Everything Is Broken

We’re back after our 4th of July break (well, most of us are back — we have Ricochet Editor Bethany Mandel sitting in for the vacationing Peter Robinson) and we’ve got another super-sized episode to make up for our time off. First up, the always great Heather Mac Donald, who speaks truth to protestors like nobody else. Then, meet Shermichael Singleton, former political strategist, a former Deputy Chief of Staff at HUD, and a former member of the GOP. Shermichael tells us why he’s left the latter two organizations and it should be required listening at the RNC. Luckily for us, Shermichael is a current Ricochet podcaster and if you have not listened to the Speak-Easy podcast he co-hosts with Antonia Okafor, we highly recommend it. Also, a bit on the Harper’s free speech letter, the triumphant return of the Lileks Post of The Week, and Bethany has a new Twitter friend.

Music from this week’s show: Everything Is Broken by Bob Dylan

Subscribe to Ricochet Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Please Support Our Sponsors!

CarShield

Keeps

Laurel Springs School

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 323 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Taras Coolidge

    @dhmorgan — Did I accidentally hit on something? When I speculated that you might not be an American, it was because your rendition of American politics was, to exaggerate slightly, at the level of “and then the fairies crowned the candidate who was pure of heart”.

    But then you came back with a very curious response. “My parents were born in Kentucky and I was born in California where my father was stationed while in the Marines. Q.E.D.”

    While I accept that you are every bit as much a “natural born citizen” as Barack Obama, there’s nothing there to say where you went after you were born in California. For example, I have no difficulty saying that I’ve lived my entire life in New York and New Jersey.

    My senior Senator is Chuck Schumer, arguably the most loathsome elected official in the United States; my junior Senator is Kristen Gillibrand, a hypocrite and political hack but still an angel of light compared to Schumer. So you see my view of what it takes to get elected to the Senate may be a little more pessimistic than yours.

     I hope you’re right, that Mitt Romney’s treacherous grandstanding will not help deliver the Senate (and the Presidency) to the Democrats. Given how quickly politics moves these days, for all we know, four months from now the election may turn on Quemoy and Matsu.

    • #211
    • July 13, 2020, at 12:33 PM PDT
    • Like
  2. Annefy Member

    Taras (View Comment):

    Annefy (View Comment):

    Charlottesville ? Charlottesville? At this late date, people are still criticizing DT for Charlottesville?

    Anyone still making that claim made up their mind about DT and are now seeking evidence to bolster their feelings, truth be damned.

    I recently debated a favorite nephew and made a statement that was somewhat ambiguous. When I saw how I was misinterpreted I circled back and codified it

    Till the end of the conversation my nephew brought up my ambiguous statement over and over to bolster his own argument, truth be damned.

    My nephew is 20 and his immaturity is excused. No so with the guest. Unserious and a waste of time


    Here are the unambiguous actual words of President Trump:

    “Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”

    After another question at that press conference, Trump became even more explicit:

    “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.”

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html

    (I’m thinking of following @garyrobbins so that I can pop up every time he retells this false story and correct him. His counterargument might be that 1) Trump meant “very bad” in the ghetto sense of very good; or that 2) Trump used his time machine and jumped back in time to insert that first sentence, so it’s OK to ignore it.)

    (Once they have crossed out the first sentence, Robbins and the liberal media continue their reasoning as follows. 1. All opponents of tearing down statues of Robert E. Lee are white supremacists by definition. 2. White supremacist = neo-Nazi. 3. Disagreeing with #2 proves you’re a white supremacist.)

    I am frankly disgusted. Not only that someone continues to tell this lie, but that no one pushed back. (Unless I missed it. Bethany pushed back on the “white supremacist” tweet by comparing her grandparents to DT on all things Twitter. Fair enough, but it should have been pointed out that DT obviously didn’t listen to the audio. And that he deleted it. So he only wanted to sound like a white supremacist until someone noticed???) At which point I hit pause with no plans to return. Ever.

