Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Increasingly, the progressive left has abandoned the cause of decriminalization in favor of decarceration, expanding the terms of the debate around criminal justice reform to include the virtual abolition of criminal justice as we know it. What was the genesis of this idea, and what could its political consequences be?
Subscribe to The Commentary Magazine Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.
Your closing music should be a bassoon solo.
The crime arguments are also tied into Critical Race Theory. Blacks commit crimes because they are othered/poor due to racism, therefore black crime shouldn’t be punished and in part, it’s karma for white privilege
It’s wrapped in a general reform argument, but for the most part, the goal isn’t tearing down the entire justice system, just the part that punishes black people.
You know this because the same people who argue “criminal reform” and “reduced sentences for nonviolent offenders” want to throw the book at Republicans or rich white people or Trump and give them the maximum amount of pain.
When I read the op-ed in Sunday’s time, I was struck by how far she was down Alice’s moral rabbit hole. The individual could not be culpable, because of her abuse that, purported, affected her brain development. But society (the government that failed to protector) could be culpable, and so its individual members were collectively culpable. In this view (which I think common to many progressive causes), people not culpable because of anything they did, but only because of a culpable group to which they are assigned.
The left still wants prisons. They just call them re-education camps.
George Soros already has all our names, addresses, and offences in his database. When the revolution happens, we will all be collected and shipped off.
Two points:
The first: In the opening sentences, JPod speaks of the unreliability of the present resident of the White House, citing it as in indication that the relief bill might not be signed. Please, Mr. Podhoretz, what is the basis for this opinion? Please cite the “numerous” (as in none) where Mr. Trump refused to sign a bill, especially one as significant as this?
And second: regarding the priority for vaccines, might it best be determined by efficacy? That is, if administering vaccinations to prisoners significantly reduced the spread, thereby possibly saving unknown numbers of lives, wouldn’t that be a preferable choice? Trying to determine who “deserves” the vaccine is an impossible task.