    That buffering and lagging transition to commercial, James. That was something.

    I was kinda surprised James interrupted a Q&A session with a US Senator to do an ad.  Then again, there may be contractual requirements to talk about XYZ before minute ABC . . .

    • #67
  8. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    I’ve said this before. Listen to his (I think) second interview on Jonah Goldberg’s podcast.

    Jonah has called Ben Sasse his spirit animal.  When he first started his podcast, it seems that part of the plan was to have Sasse on as a regular.

    He hasn’t been on for awhile, and probably it’s for the best.  Professionally, it’s not good for a journalist, even an opinion journalist, to be too closely associated with a particular politician.

    • #68
  9. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    Stad (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    That buffering and lagging transition to commercial, James. That was something.

    I was kinda surprised James interrupted a Q&A session with a US Senator to do an ad. Then again, there may be contractual requirements to talk about XYZ before minute ABC . . .

    I don’t know.  U.S. Senators appear on programs all the time with advertising that play in the middle of an interview.  It’s par for the course.

    • #69
  10. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    That buffering and lagging transition to commercial, James. That was something.

    I was kinda surprised James interrupted a Q&A session with a US Senator to do an ad. Then again, there may be contractual requirements to talk about XYZ before minute ABC . . .

    I don’t know. U.S. Senators appear on programs all the time with advertising that play in the middle of an interview. It’s par for the course.

    Then again, it’s quite possible – especially since Rob didn’t interrupt – that bit was inserted later.

    • #70
  11. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    I’ve said this before. Listen to his (I think) second interview on Jonah Goldberg’s podcast.

    Jonah has called Ben Sasse his spirit animal. When he first started his podcast, it seems that part of the plan was to have Sasse on as a regular.

    He hasn’t been on for awhile, and probably it’s for the best. Professionally, it’s not good for a journalist, even an opinion journalist, to be too closely associated with a particular politician.

    Just for clarity, this isn’t the thrust of what I’m talking about in that post. 

    Jonah Goldberg doesn’t wear it on his sleeve, but he’s really into Austrian economics. He asked Ben Sasse some great questions that could only come from somebody like that, and Sasse just completely flubbed it. I had a conversation on Twitter with a moderately famous libertarian and she observed the same thing.

    You have got to get it straight in your head about how government is dysfunctional in this era. 

    I’m not an expert on this, but another example might be Senator Mike Lee. He talks a good game, but he’s almost literally the senator for Google more than anything else. 

    • #71
  12. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Isn’t this a binary election of whether or not you want single payer shoved down your throat? 

    I was looking at Twitter today and that is the most stark, irreversible thing that can happen. I think that’s the actual reality and risk. Why wouldn’t you think that’s the way to look at it?

    • #72
  13. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Like I said, I think there’s a good reason why Sasse does so “well” in Jonah’s “Half-Baked Ideas” segments.

    It’s Wisconsin Congressman Mike Gallagher who does the Half-Baked Ideas episodes of The Remnant, not Sasse. 🙄

    • #73
  14. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    Stad (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    That buffering and lagging transition to commercial, James. That was something.

    I was kinda surprised James interrupted a Q&A session with a US Senator to do an ad. Then again, there may be contractual requirements to talk about XYZ before minute ABC . . .

    The spot was added after the show. We did not make Senator Sasse sit through a hair loss commercial. But I’m happy to know that the edit was so seamless, you couldn’t tell. @jameslileks

    • #74
  15. Brent Chambers Inactive
    Brent Chambers
    @BrentChambers

    That Sasse thinks more collegiality means he won’t get taken by Dems indicates he is just a suckered, an easy mark.  I have no respect for his naivete. 

    • #75
  16. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Brent Chambers (View Comment):

    That Sasse thinks more collegiality means he won’t get taken by Dems indicates he is just a suckered, an easy mark. I have no respect for his naivete.

    Those “decorum conservatives” always get rolled by the Dems because they think that honorable Democrats still exist. Ha ha ha.

    • #76
  17. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    This discussion is very educational.

    • #77
  18. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    We really need to reach across the aisle.

     

     

    • #78
  19. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    The gloves come off: His name is now Shitt Romney.

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    Brent Chambers (View Comment):

    That Sasse thinks more collegiality means he won’t get taken by Dems indicates he is just a suckered, an easy mark. I have no respect for his naivete.

    Those “decorum conservatives” always get rolled by the Dems because they think that honorable Democrats still exist. Ha ha ha.

    I no longer think they are that naive.They are frauds and always have been. I have complete contempt for them all.

    • #79
  20. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    Term limits are not a perfect solution but in the case of California I think things would be worse without them.

    A bigger problem in California is the size of government, i.e the number of state employees, almost all unionized

    Public sector unions are worse.

    I think that things have gotten worse in California with term limits. Whether it would be even worse without them is conjecture. California is too big for the type of centralized government it engages in. The problem is that their legislature is professionalized, not the number of years a particular legislator serves.

    When it comes to the legislature, they should go with the Texas model, another big state which manages a lighter governing touch within the state.

    They meet regularly every two years just after an election for 140 days. In addition, the Texas governor doesn’t have that much in the way of inherent constitutional powers.

