Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
The Popular vote compact should be discarded because its unconstitutional, it disenfranchises the population of the state. Could you imagine how angry a state would be, if they voted for one party – and another party won the popular vote? IF you were to reform the electoral college I think the best reform possible, would be to grant electoral votes based on congressional district. Contrary to what was said in the podcast – I think the media establishment would find this very valuable. Using the example of California, with its 55 electoral votes, is the most valuable state in the union – but because its practically a single party dictatorship, it gets very little campaign spending. If they granted their electoral votes by congressional district – and republicans think they can get 10 – 15 of them, wouldnt they spend money in California? Even if they dont win the state, California would be just as valuable to them as Ohio or Michigan. Democrats would feel the same way about Texas, they’re unlikely to win the state – but if they campaigned there – they could steal a dozen electoral votes from the republicans.
The media should be all for this – as it turns all the larger states into battleground states, meaning that local affiliates and media get more campaign spending.
“The best reform possible, would be to grant electoral votes based on congressional district.”
Danger, danger, Will Robinson! This would mean that, for the first time, not just the House but Presidential elections would be subject to gerrymandering.
Yes, that’s a good point.
The 1960 Presidential election in Alabama:
Probably the fairest way to allocate the votes … is to add up the ballots cast for the 11 Democratic electors, and then allocate six elevenths of the total to Byrd and five elevenths to Kennedy. This reflects the reality of the state’s Democratic Party: It was split between national party loyalists and Dixiecrats.
Adopting this approach results in a Nixon victory of around 60,000 votes, which is how Congressional Quarterly originally calculated the results.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/10/19/did_jfk_lose_the_popular_vote_115833-2.html
Sean Connery Welsh?! Born in Edinburgh, supported the Scottish National Party.
I heard that and couldn’t believe it. The only thing I could think was that Steve was thinking of Timothy Dalton who was indeed Welsh.
Great insights into the Electoral College. I hope to remember some of these if I ever get into a discussion with someone. And yeah – nobody apparently knows no nothing about no history these days.