    I avoid talk of politics these days. But when I do find myself engaged, and someone lies, I feel duty bound to correct them. To bad our esteemed podcast team, who are employed to talk about politics, don’t feel similarly.

    • #212
    • July 13, 2020, at 2:50 PM PDT
    • 4 likes
  3. kedavis Member

    Annefy (View Comment):

    I am frankly disgusted. Not only that someone continues to tell this lie, but that no one pushed back. (Unless I missed it. Bethany pushed back on the “white supremacist” tweet by comparing her grandparents to DT on all things Twitter. Fair enough, but it should have been pointed out that DT obviously didn’t listen to the audio. And that he deleted it. So he only wanted to sound like a white supremacist until someone noticed???) At which point I hit pause with no plans to return. Ever.

    I avoid talk of politics these days. But when I do find myself engaged, and someone lies, I feel duty bound to correct them. To bad our esteemed podcast team, who are employed to talk about politics, don’t feel similarly.

    I seem to just automatically ignore things like that, since I already know the reality/truth. A lot of people still don’t, so I should probably be more insistent on making sure they get the message at every opportunity. Unfortunately there are some cases, such as my poor benighted mother, who would never believe – probably not even understand – the actual facts.

    • #213
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:01 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  4. RktSci Member

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    And a new podcaster in Mr. Singleton who told us, quite literally today in his podcast, that we need to “understand” black fear of the cops. Which Heather MacDonald explains is unfounded, in this podcast on the same day, with Mr. Singleton as the follow-up guest.

    I’m getting whiplash here.

    BLM delenda est.

    A point: Heather MacDonald completely ducked or misunderstood the followup she was given about police violence towards black citizens. She went back to the data on shootings, which have been found to be race-neutral. As a previous guest on the podcast, Dr. Roland Fryer of Harvard, has found, the police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people.

    That’s the real problem that we have with policing in the US.

    The everyday drip, drip, drip of indignities and unjustified force being used on black citizens has lead to current distrust and resentment of policing. If you have been hassled and mistreated by the police, it’s not an unreasonable leap to think that they might shoot you. It needs to be fixed.

    • #214
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:04 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  5. kedavis Member

    RktSci (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    And a new podcaster in Mr. Singleton who told us, quite literally today in his podcast, that we need to “understand” black fear of the cops. Which Heather MacDonald explains is unfounded, in this podcast on the same day, with Mr. Singleton as the follow-up guest.

    I’m getting whiplash here.

    BLM delenda est.

    A point: Heather MacDonald completely ducked or misunderstood the followup she was given about police violence towards black citizens. She went back to the data on shootings, which have been found to be race-neutral. As a previous guest on the podcast, Dr. Roland Fryer of Harvard, has found, the police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people.

    That’s the real problem that we have with policing in the US.

    The everyday drip, drip, drip of indignities and unjustified force being used on black citizens has lead to current distrust and resentment of policing. If you have been hassled and mistreated by the police, it’s not an unreasonable leap to think that they might shoot you. It needs to be fixed.

    Except that the same factors applied to shootings, would also apply to other non-shooting incidents. The ones where someone gets shot, are just the ones that escalated to that point. But the same “Share of violent crime” factors would still apply, because they mean that any random black citizen a cop happens to encounter is far more likely to be a (violent or non-violent) criminal than any random white person a cop happens to encounter.

    • #215
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:10 PM PDT
    • Like
  6. Annefy Member

    RktSci (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    And a new podcaster in Mr. Singleton who told us, quite literally today in his podcast, that we need to “understand” black fear of the cops. Which Heather MacDonald explains is unfounded, in this podcast on the same day, with Mr. Singleton as the follow-up guest.

    I’m getting whiplash here.

    BLM delenda est.

    A point: Heather MacDonald completely ducked or misunderstood the followup she was given about police violence towards black citizens. She went back to the data on shootings, which have been found to be race-neutral. As a previous guest on the podcast, Dr. Roland Fryer of Harvard, has found, the police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people.

    That’s the real problem that we have with policing in the US.

