Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
It’s a lively session in the faculty lounge as Professors Richard Epstein and John Yoo navigate a minefield of legal controversies: what do Alabama’s new restrictions on abortion mean for the future of Roe v. Wade? What’s the proper libertarian position on compulsory vaccinations? Does Congress have a leg to stand on in its pursuit of Bill Barr? Was Harvard wrong to turn its back on a professor who’s defending Harvey Weinstein? And then, the professors finally answer the question you’ve waited years for: are bans on toplessness unconstitutional? We guarantee you’ll leave disturbed.
Subscribe to Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Senik in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.
Lending Club
With LendingClub you can consolidate your debt or pay off credit cards with ONE fixed monthly payment. Check your rate in minutes and borrow up to $40,000 at lendingclub.com/ricochet.
I’m already disturbed by the cover art.
“Art”? I think you mean to say “unretouched photograph.”
I don’t know @troysenik, don’t we need to see Epstein and Yoo to compare? Oh ok that just might cause a stampede to the exits.
That’s Anthony Weiner’s body, by the way.
Excellent conversation.
I looked up the Gresham’s law reference by Troy. Very true!
Ok, you guys are in a tie for first-place with the Problematic Women podcast today for most eye-catching headline.
Nice pic there, @ejhill and @troysenik!
I’ll have you know that this
cover artunretouched photograph was instrumental in getting me to listen to this excellent podcast.No, no, and no. Just no.
Just trying to get you all to google “Anthony Weiner naked.”
So, just curious. If there is no limit on expanding the supreme court membership, what is the prohibition on reducing the size? Does a position have to be filled?
What is the prohibition against not filling a supreme court vacancy? If a president can add seats, can another president not fill seats or eliminate seats.