Losing The Enlightenment

There’s a lot at stake in this week’s jam-packed podcast. First up we’ve got Byron York (he of the Byron York Show on this very network) to update us on the administration that sees crises everywhere – except for the one at the border. Then the hosts get to chat with Andrew Gutmann, the New York parent who made waves recently for a publicized letter excoriating the fancy Brearly School for prioritizing wokeness and “safety” over education. Plus James gets to exhale as Minneapolis calms down, and Rob and Peter reflect on the late Walter Mondale.

Music from this week’s episode: Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2) by Pink Floyd

Subscribe to The Ricochet Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 87 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    My favorite thing about higher education was reason Magazine’s Nick Gillespie interview of Thaddeus Russell of Renegade University. It’s a podcast from about 2017. Accreditation is a scam that needs to be exposed. Particularly in this era. They need to atomize is the whole system.

    • #61
  2. Chris Member
    Chris
    @Chris

    SParker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    Late to the party as usual, but I think Trump was speculating and used the word “disinfectant”.

    There’s a big variety of disinfectants and a lot of housekeepers are trying to find alternatives to bleach products. So most of the public would not have landed there without being led.

    It’s been pointed out that they were also discussing that UV disinfectant procedure, which at least for a while was looked at for internal use: shining into the lungs or something, maybe, I don’t remember all the details. But stupid people and the media (but I repeat myself) were also getting “confused” – perhaps deliberately in some cases – about hydroxyCHLOROquine, and how that kinda sounded like chlorine bleach/Clorox, maybe…

    A couple in Phoenix ended up 1/2 dead and 1/2 hospitalized thinking it was chloroquine phosphate everyone was talking about. It’s a fish tank cleaner. They had a fish tank.

    In my view, it doesn’t really matter about the bleach, imbibed or injected*. Talking off the top your head in a moment of public panic should be the rap. Not knowing, or at least suspecting, that your public health advisors are talking out of their hats (to be polite) and off their policy reservation is the considerably more serious rap. DJT wasn’t alone among world leaders in this unnecessary disaster in being unable to evaluate the situation correctly and to make better tradeoffs.

    *note on injecting things. A 90-minute 3% hydrogen peroxide IV drip is currently used in alternative medicine to boost the immune system and as a cancer cure. It was also toyed with in straight medicine before antibiotics. Based on the actual fact that the body produces hydrogen peroxide as part of the immune system response. No evidence to suggest the drip does anything good. And the body is probably much better at getting the dosage right.

    The AZ story had some nuance… not sure how it resolved after this part of the story hit the news…. https://www.newsmax.com/us/chloroquine-fish-tank-cleaner-murder-arizona/2020/04/30/id/965362/

    • #62
  3. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    Late to the party as usual, but I think Trump was speculating and used the word “disinfectant”.

    There’s a big variety of disinfectants and a lot of housekeepers are trying to find alternatives to bleach products. So most of the public would not have landed there without being led.

    It’s been pointed out that they were also discussing that UV disinfectant procedure, which at least for a while was looked at for internal use: shining into the lungs or something, maybe, I don’t remember all the details. But stupid people and the media (but I repeat myself) were also getting “confused” – perhaps deliberately in some cases – about hydroxyCHLOROquine, and how that kinda sounded like chlorine bleach/Clorox, maybe…

    Healight initial testing had positive results and is still being tested last I heard.

    • #63
  4. Nanocelt TheContrarian Member
    Nanocelt TheContrarian
    @NanoceltTheContrarian

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    Not exactly correct. Adam Smith termed any religious argument casuistry and torched his mentor, Francis Hutchison, for his transcendent arguments. Hume famously eschewed any human capacity beyond the 5 senses. And was the quintessential skeptic. What came to be called The Science of Man, the title of the Rockefeller project to discover the building blocks of human heredity for Eugenics purposes, principally at Cal Tech, with Lin’s Pauling as the principle beneficiary of Rockefeller Foundation funds, was based explicitly on the secular philosophy of Hume and still guides the Eugenics that underpins organ and tissue harvesting from abortions for research.

