Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.






While I am not ready to say that Stephen Miller is wrong in his contention that it is the job of the Press Secretary to lie, I think the statement is over the top, and that is up to him to back it up. It is easy to talk about Obama’s Press Secretary as having lied. What is the exact lie that Dana Perino told? If he can’t offer a specific example, I’d suggest that he stop attacking people like Dana (and Tony Snow, for that matter), who may “spin” something (we all do that). I believe people like Dana and Tony try their best, and to use the word “Lie” is to defame very good people.
@ George Townsend:
A spin,,,, or a lie? I think that is a distinction without a difference. Miller is just voicing what a lot of us out here in flyover country see, hear and absolutely detest. He also made it very clear that he was not attacking the people that have been WH Press Secs., just the position.
I’m sorry, I do not take back my umbrage at Miller’s comments:
You and Miller are just wrong. Whether you are in “flyover” country or not.
It doesn’t take much in Trump space to overshadow any good that’s getting done. It’s going to be this way for the rest of the ride. Good economy? So what? Trump banged porn stars.
I was a bit surprised to hear the rationalization for “what-aboutism”, though – because I’m pretty sure I’ve heard the contrary argument on this podcast before. I think it’s perfectly fine to say “what about” when pointing out hypocrisy; in previous pods that approach was sort of brushed aside as what-aboutism, and not a great argument.
Good pod this week. Thanks guys.
C