Does a video show someone burning ballots with votes for Trump? No. Did Michigan ‘magically’ find 138,339 votes for Joe Biden? Nope. What about Wisconsin? Did voter turnout exceed the number of registered voters in the state? A thousand times no. But tight vote counts in battleground states have laid the perfect groundwork for election disinformation to explode online over the past few days. As Steve points out, some bad actors on social media and cable news simply “don’t care whether what they’re saying is actually true.” But not to worry, Dispatch fact checkers Alec Dent and Khaya Himmelman—along with staff writer Andrew Egger—join the podcast today to debunk conspiracy theories surrounding election fraud so you don’t have to.

Show Notes:

-Join The Dispatch for a post-election gathering featuring congressional leadership and top policy experts November 9-10: Sign up here!

Click here for all of our latest fact checks.

-“Biden Had No Election Coattails,” by Karl Rove.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Subscribe to The Dispatch Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

There are 6 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Coolidge

    Ricochet Audio Network: But not to worry, Dispatch fact checkers Alec Dent and Khaya Himmelman—along with staff writer Andrew Egger—join the podcast today to debunk conspiracy theories surrounding election fraud so you don’t have to.

    Oh. Dispatch Fact-Checkers.

    Trustworthy lot.

    • #1
    • November 11, 2020, at 11:27 AM PST
    • 3 likes
  2. Bishop Wash Member

    Does this episode need the Jack treatment?

    • #2
    • November 11, 2020, at 11:44 AM PST
    • 3 likes
  3. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Coolidge

    And for the uncurious . . . (that would be you folks at The Dispatch) . . . here is a very long and well-compiled list.

    Please put your useless fact-checkers to work on that.

    (That post linked above is just more evidence that the proles on Ricochet are far more able, informed, and honest than The Dispatch could ever be.)

    • #3
    • November 11, 2020, at 11:45 AM PST
    • 3 likes
    • This comment has been edited.
  4. kedavis Member

    I suspect that their own site comments are filled with praise. So what?

    • #4
    • November 11, 2020, at 1:34 PM PST
    • 1 like
  5. Stina Member

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    And for the uncurious . . . (that would be you folks at The Dispatch) . . . here is a very long and well-compiled list.

    Please put your useless fact-checkers to work on that.

    (That post linked above is just more evidence that the proles on Ricochet are far more able, informed, and honest than The Dispatch could ever be.)

    Who gave you authorization to produce independent thought?

    • #5
    • November 11, 2020, at 1:59 PM PST
    • 2 likes
  6. Steven Iverson Member

    a few facts:

    More than 100,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have questionable return dates.

    Nearly 35,000 ballots were returned on the same day they were mailed out.

    23,000 have an impossible return date — it is earlier than the ‘sent date.’

    More than 9,000 have no sent date.

    More than 100,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have unlikely or impossible return dates, based on a researcher’s analysis of the state’s voter database.

    Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have an impossible return date—earlier than the sent date.

    https://meaninginhistory.blogspot.com/

    • #6
    • November 11, 2020, at 4:58 PM PST
    • 1 like
    • This comment has been edited.