    I would argue that John Knox (Reformation) had more to do with the Scottish culture than did Hume, but now Hume prevails and has been extend to his ultimate conclusion

    Only two details I can address.

    First, don’t leave out Thomas Reid.

    Second, Hume is only a skeptic in one weak sense of the term.

    Thank you. Very enjoyable video. Alas, Hume has been extended and today, human consciousness is deemed (see Daniel Dennett–Consciousness Explained) naught but an illusion. Making Man a miserable beast of no significance. In my view, Reid was more important for the Scottish Enlightenment than Hume, but that’s just my opinion.The Phenomenology of Husserl was utterly squelched by his pupil Martin Heiddeger, who drove a stake through the heart of human transcendence. This philosopher to the Nazis was a major influence on Rorty in his version of American Pragmatism (Obama claimed to be a Pragmatist–by which I believe he meant a follower of Rorty, arguably the very perverse dean of American Philosophers in the second half of the 20th Century, who called himself a Pragmatist after William James and John Dewey, although his philosophy was essentially the antithesis of James’–see “The Variety of Religious Experience”).The fundamental axiom of Einstein’s General Relativity is:  The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames.  Essentially the regularity of nature and cause and effect of Hume become axiomatic. Which is why Einstein disliked Quantum Mechanics, which undermined the causality of General Relativity. These two great theories of modern physics are completely incompatible. Add in Shrodinger’s Cat (human consciousness directly affects quantum physical processes), and a great conundrum results, that drove Shrodinger toward Vedantic mysticism, and which Neils Bohr essentially declared off limits to investigation by physicists in his Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. 

     

    • #64
  5. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Blondie (View Comment):

    I want to echo @ peterrobinson‘s intro of Byron York. His podcast is one of, if not the, best on Ricochet. I dare you to listen and not come away learning something new. He has always been the epitome of a professional. The other so called journalists out there could take a page from him.

    Byron York is the best political reporter in America, bar none. Also, his voice is super-dreamy.

    • #65
  6. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Blondie (View Comment):

    I want to echo @ peterrobinson‘s intro of Byron York. His podcast is one of, if not the, best on Ricochet. I dare you to listen and not come away learning something new. He has always been the epitome of a professional. The other so called journalists out there could take a page from him.

    Byron York is the best political reporter in America, bar none. Also, his voice is super-dreamy.

    You misspelled Kim Strassel and Dan Heninger.

    • #66
  7. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Blondie (View Comment):

    I want to echo @ peterrobinson‘s intro of Byron York. His podcast is one of, if not the, best on Ricochet. I dare you to listen and not come away learning something new. He has always been the epitome of a professional. The other so called journalists out there could take a page from him.

    Byron York is the best political reporter in America, bar none. Also, his voice is super-dreamy.

    You misspelled Kim Strassel and Dan Heninger.

    Nope, sorry. Kim Strassel’s fine, but Byron’s got her beat. (I admit that I generally prefer dudes.)

    I thought Heninger was more of an opinion guy, not a reporter.

    • #67
  8. Nanocelt TheContrarian Member
    Nanocelt TheContrarian
    @NanoceltTheContrarian

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):
    We haven’t lost the “Enlightenment”. The Enlightenment is proceeding apace unimpeded. We are simply suffering the logical consequences of the ideas of the “Enlightenment,” foremost of which is the elimination of religion (Christian religion, to be specific) and belief in God.

    The Scottish enlightenment liked G-d, capitalism and was wary of taxes, Kings and businessman coordinating with one another. The Enlightenment you are talking about is French. French philosophy is one of the great banes of all humanity.

    Not exactly correct. Adam Smith termed any religious argument casuistry and torched his mentor, Francis Hutchison, for his transcendent arguments. Hume famously eschewed any human capacity beyond the 5 senses. And was the quintessential skeptic. What came to be called The Science of Man, the title of the Rockefeller project to discover the building blocks of human heredity for Eugenics purposes, principally at Cal Tech, with Lin’s Pauling as the principle beneficiary of Rockefeller Foundation funds, was based explicitly on the secular philosophy of Hume and still guides the Eugenics that underpins organ and tissue harvesting from abortions for research.