    The everyday drip, drip, drip of indignities and unjustified force being used on black citizens has lead to current distrust and resentment of policing. If you have been hassled and mistreated by the police, it’s not an unreasonable leap to think that they might shoot you. It needs to be fixed.

    I found the Sam Harris podcast (can we pull back from the brink) to be very helpful in trying to understand what is going on. I think he’s correct; we have populations all suffering from PTSD caused by different things. Many Blacks are convinced that the police are harassing them and “hunting them down”; cops feel threatened.

    Additionally, there seems to be a lack of understanding by some being stopped by the police that the presence of a gun changes the interaction, and it’s incumbent on everyone to understand that. I keep reading about the “talk” that Blacks have to give their sons; is that the same “talk” I gave my three white sons (and should have given my white daughter)?

    While many Black people might feel harassed, I have two comments. 1) many are suffering PTSD from experiences that are not their own. They’ve been told over and over that they’re under threat. 2) thanks to over criminalization, people in some neighborhoods are forced to interact with the police way too much. (I’m thinking Eric Garner) and I’m sure at some point you’re going to feel defensive and bitter.

    Anyway, I am no huge fan of Sam Harris, but I considered this podcast helpful and time well spent.

    https://samharris.org/podcasts/207-can-pull-back-brink/

     

    • #216
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:20 PM PDT
    • 3 likes
  7. RufusRJones Member

    HEY GARY MEET ANGELA lol 

     

     

    You have to hear this.

    • #217
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:21 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  8. RufusRJones Member

    Blacks get the shaft in Minnesota. The Democrat party creates systemic racism. I’m dead serious. They just did a confession session at the University of Minnesota. Definitely watch this.

     

     

    There is a one hour discussion on YouTube.

    • #218
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:24 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  9. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher

    Annefy (View Comment):
    I avoid talk of politics these days. But when I do find myself engaged, and someone lies, I feel duty bound to correct them. To bad our esteemed podcast team, who are employed to talk about politics, don’t feel similarly.

    I wondered the same thing. The Charlottesville misinformation campaign was so frustrating for those of us who were paying attention. Sometimes I wonder if Trump supporters are waging an uphill battle as we hear people in own party only repeat the soundbites from CNN, etc. When I watch the nightly network news, I find myself saying over and over — but that’s not what he said! To have it repeated here without any correction by people who should know better is concerning.

    Apparently Shermichael traces the moment he left the party to soundbites that left out the most conciliatory part of the speech. I’ve noticed many who find serious fault with Trump’s reelection within the party are prone to repeating things he said some four years ago during the campaign and which are either no longer relevant or have since been corrected with more nuanced language. They didn’t support him from day one.

    Well, if Shermichael is seeking his 15 minutes of fame, he’s on the right track as the media is delighted to give publicity to Republicans on the Never side. In case there’s any doubt, Erick Erickson just said on his podcast that he had lots of invitations from the political shows when he was against Trump, but the phone stopped ringing when he announced he was a supporter. The hard left is coming for us, and the only person standing in the way is Trump. Lord help us.

    • #219
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:50 PM PDT
    • 6 likes
  10. kedavis Member

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Annefy (View Comment):
    I avoid talk of politics these days. But when I do find myself engaged, and someone lies, I feel duty bound to correct them. To bad our esteemed podcast team, who are employed to talk about politics, don’t feel similarly.

    I wondered the same thing. The Charlottesville misinformation campaign was so frustrating for those of us who were paying attention. Sometimes I wonder if Trump supporters are waging an uphill battle as we hear people in own party only repeat the soundbites from CNN, etc. When I watch the nightly network news, I find myself saying over and over — but that’s not what he said! To have it repeated here without any correction by people who should know better is concerning.

    Apparently Shermichael traces the moment he left the party to soundbites that left out the most conciliatory part of the speech. I’ve noticed many who find serious fault with Trump’s reelection within the party are prone to repeating things he said some four years ago during the campaign and which are either no longer relevant or have since been corrected with more nuanced language. They didn’t support him from day one.

