Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The president lays out the reasons why he thinks he won.
Subscribe to Andrew Klavan Show in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.
Same old excuse making – go along to get along. You say “there is not enough to reverse the outcome”.
I have the same question. How much fraud is acceptable? Bunk! They have been allowed to cheat for so long that it is OK now?
A few counter points:
3. As @dudleydoright49 noted in the comment above, how have you objectively quantified the number of fraudulent votes to know with certainty that they are not enough to overturn the current projected results? How much fraud should we accept? We don’t know. It is appropriate to aggressively investigate.
4. In the case of PA, Trump tried to stop the mail-in voting and the extension of timelines, and the dropping of signature verification. The PA supremes said he had no case before the voting happened, now afterwards, the same court says it is too late to challenge. A beautiful Catch 22.