    I would argue that John Knox (Reformation) had more to do with the Scottish culture than did Hume, but now Hume prevails and has been extend to his ultimate conclusion

    You certainly have gave this more thought than me.

    I’m a bit obsessed. 

    • #68
  9. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Wolfsheim (View Comment):

    Here are thoughts from a retired academic, albeit outside of the United States, regarding education…Most contemporary Americans in my admittedly limited experience place little value on (supposedly) conventional knowledge, whatever pieties they may express to the contrary. I once spent two years in a reputable American university, the students of preppie background, in which almost no one could come close to telling me when World War II took place—and, most significantly, they didn’t care: they thought I was posing a trivia question. And that was a well over a third of century ago. I belong to the generation that still learned Latin and Greek. I had students who angrily dismissed the term “adverb” as esoteric linguistic jargon…When those who wind up with well-paying jobs have waved the American equivalent of Mao’s Little Red Book and majored in sexuality and gender studies at Yale, how does one convince one’s children that they should go to a new, independent school where they will learn about Thomas Aquinas, especially if they have a poster of “Dr.” Jill Biden on the wall?

    Reminds me of the professor who was horrified to hear students say things such as, “Well, of course I dislike Hitler, but who am I to tell him how to run his country?” What did the fool expect when his students have been taught “situational ethics”, that there are no moral absolutes, and the nonsense of cultural relativism? 

    • #69
  10. OwnedByDogs Lincoln
    OwnedByDogs
    @JuliaBlaschke

    Chris (View Comment):
    In my view, it doesn’t really matter about the bleach, imbibed or injected*. Talking off the top your head in a moment of public panic should be the rap. Not knowing, or at least suspecting, that your public health advisors are talking out of their hats (to be polite) and off their policy reservation is the considerably more serious rap. DJT wasn’t alone among world leaders in this unnecessary disaster in being unable to evaluate the situation correctly and to make better tradeoffs.

    This ^^.  Trump gives the dishonest media the ammunition all the time.  His Covid briefings were a disaster. He should have stuck with carefully scripted speeches and let the medical people talk about treatments. But then he wouldn’t be Trump.

    • #70
  11. Nanocelt TheContrarian Member
    Nanocelt TheContrarian
    @NanoceltTheContrarian

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):
    We haven’t lost the “Enlightenment”. The Enlightenment is proceeding apace unimpeded. We are simply suffering the logical consequences of the ideas of the “Enlightenment,” foremost of which is the elimination of religion (Christian religion, to be specific) and belief in God.

    The Scottish enlightenment liked G-d, capitalism and was wary of taxes, Kings and businessman coordinating with one another.

    https://ricochet.com/930020/meet-thomas-reid/#

    The Enlightenment you are talking about is French. French philosophy is one of the great banes of all humanity.

    Thanks. Very enjoyable. You might be interested in more–much more–on these topics. See Noesis, the book.   Noesis, the book

    • #71
  12. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Never did Pink Floyd’s “We Don’t Need No Education” come across more appropriately…

    If you want to know how to start a school – one that will thrive and multiply – then contact Dale Ahlquist of the American Chesterton Society.  He is a former fellow parishioner of mine who started the Chesterton Academy in a Minneapolis suburb. (Full disclosure – I taught art there for its first two years). His school went from being a literal one-room schoolroom in a former public school building, to a thriving institution that has spawned similar academies across the country and even overseas.  The curriculum stresses an orthodox Catholic, classical education. Regardless of this being a Catholic institution, Dale’s expertise here is relevant to anyone seeking to create an alternative to the woke education establishments.

    By the way, Trump appointed Dale Ahlquist to serve on the National Board of Education Sciences. 

     

    • #72
  13. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Blondie (View Comment):

    I want to echo @ peterrobinson‘s intro of Byron York. His podcast is one of, if not the, best on Ricochet. I dare you to listen and not come away learning something new. He has always been the epitome of a professional. The other so called journalists out there could take a page from him.

    Byron York is the best political reporter in America, bar none. Also, his voice is super-dreamy.

    You misspelled Kim Strassel and Dan Heninger.

