Free The Nipple

It’s a lively session in the faculty lounge as Professors Richard Epstein and John Yoo navigate a minefield of legal controversies: what do Alabama’s new restrictions on abortion mean for the future of Roe v. Wade? What’s the proper libertarian position on compulsory vaccinations? Does Congress have a leg to stand on in its pursuit of Bill Barr? Was Harvard wrong to turn its back on a professor who’s defending Harvey Weinstein? And then, the professors finally answer the question you’ve waited years for: are bans on toplessness unconstitutional? We guarantee you’ll leave disturbed.

Subscribe to Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Senik in iTunes (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in iTunes or by RSS feed.

Please Support Our Sponsor!

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 14 comments.

  1. Miffed White Male Member

    Ricochet Audio Network: We guarantee you’ll leave disturbed.

    I’m already disturbed by the cover art.

     

    • #1
    • May 16, 2019, at 9:18 AM PDT
    • 7 likes
  2. Troy Senik Contributor

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Ricochet Audio Network: We guarantee you’ll leave disturbed.

    I’m already disturbed by the cover art.

     

    “Art”? I think you mean to say “unretouched photograph.”

    • #2
    • May 16, 2019, at 9:34 AM PDT
    • 5 likes
  3. colleenb Member

    I don’t know @troysenik, don’t we need to see Epstein and Yoo to compare? Oh ok that just might cause a stampede to the exits.

    • #3
    • May 16, 2019, at 9:45 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  4. Max Ledoux Admin

    That’s Anthony Weiner’s body, by the way.

    • #4
    • May 16, 2019, at 10:37 AM PDT
    • 3 likes
  5. colleenb Member

    Excellent conversation.

    • #5
    • May 16, 2019, at 11:25 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  6. Troy Senik Contributor

    Max Ledoux (View Comment):

    That’s Anthony Weiner’s body, by the way.

    1. Ewwwww!
    2. Why do you know that?
    3. Why were you so anxious to admit that you know that?
    • #6
    • May 16, 2019, at 12:11 PM PDT
    • 7 likes
  7. Texmoor Coolidge

    I looked up the Gresham’s law reference by Troy. Very true!

    • #7
    • May 16, 2019, at 12:18 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  8. EtCarter Listener

    Ok, you guys are in a tie for first-place with the Problematic Women podcast today for most eye-catching headline. 

    • #8
    • May 16, 2019, at 12:49 PM PDT
    • Like
  9. Blondie Thatcher

    Nice pic there, @ejhill and @troysenik

    • #9
    • May 16, 2019, at 1:00 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  10. CatherineMontalbo Coolidge

    I’ll have you know that this cover art unretouched photograph was instrumental in getting me to listen to this excellent podcast.

    • #10
    • May 16, 2019, at 2:10 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  11. Mendel Member

    No, no, and no. Just no.

    • #11
    • May 17, 2019, at 3:46 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  12. Max Ledoux Admin

    Troy Senik (View Comment):

    Max Ledoux (View Comment):

    That’s Anthony Weiner’s body, by the way.

    1. Ewwwww!
    2. Why do you know that?
    3. Why were you so anxious to admit that you know that?

    Just trying to get you all to google “Anthony Weiner naked.”

    • #12
    • May 17, 2019, at 9:12 AM PDT
    • Like
  13. Steve Tom Romley Coolidge

    So, just curious. If there is no limit on expanding the supreme court membership, what is the prohibition on reducing the size? Does a position have to be filled?

    • #13
    • June 14, 2019, at 12:14 PM PDT
    • Like
  14. Steve Tom Romley Coolidge

    What is the prohibition against not filling a supreme court vacancy? If a president can add seats, can another president not fill seats or eliminate seats.

    • #14
    • June 14, 2019, at 12:18 PM PDT
    • Like