There are 2 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RebeccaCoffey Thatcher
    RebeccaCoffey
    @RebeccaCoffey

    Fascinating.

    • #1
  2. Wolfsheim Member
    Wolfsheim
    @Wolfsheim

    I can understand “transgender rights,” if by what is meant by that is the right of a man who believes himself to be a woman not to be mistreated for his delusion–any more than someone who believes himself to be Dwight D. Eisenhower or a poached egg. The question–and here I confess that I stopped listening to the podcast–is whether we as a society allow ourselves to be browbeaten into accepting the delusion as reality–something Dr. Saad clearly opposes.

    In (selectively) rejecting reason, post-modernism does not become a pseudo-religion; it merely becomes just another irrational ideology. Furthermore, while radical subjectivism certainly bolsters the profoundly anti-scientific idea of transgenderism, it is not the only explanatory factor. Revolutionary movements must constantly grow ever more ferocious and ruthless; otherwise, they fizzle out, with an inevitable reaction and some sort of return to sanity. The astounding triumph of the homosexual cause was threatened by a sense of letdown, and so along came even wilder assertions with which to badger the bourgeoisie. 

    Jews and Christians do not deny biological reality; they affirm it:

    ברא אתו זכר ונקבה ברא אתם

    Male and female He made them. (Genesis 1:27)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • #2
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.