    With a state as big as California, they should be devolving even more power to their counties and cities.

    As for the civil service in general, I have read at least one proposal where civil service job holders would also have term limits. I’m not sure how practical that is.

    public sector unions have too much power in California

     

    • #80
  21. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    This is what I’m talking about:

     

     

     

    Crowder is a conservative comedian right?

     

    • #81
  22. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    This is what I’m talking about:

     

     

     

    blue collar union workers are part of the Trump coalition

     

    • #82
  23. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    When state legislatures chose US Senators, no one served more than 2 terms. 12 year max.

     

    That is not correct. For example, Daniel Webster was a Senator from 1827 to 1841 and again from 1845 to 1850. John Sherman was a Senator from Ohio from 1861 to 1877 and again from 1881 to 1897.

    Why is the math off?  14 years. 5 years. 16 years.  16 years.

     

    • #83
  24. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    When state legislatures chose US Senators, no one served more than 2 terms. 12 year max.

     

    That is not correct. For example, Daniel Webster was a Senator from 1827 to 1841 and again from 1845 to 1850. John Sherman was a Senator from Ohio from 1861 to 1877 and again from 1881 to 1897.

    Why is the math off? 14 years. 5 years. 16 years. 16 years.

     

    Looks like both guys left the Senate at various times to serve in the Cabinet, as Secretary of State or Treasury.

    Part of the thinking behind Senators’ six-year term was that the people who elected them, state legislators, would know them well enough to trust them for six years.  

    When the progressives managed to pass an amendment to provide for direct election of Senators, they left the six-year term in place, creating a situation in which a Senator could get reelected by pretending to be a conservative in the sixth year of his term.

    Several Midwestern liberals took advantage of the situation, until 1980 when the Republicans finally ran ads telling voters what they had actually been up to for the last six years.

    If Frank Church, who saw the main enemy as the CIA not the USSR, and Birch Bayh, had remained in the Senate, it’s likely Ronald Reagan could not have won the Cold War.

    • #84
  25. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    This is what I’m talking about:

     

     

     

    blue collar union workers are part of the Trump coalition

     

    Crowder is babbling about free trade. The fact is blue-collar workers are getting hosed by bad policies that don’t accommodate the fact that we are importing wage deflation and job destruction.

    When you listen to Trump’s economic advisers they are working on it. You can’t just shove idealistic crap about free trade and automation down these guys throat’s and expect society to hold together.

    • #85
  26. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    This is what I’m talking about:

     

     

     

    blue collar union workers are part of the Trump coalition

     

    Crowder is babbling about free trade. The fact is blue-collar workers are getting hosed by bad policies that don’t accommodate the fact that we are importing wage deflation and job destruction.

    When you listen to Trump’s economic advisers they are working on it. You can’t just shove idealistic crap about free trade and automation down these guys throat’s and expect society to hold together.

    Libertarians have a blind spot where “free” trade with slave states is concerned.  As we have seen with China and Cuba, our trade goes to strengthen the system of oppression.

    • #86
  27. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    Al Sparks (View Comment):
    If you want to send power back to the states, and depending on the state, the cities, return our system back to where citizens send most of their tax dollars back to the states and cities.

    The easiest, most logical way to send power back to the states is to make it illegal for anyone running for office within a state to accept campaign contributions outside that state. No senator or representative in D.C.  should be there because of money given to his campaign from any state other than the one he purports to represent. 

    • #87
  28. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    DonG (skeptic) (View Comment):
    Ben Sasse is such a blowhard. He is well-educated but rarely says anything useful.

    Down Texas way I think they call guys like him all hat and no cattle.

    • #88
  29. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Taras (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    This is what I’m talking about:

     

     

     

    blue collar union workers are part of the Trump coalition

     

    Crowder is babbling about free trade. The fact is blue-collar workers are getting hosed by bad policies that don’t accommodate the fact that we are importing wage deflation and job destruction.

    When you listen to Trump’s economic advisers they are working on it. You can’t just shove idealistic crap about free trade and automation down these guys throat’s and expect society to hold together.

    Libertarians have a blind spot where “free” trade with slave states is concerned. As we have seen with China and Cuba, our trade goes to strengthen the system of oppression.

    That’s just for starters. 

    The whole system is based on inflation. Our government and our financial system. The amount of globalized labor that will work for nothing is infinite. You have to deal with that realistically. Republicans that just babble idealistically about trade are cruel and are committing political suicide. It’s not even logical if you study it. 

    We have done every single thing wrong on this since the Soviet Union fell and now it’s a much bigger headache than it should have been. Central planning is worthless.

    • #89
  30. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Taras (View Comment):
    Libertarians have a blind spot where “free” trade with slave states is concerned. As we have seen with China and Cuba, our trade goes to strengthen the system of oppression.

    It was completely nuts to trade with a fascist mafia state. We should have just traded food and energy so they don’t die and that’s it. This was a huge mistake, and try to get any Never Trumper to say that.

    I forget where I heard this, but someone was saying Nixon really screwed up normalizing relations with China. 

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.