Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
House Democrats will deliver to the Senate a single, hastily-passed article of impeachment against former President Trump. A trial is set to begin two weeks later, on February 9. It will be an event without precedent — the first time in U.S. history that a former president will be tried in a court of impeachment. But does the Constitution even allow a trial for an ex-president? Democrats of course say yes, but the precedent is pretty flimsy, and there is plenty of reason to believe just the opposite. So just why do Democrats think they can go after Trump one last time? A look at a what is sure to be an impassioned, and very weird, argument.
Subscribe to The Daily Memo, Byron’s email newsletter here.
Subscribe to The Byron York Show in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.
Clear and concise as usual.
Congress supposedly loves compromise or at least that was the story when I was growing up, so I offer a compromise. Hold the trial and if found guilty the President (Biden) is removed.
There is an argument to be made to not have a trial. There is an argument to be made to have a trial. A majority of Senators will have enough legal cover to do whatever they want.
With Justice Roberts refusing to participate, it’s a mock trial anyway.