There are 3 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Dr.Guido Member
    Dr.Guido
    @DrGuido

    Is Mr. Mounce saying that Genesis is to be taken literally. e.g. A ‘marriage’ actually took place between the sibling offspring of an Adam and Eve? (Did the bride wear white…?)

    I assume it’s obvious where I’m going with this. I’m not being facetious nor disrespectful.

    • #1
  2. Brian Scarborough Coolidge
    Brian Scarborough
    @Teeger

    Dr.Guido (View Comment):

    Is Mr. Mounce saying that Genesis is to be taken literally. e.g. A ‘marriage’ actually took place between the sibling offspring of an Adam and Eve? (Did the bride wear white…?)

    I assume it’s obvious where I’m going with this. I’m not being facetious nor disrespectful.

    But you are being smart-alecky. You use the word ‘literally’ as if it’s a strange way to interpret historical narrative. 

    Yes, the offspring of Adam and Eve would have married each other. It is one thing to say that you do not take Genesis 1-11, let’s say, literally, but let’s not act as if it is entirely implausible. 

    • #2
  3. FredGoodhue Coolidge
    FredGoodhue
    @FredGoodhue

    Brian Scarborough (View Comment):

    Dr.Guido (View Comment):

    Is Mr. Mounce saying that Genesis is to be taken literally. e.g. A ‘marriage’ actually took place between the sibling offspring of an Adam and Eve? (Did the bride wear white…?)

    I assume it’s obvious where I’m going with this. I’m not being facetious nor disrespectful.

    But you are being smart-alecky. You use the word ‘literally’ as if it’s a strange way to interpret historical narrative.

    Yes, the offspring of Adam and Eve would have married each other. It is one thing to say that you do not take Genesis 1-11, let’s say, literally, but let’s not act as if it is entirely implausible.

    Of course parts of Genesis 1-11 are entirely implausible.

    • #3
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.