    They’re great, but they’re columnists, not reporters. 

    • #73
  14. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Blondie (View Comment):

    I want to echo @ peterrobinson‘s intro of Byron York. His podcast is one of, if not the, best on Ricochet. I dare you to listen and not come away learning something new. He has always been the epitome of a professional. The other so called journalists out there could take a page from him.

    Byron York is the best political reporter in America, bar none. Also, his voice is super-dreamy.

    You misspelled Kim Strassel and Dan Heninger.

    They’re great, but they’re columnists, not reporters.

    Strassel does some reporting.

     

    • #74
  15. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    Thank you. Very enjoyable video.

    And thank you!

    (Lots more where that came from.  Over an hour of Hume alone!)

    Alas, Hume has been extended and today, human consciousness is deemed (see Daniel Dennett–Consciousness Explained) naught but an illusion. Making Man a miserable beast of no significance. In my view, Reid was more important for the Scottish Enlightenment than Hume, but that’s just my opinion.The Phenomenology of Husserl was utterly squelched by his pupil Martin Heiddeger, who drove a stake through the heart of human transcendence. This philosopher to the Nazis was a major influence on Rorty in his version of American Pragmatism (Obama claimed to be a Pragmatist–by which I believe he meant a follower of Rorty, arguably the very perverse dean of American Philosophers in the second half of the 20th Century, who called himself a Pragmatist after William James and John Dewey, although his philosophy was essentially the antithesis of James’–see “The Variety of Religious Experience”).The fundamental axiom of Einstein’s General Relativity is: The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames. Essentially the regularity of nature and cause and effect of Hume become axiomatic. Which is why Einstein disliked Quantum Mechanics, which undermined the causality of General Relativity. These two great theories of modern physics are completely incompatible. Add in Shrodinger’s Cat (human consciousness directly affects quantum physical processes), and a great conundrum results, that drove Shrodinger toward Vedantic mysticism, and which Neils Bohr essentially declared off limits to investigation by physicists in his Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.

    Only a few points I am capable of addressing:

    First, Dennett is in the reductionist camp.  The eliminativists (Paul and Patricia Churchland, Peter Unger) say consciousness is an illusion. Dennett just tries (and fails) to show consciousness is a thing explainable in merely physical terms.

    Second, Husserl is pretty cool!

    Third, I think there is some merit in Heidegger’s thought.  (The “Letter on Humanism” is a lot of fun, and the critique of “onto-theology” is good.)

    Fourth, I think of Rorty as the bastard child of American Pragmatism–his mother is John Dewey, but his father is Friedrich Nietzsche.  Rorty wants what Dewey wants but thinks what Nietzsche thinks about the universe–not a healthy combination.

    Fifth, I also got lots of videos on James’ early writings (Rumble now, YouTube later).  But not so much on the Varieties.  And over on YouTube, I have a series of Dewey videos starting in a week.

    • #75
  16. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Speaking of education, my friend Mark Eckel is someone to keep in mind.

    http://markeckel.com/

    Resources for Christian educators there.  Applicable in any setting.

    • #76
  17. The Cynthonian Inactive
    The Cynthonian
    @TheCynthonian

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Speaking of education, my friend Mark Eckel is someone to keep in mind.

    http://markeckel.com/

    Resources for Christian educators there. Applicable in any setting.

    My sister and brother-in-law’s three children have all attended a K-12 private Christian school that uses a classical curriculum much like what Mr. Gutmann described, except with a Christian worldview and emphasis.   Students are required to take Logic, Philosophy, and Latin, amongst other topics that are unheard of in public K-12 schools.   The two eldest have graduated and are doing well.  The third is a junior and will graduate next year.   The eldest is breezing through her studies at a public university, while working part-time, and is regularly complimented by her instructors on her writing ability.

    Mr. Gutmann could use this type of school as a model, except for the Christian emphasis.

    That was a fantastic interview with him.   I very much admire his courage.

    • #77
  18. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Speaking of education, my friend Mark Eckel is someone to keep in mind.

    http://markeckel.com/

    Resources for Christian educators there. Applicable in any setting.