    Well, if Shermichael is seeking his 15 minutes of fame, he’s on the right track as the media is delighted to give publicity to Republicans on the Never side. In case there’s any doubt, Erick Erickson just said on his podcast that he had lots of invitations from the political shows when he was against Trump, but the phone stopped ringing when he announced he was a supporter. The hard left is coming for us, and the only person standing in the way is Trump. Lord help us.

    Some people still think Sarah Palin said “I can see Russia from my house!”

    • #220
    • July 13, 2020, at 3:58 PM PDT
    • 5 likes
  11. RufusRJones Member

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Some people still think Sarah Palin said “I can see Russia from my house!”

    I can vouch for this. 

    • #221
    • July 13, 2020, at 4:12 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  12. Taras Coolidge

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RktSci (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    And a new podcaster in Mr. Singleton who told us, quite literally today in his podcast, that we need to “understand” black fear of the cops. Which Heather MacDonald explains is unfounded, in this podcast on the same day, with Mr. Singleton as the follow-up guest.

    I’m getting whiplash here.

    BLM delenda est.

    A point: Heather MacDonald completely ducked or misunderstood the followup she was given about police violence towards black citizens. She went back to the data on shootings, which have been found to be race-neutral. As a previous guest on the podcast, Dr. Roland Fryer of Harvard, has found, the police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people.

    That’s the real problem that we have with policing in the US.

    The everyday drip, drip, drip of indignities and unjustified force being used on black citizens has lead to current distrust and resentment of policing. If you have been hassled and mistreated by the police, it’s not an unreasonable leap to think that they might shoot you. It needs to be fixed.

    Except that the same factors applied to shootings, would also apply to other non-shooting incidents. The ones where someone gets shot, are just the ones that escalated to that point. But the same “Share of violent crime” factors would still apply, because they mean that any random black citizen a cop happens to encounter is far more likely to be a (violent or non-violent) criminal than any random white person a cop happens to encounter.

    @rktsci — “police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people”.

    Statistically speaking, do black people behave the same as white people when they are arrested? I suspect not. Are black suspects larger and stronger than white suspects, on average? Almost certainly. More likely to resist violently? Probably.

    Do white cops use more force against black suspects than black cops do? Probably the reverse.

    • #222
    • July 13, 2020, at 4:22 PM PDT
    • 3 likes
  13. Annefy Member

    Taras (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RktSci (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    And a new podcaster in Mr. Singleton who told us, quite literally today in his podcast, that we need to “understand” black fear of the cops. Which Heather MacDonald explains is unfounded, in this podcast on the same day, with Mr. Singleton as the follow-up guest.

    I’m getting whiplash here.

    BLM delenda est.

    A point: Heather MacDonald completely ducked or misunderstood the followup she was given about police violence towards black citizens. She went back to the data on shootings, which have been found to be race-neutral. As a previous guest on the podcast, Dr. Roland Fryer of Harvard, has found, the police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people.

    That’s the real problem that we have with policing in the US.

    The everyday drip, drip, drip of indignities and unjustified force being used on black citizens has lead to current distrust and resentment of policing. If you have been hassled and mistreated by the police, it’s not an unreasonable leap to think that they might shoot you. It needs to be fixed.

    Except that the same factors applied to shootings, would also apply to other non-shooting incidents. The ones where someone gets shot, are just the ones that escalated to that point. But the same “Share of violent crime” factors would still apply, because they mean that any random black citizen a cop happens to encounter is far more likely to be a (violent or non-violent) criminal than any random white person a cop happens to encounter.

    @rktsci — “police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people”.

    Statistically speaking, do black people behave the same as white people when they are arrested? I suspect not. Are black suspects larger and stronger than white suspects, on average? Almost certainly. More likely to resist violently? Probably.

    Do white cops use more force against black suspects than black cops do? Probably the reverse.

