42 U.S. Code § 1983 is one of our nation’s most important civil rights statutes and it offers plaintiffs a way to seek damages against state officials in federal courts. But in Pierson v. Ray, the Supreme Court created a defense under Section 1983 for public officials, called qualified immunity, even if they do in fact violate people’s rights. In dissent, Justice Douglas called the doctrine “a more sophisticated manner of saying ‘The King can do no wrong.’” He was talking about immunity for judges, but his dissent was prescient when it comes to how qualified immunity prevents us from holding police officers accountable today.

 

In this episode, the ladies take listeners through the long, twisted journey of qualified immunity. Over the years it would turn out Justice Douglas was right…. just about the wrong thing.

 

Special thanks to guests Joanna Schwartz and Clark Neily.

 

Follow us on Twitter: @Anastasia_Esq @EHSlattery @PacificLegal

 

Send comments, questions, or ideas for future episodes to Dissed@pacificlegal.org

 


See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Subscribe to Dissed in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

There is 1 comment.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RebeccaCoffey Thatcher
    RebeccaCoffey
    @RebeccaCoffey

    Thank you for laying this subject out so clearly! It answered a lot of questions. 

    • #1