    My sister and brother-in-law’s three children have all attended a K-12 private Christian school that uses a classical curriculum much like what Mr. Gutmann described, except with a Christian worldview and emphasis. Students are required to take Logic, Philosophy, and Latin, amongst other topics that are unheard of in public K-12 schools. The two eldest have graduated and are doing well. The third is a junior and will graduate next year. The eldest is breezing through her studies at a public university, while working part-time, and is regularly complimented by her instructors on her writing ability.

    Mr. Gutmann could use this type of school as a model, except for the Christian emphasis.

    That was a fantastic interview with him. I very much admire his courage.

    Bring back the Trivium.  (My first post!)

    • #78
  19. Wolfsheim Member
    Wolfsheim
    @Wolfsheim

    Django (View Comment):

    Wolfsheim (View Comment):

    Here are thoughts from a retired academic, albeit outside of the United States, regarding education…Most contemporary Americans in my admittedly limited experience place little value on (supposedly) conventional knowledge, whatever pieties they may express to the contrary. I once spent two years in a reputable American university, the students of preppie background, in which almost no one could come close to telling me when World War II took place—and, most significantly, they didn’t care: they thought I was posing a trivia question. And that was a well over a third of century ago. I belong to the generation that still learned Latin and Greek. I had students who angrily dismissed the term “adverb” as esoteric linguistic jargon…When those who wind up with well-paying jobs have waved the American equivalent of Mao’s Little Red Book and majored in sexuality and gender studies at Yale, how does one convince one’s children that they should go to a new, independent school where they will learn about Thomas Aquinas, especially if they have a poster of “Dr.” Jill Biden on the wall?

    Reminds me of the professor who was horrified to hear students say things such as, “Well, of course I dislike Hitler, but who am I to tell him how to run his country?” What did the fool expect when his students have been taught “situational ethics”, that there are no moral absolutes, and the nonsense of cultural relativism?

    If the relativists were consistent, they would concede that knowledge comes in all shapes and sizes. They would be humbly grateful for the practical skills of those who can, for example, rid their dwellings of wasp infestations. They would not judge themselves superior for knowing how how “vespe” turns up in Dante (once). They would not insist that everyone, yes, everyone should sit in a classroom (or its ZOOM equivalent) until well into their twenties. No, their relativism is limited to claiming that it’s not important to know within four centuries when Dante lived, as long as one knows that Beatrice must have been a lesbian.

    • #79
  20. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Wolfsheim (View Comment):
    No, their relativism is limited to claiming that it’s not important to know within four centuries when Dante lived, as long as one knows that Beatrice must have been a lesbian.

    Is it coincidence that they emphasize something that destroys the whole story?

    • #80
  21. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    Vince Guerra (View Comment):

    I like Byron York, really I do, but you have to have swallowed the beltway media kool aid from a fire hose to believe those things about the most disrespected, pathetic excuse for a public figure on earth, a man who can’t even move the enthusiasm meter on his own YouTube channel.

    I turned it off because the commentary just didn’t gel with reality.

    You should read that Babylon Bee piece again. 

    • #81
  22. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Django (View Comment):

    Wolfsheim (View Comment):

    Here are thoughts from a retired academic, albeit outside of the United States, regarding education…Most contemporary Americans in my admittedly limited experience place little value on (supposedly) conventional knowledge, whatever pieties they may express to the contrary. I once spent two years in a reputable American university, the students of preppie background, in which almost no one could come close to telling me when World War II took place—and, most significantly, they didn’t care: they thought I was posing a trivia question. And that was a well over a third of century ago. I belong to the generation that still learned Latin and Greek. I had students who angrily dismissed the term “adverb” as esoteric linguistic jargon…When those who wind up with well-paying jobs have waved the American equivalent of Mao’s Little Red Book and majored in sexuality and gender studies at Yale, how does one convince one’s children that they should go to a new, independent school where they will learn about Thomas Aquinas, especially if they have a poster of “Dr.” Jill Biden on the wall?

    Reminds me of the professor who was horrified to hear students say things such as, “Well, of course I dislike Hitler, but who am I to tell him how to run his country?” What did the fool expect when his students have been taught “situational ethics”, that there are no moral absolutes, and the nonsense of cultural relativism?

