Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
We are in an information crisis.
Subscribe to Andrew Klavan Show in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.
My Woke neice has declared Klavan to be “the devil.”
She dislikes Michael Knowles more.
I could only laugh.
Drew,
You seriously think there is no fraud? Have you read or listened to anything by Tim Pool? Anything from the Federalist? I think even Ben Shapiro suggests there was (although maybe no more than normal).
The operative question is whether fraud can be proven in court. At the moment, as Klavan notes, fraud is not even being alleged or argued in court by Trump’s people at the moment. You can’t win on a basis you’re not pursuing legally.
I get that yes. I thought however, that The Klavan had said there is no proof of fraud. I could be wrong. But there are sworn affidavits about actual fraud. Yes? So … fraud, yes?
Likewise the examining politics podcast in the Ricochet suite, from November 30, includes Phil Klein of the Amistad project making plain allegations of actual illegal voting practices based on actual evidence of fraud.
Is that not evidence of fraud?
And this? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/whistleblowers-post-office-labeled-trump-mail-undeliverable-388-000-ballots-backdated-disappear
i read that Amistad is “unveiling” these “whistleblowers” … so not court testimony but is this not evidence of fraud? Not an expert, don’t even play one online but …