    The race of the cop is a data point that is often missing. I keep telling people that if you’re ready to talk about abuse of power at all levels, I’m all ears. But to continuously focus on “racism” is not only missing the point, it’s counter productive. Much better for the powers that we keep yelling “racist” to each other and are too distracted to focus on our real problems.

    • #223
    • July 13, 2020, at 4:38 PM PDT
    • 7 likes
  14. kedavis Member

    Taras (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RktSci (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    And a new podcaster in Mr. Singleton who told us, quite literally today in his podcast, that we need to “understand” black fear of the cops. Which Heather MacDonald explains is unfounded, in this podcast on the same day, with Mr. Singleton as the follow-up guest.

    I’m getting whiplash here.

    BLM delenda est.

    A point: Heather MacDonald completely ducked or misunderstood the followup she was given about police violence towards black citizens. She went back to the data on shootings, which have been found to be race-neutral. As a previous guest on the podcast, Dr. Roland Fryer of Harvard, has found, the police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people.

    That’s the real problem that we have with policing in the US.

    The everyday drip, drip, drip of indignities and unjustified force being used on black citizens has lead to current distrust and resentment of policing. If you have been hassled and mistreated by the police, it’s not an unreasonable leap to think that they might shoot you. It needs to be fixed.

    Except that the same factors applied to shootings, would also apply to other non-shooting incidents. The ones where someone gets shot, are just the ones that escalated to that point. But the same “Share of violent crime” factors would still apply, because they mean that any random black citizen a cop happens to encounter is far more likely to be a (violent or non-violent) criminal than any random white person a cop happens to encounter.

    @rktsci — “police are much, much more likely to use physical force on black people than white people”.

    Statistically speaking, do black people behave the same as white people when they are arrested? I suspect not. Are black suspects larger and stronger than white suspects, on average? Almost certainly. More likely to resist violently? Probably.

    Do white cops use more force against black suspects than black cops do? Probably the reverse.

    Yes. And more. But just for one example, people need to remember that “unarmed black teenager” Michael Brown was an 18-year-old, 6′ 4″ tall, 292 lb, adult man trying to grab a cop’s gun.

    • #224
    • July 13, 2020, at 5:27 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  15. EHerring Coolidge

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Socialism it is. @garyrobbins

    That’s a mild version (socialism). The choice in 2016 was Trump or crooked Hillary. In 2020 the choice is Trump or BLM/Antifa. Seems clear to me.

    Or there is a third way, conservatism without Trump who is a RINO, or Republican in Name Only.

    No, there is no third choice, now or ever. In 2024, you will have two choices. Find a conservative who fights the left, not joins them.

    • #225
    • July 13, 2020, at 7:24 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  16. EHerring Coolidge

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Socialism it is. @garyrobbins

    That’s a mild version (socialism). The choice in 2016 was Trump or crooked Hillary. In 2020 the choice is Trump or BLM/Antifa. Seems clear to me.

    Or there is a third way, conservatism without Trump who is a RINO, or Republican in Name Only.

    Game that out for me. tia

    Trump loses big. We lose the Senate. We continue to be routed in the House and in the states. After going through the Stages of Loss, Denial, Bargaining, Anger, Depression, we come to Acceptance. Then we will remember that there was a time when we could be proud of Republican Presidents and did not need to cringe when they spoke: Reagan, yes, but also Bush, Ford, Ike, Coolidge. and also our nominees, Romney, McCain, and Dole. And then we realize that the problem was not the conservative message, it was the terribly flawed messenger, Trump, Q-Anon and his band of misfits. After we throw Trump, Q-Anon and his band of misfits on the ash heap of history, we ask the American People to trust the Party of Reagan again.

    I will blame the Never Trumpers.

    • #226
    • July 13, 2020, at 7:26 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  17. EHerring Coolidge

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Socialism it is. @garyrobbins

    That’s a mild version (socialism). The choice in 2016 was Trump or crooked Hillary. In 2020 the choice is Trump or BLM/Antifa. Seems clear to me.

    Or there is a third way, conservatism without Trump who is a RINO, or Republican in Name Only.

    Not on the ballot in 2020.

