This week, the Court was the scene of several crimes, or rather, several oral arguments about crimes. Your hosts discuss the fascinating issues of double-jeopardy, criminal speech, and out-of-court confessions that those arguments raised. GianCarlo then interviews Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick about his career and his work developing a body law governing state-constitutional interpretation. Trivia continues the criminal law theme focusing on interesting facts about the Court’s criminal law cases.

 

Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.

 

Don’t forget to leave a 5-star rating.

 

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

 


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Subscribe to Case in Point in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

There is 1 comment.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Steve Fast Member
    Steve Fast
    @SteveFast

    I enjoyed the interview with a state supreme court justice and especially his view that state constitutional provisions should be interpreted originally, i.e. based on jurisprudence at the time they were adopted and not based on subsequent federal constitutional jurisprudence.

    • #1
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.