Kevin and Charlie discuss the recent college admission scandal and Gavin Newsom’s stance on the death penalty.

You can access the full archive of Mad Dogs and Englishmen at NationalReview.com/podcasts, where you can listen to four episodes per month for free, or get the entire back catalogue with an NR Plus membership. Visit NationalReview.com/subscribe for details.

Subscribe to Mad Dogs and Englishmen in iTunes (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in iTunes or by RSS feed.

There are 2 comments.

  1. Member

    If you know for a fact that someone has brutally killed someone with malice aforethought (as, for one example, that horrid young woman from South Carolina who drowned her two infant sons and blamed it on a roving “black guy”), to not execute that person when the death penalty is in place is a judicial form of cheap grace. It says victims don’t matter as much as killers. Not that they fare that well either, penned up year after year after year after year. That can’t be particularly moral. And what about those murderers who do truly repent? I suspect they mostly make peace with death. And I certainly do not wish for them to suffer.

     

    • #1
    • March 14, 2019 at 8:36 pm
    • Like
  2. Member

    What difference does it make that a death row inmate is not currently posing a threat? This is a legal punishment for the barbarity of his crimes. Life is not being cheapened. The killer already cheapened it. The whole point is we no longer value their lives, since they didn’t value those of their victims. 

    The intruder comparison isn’t fitting. If you tie up an intruder the reason you don’t then get to decide to kill him is because you are denying them legal process, which the death sentence is imposed through. 

    • #2
    • March 14, 2019 at 11:39 pm
    • Like