    Correct. Since the Dems nominated a relatively sane person, Biden, instead of Sanders, Biden has my vote in 2020.

    If you keep up with the news, he’s going to be controlled by the far left.

    Republicans like Gary are why we lose ground in the culture and political battlefields every year.

    • #227
    • July 13, 2020, at 7:27 PM PDT
    • 5 likes
  18. EHerring Coolidge

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    A new point. This morning, Trump was tweeting attacking Pat Toomey as well as Romney. Trump demands total fealty, but he shows no loyalty to the Republican Party.

    Neither will I, if they support Biden.

    • #228
    • July 13, 2020, at 7:29 PM PDT
    • 3 likes
  19. RufusRJones Member

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Socialism it is. @garyrobbins

    That’s a mild version (socialism). The choice in 2016 was Trump or crooked Hillary. In 2020 the choice is Trump or BLM/Antifa. Seems clear to me.

    Or there is a third way, conservatism without Trump who is a RINO, or Republican in Name Only.

    Then why are you enthused about John McCain?

    The whole who is a RINO and given what has happened to this country since 1988 makes one ask a lot of questions. I just don’t see the right being that good at making things go right. That’s how you got Trump.

    • #229
    • July 14, 2020, at 1:21 AM PDT
    • 2 likes
  20. RufusRJones Member

    Mark Levin was talking about how risky this next election was with Thomas Sowell. His opinion is the country is finished if the Democrat party takes all three branches. I think that’s obviously true because we didn’t wipe out the ACA. I don’t know if there are any clips from the show or if it’s still available. It was on Sunday. 

    I really think after the tea party was defeated effectively, you can’t look at politics and government in a standard away like Gary does. It took me a long time to come around to that.

    I highly recommend the latest American Greatness podcast if you can get it in.

    • #230
    • July 14, 2020, at 1:30 AM PDT
    • 2 likes
  21. kedavis Member

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Mark Levin was talking about how risky this next election was with Thomas Sowell. His opinion is the country is finished if the Democrat party takes all three branches. I think that’s obviously true because we didn’t wipe out the ACA. I don’t know if there are any clips from the show or if it’s still available. It was on Sunday.

    I really think after the tea party was defeated effectively, you can’t look at politics and government in a standard away like Gary does. It took me a long time to come around to that.

    I highly recommend the latest American Greatness podcast if you can get it in.

    What show does Levin do on Sundays? His regular show, and the associated podcast, runs Mon-Fri.

    • #231
    • July 14, 2020, at 1:32 AM PDT
    • Like
  22. RufusRJones Member

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Mark Levin was talking about how risky this next election was with Thomas Sowell. His opinion is the country is finished if the Democrat party takes all three branches. I think that’s obviously true because we didn’t wipe out the ACA. I don’t know if there are any clips from the show or if it’s still available. It was on Sunday.

    I really think after the tea party was defeated effectively, you can’t look at politics and government in a standard away like Gary does. It took me a long time to come around to that.

    I highly recommend the latest American Greatness podcast if you can get it in.

    What show does Levin do on Sundays? His regular show, and the associated podcast, runs Mon-Fri.

    He has a show on Fox news every Sunday.

    • #232
    • July 14, 2020, at 1:33 AM PDT
    • Like
  23. kedavis Member

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Mark Levin was talking about how risky this next election was with Thomas Sowell. His opinion is the country is finished if the Democrat party takes all three branches. I think that’s obviously true because we didn’t wipe out the ACA. I don’t know if there are any clips from the show or if it’s still available. It was on Sunday.

    I really think after the tea party was defeated effectively, you can’t look at politics and government in a standard away like Gary does. It took me a long time to come around to that.

    I highly recommend the latest American Greatness podcast if you can get it in.

    What show does Levin do on Sundays? His regular show, and the associated podcast, runs Mon-Fri.

    He has a show on Fox news every Sunday.

    Oh, I don’t get Fox News. But I’ll look for a podcast, probably audio-only.