    They might be more upset that Germany allowed SMOKING!!!  And would have gone to war for THAT.

    • #82
  23. Buckpasser Member
    Buckpasser
    @Buckpasser

    OwnedByDogs (View Comment):

    Chris (View Comment):
    In my view, it doesn’t really matter about the bleach, imbibed or injected*. Talking off the top your head in a moment of public panic should be the rap. Not knowing, or at least suspecting, that your public health advisors are talking out of their hats (to be polite) and off their policy reservation is the considerably more serious rap. DJT wasn’t alone among world leaders in this unnecessary disaster in being unable to evaluate the situation correctly and to make better tradeoffs.

    This ^^. Trump gives the dishonest media the ammunition all the time. His Covid briefings were a disaster. He should have stuck with carefully scripted speeches and let the medical people talk about treatments. But then he wouldn’t be Trump.

    I’m not sure that hearing more of Herr fauci would have made me feel better.

    • #83
  24. Nanocelt TheContrarian Member
    Nanocelt TheContrarian
    @NanoceltTheContrarian

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    Not exactly correct. Adam Smith termed any religious argument casuistry and torched his mentor, Francis Hutchison, for his transcendent arguments. Hume famously eschewed any human capacity beyond the 5 senses. And was the quintessential skeptic. What came to be called The Science of Man, the title of the Rockefeller project to discover the building blocks of human heredity for Eugenics purposes, principally at Cal Tech, with Lin’s Pauling as the principle beneficiary of Rockefeller Foundation funds, was based explicitly on the secular philosophy of Hume and still guides the Eugenics that underpins organ and tissue harvesting from abortions for research.

    I would argue that John Knox (Reformation) had more to do with the Scottish culture than did Hume, but now Hume prevails and has been extend to his ultimate conclusion

    Only two details I can address.

    First, don’t leave out Thomas Reid.

    Second, Hume is only a skeptic in one weak sense of the term.

    I must say your videos are marvelous. You have a gift. Don’t stop. 

    • #84
  25. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    Not exactly correct. Adam Smith termed any religious argument casuistry and torched his mentor, Francis Hutchison, for his transcendent arguments. Hume famously eschewed any human capacity beyond the 5 senses. And was the quintessential skeptic. What came to be called The Science of Man, the title of the Rockefeller project to discover the building blocks of human heredity for Eugenics purposes, principally at Cal Tech, with Lin’s Pauling as the principle beneficiary of Rockefeller Foundation funds, was based explicitly on the secular philosophy of Hume and still guides the Eugenics that underpins organ and tissue harvesting from abortions for research.

    I would argue that John Knox (Reformation) had more to do with the Scottish culture than did Hume, but now Hume prevails and has been extend to his ultimate conclusion

    Only two details I can address.

    First, don’t leave out Thomas Reid.

    Second, Hume is only a skeptic in one weak sense of the term.

    I must say your videos are marvelous. You have a gift. Don’t stop.

    Thank you.

    • #85
  26. OwnedByDogs Lincoln
    OwnedByDogs
    @JuliaBlaschke

     

    I’m not sure that hearing more of Herr fauci would have made me feel better.

    No. Me either. You’d think we could find some decent scientists. We are stuck with Fauci who should be long retired, that hysterical hack at the CDC and that other woman who broke her own rules. 

    • #86
  27. Dr.Guido Member
    Dr.Guido
    @DrGuido

    Rob’s Trump + Bleach was…awful. He owes Ricochet an apology.

    As to PC and schools. I went to a Jesuit Prep school and a Jesuit college. I was exposed to Dan Berrigan S.J. in and outside of the classroom in both places. I was also exposed to PhD’s who survived Bataan as well as professors who were BIG activists for Goldwater AND LBJ.

    Not a one of them imagined a scenario in which any one of them could be cancelled, or could cancel the opposite—IN FACT  we were the diversity that we craved–is craved today!— and celebrated!  

    What better defines the difference between 1960 vs 2021 America? What shows how much we have lost?

    • #87
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.