    • #233
    • July 14, 2020, at 1:55 AM PDT
    • Like
  24. RufusRJones Member

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Mark Levin was talking about how risky this next election was with Thomas Sowell. His opinion is the country is finished if the Democrat party takes all three branches. I think that’s obviously true because we didn’t wipe out the ACA. I don’t know if there are any clips from the show or if it’s still available. It was on Sunday.

    I really think after the tea party was defeated effectively, you can’t look at politics and government in a standard away like Gary does. It took me a long time to come around to that.

    I highly recommend the latest American Greatness podcast if you can get it in.

    What show does Levin do on Sundays? His regular show, and the associated podcast, runs Mon-Fri.

    He has a show on Fox news every Sunday.

    Oh, I don’t get Fox News. But I’ll look for a podcast, probably audio-only.

    I think he had clips on his radio show last night.

    • #234
    • July 14, 2020, at 2:24 AM PDT
    • Like
  25. EHerring Coolidge

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Mark Levin was talking about how risky this next election was with Thomas Sowell. His opinion is the country is finished if the Democrat party takes all three branches. I think that’s obviously true because we didn’t wipe out the ACA. I don’t know if there are any clips from the show or if it’s still available. It was on Sunday.

    I really think after the tea party was defeated effectively, you can’t look at politics and government in a standard away like Gary does. It took me a long time to come around to that.

    I highly recommend the latest American Greatness podcast if you can get it in.

    Sowell mentions the same thing on the ricochet podcast.

    • #235
    • July 14, 2020, at 4:42 AM PDT
    • 2 likes
  26. EHerring Coolidge

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Mark Levin was talking about how risky this next election was with Thomas Sowell. His opinion is the country is finished if the Democrat party takes all three branches. I think that’s obviously true because we didn’t wipe out the ACA. I don’t know if there are any clips from the show or if it’s still available. It was on Sunday.

    I really think after the tea party was defeated effectively, you can’t look at politics and government in a standard away like Gary does. It took me a long time to come around to that.

    I highly recommend the latest American Greatness podcast if you can get it in.

    What show does Levin do on Sundays? His regular show, and the associated podcast, runs Mon-Fri.

    He has a show on Fox news every Sunday.

    Oh, I don’t get Fox News. But I’ll look for a podcast, probably audio-only.

    His radio show is free, live stream and once over, posted as a free podcast.

    • #236
    • July 14, 2020, at 4:44 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  27. EHerring Coolidge

    Re the comments on Levin and Sowell, has anyone noticed that Levin has moved passed Convention of the States to this election as the last chance? I was wondering how long it would take for him to realize the new Neros fiddling while the country burns are the Republican and old school Democrat voters. I realized it was too late for an Article 5 convention when Mueller and Schiff were engaged in their coup.

    • #237
    • July 14, 2020, at 4:50 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  28. RufusRJones Member

    Why shouldn’t I be very upset about this? This seems extremely stupid.

     

     

     

     

     

    • #238
    • July 14, 2020, at 5:21 AM PDT
    • Like
  29. RufusRJones Member

    Be sure to donate to the Lincoln Project.

     

     

    In a June 15th interview with Russia Today, an outlet funded by the Russian government, Davis said, “I don’t see this election as being about choosing a candidate who will be able to lead us in the right direction. It will be about choosing a candidate who can be most effectively pressured into allowing more space for the evolving anti-racist movement.”

     

    She continued, “Biden is far more likely to take mass demands seriously,” than President Trump.

     

    In 1979, Davis was awarded the Lenin Peace Prize, where she praised “the glorious name” of mass murderer Vladimir Lenin and the “great October Revolution”. 

     

    Despite her reproachable past, Davis was honored by the annual Washington DC Women’s March and received a civil rights award from the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute. Her voice is respected and admired by progressives.

    • #239
    • July 14, 2020, at 8:23 AM PDT
    • 2 likes
  30. RufusRJones Member

    delete

    • #240
    • July 14, 2020, at 9:43 AM PDT
    • Like
    • This comment has been edited.