LARRY’S VACATION IS OVER!

PROF. JOHN EASTMAN
Constitutional Law Professor, Trump campaign attorney
In what could be President Trump’s final legal gambit, John Eastman filed a case with the Supreme Court today challenging the constitutionality related to how Pennsylvania handled mail-in ballots contrary to that state’s legislature’s direction. 

PHIL KERPEN
American Commitment
The science and data (or lack thereof) behind recent government restrictions in the wake of a covid case surge. Also, Kerpen analyzes some of the hidden outrages embedded in the 5,000+ page covid relief bill.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Subscribe to Examining Politics in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

There are 4 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Richard Easton Member
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Professor Eastman disagreed with the common assertion on R that the Trump team has lost 50+ lawsuits. In most cases, the courts have dismissed them without hearing the evidence.

    • #1
  2. MISTER BITCOIN Member
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Professor Eastman disagreed with the common assertion on R that the Trump team has lost 50+ lawsuits. In most cases, the courts have dismissed them without hearing the evidence.

    Eastman is correct. Trump has not been the plaintiff in most of the 50+ lawsuits.

    Which reminds me… 74 million Americans did not vote for Trump, it was more than 74 million…

    74 million plus or 74 million + !!!

     

    • #2
  3. MISTER BITCOIN Member
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Professor Eastman disagreed with the common assertion on R that the Trump team has lost 50+ lawsuits. In most cases, the courts have dismissed them without hearing the evidence.

    These cases have been a catch 22:

    You have no evidence because evidence is being hidden and/or destroyed

    You have evidence but it’s too late

    You have evidence but you haven’t been harmed

    You have evidence but it’s not material

    You have evidence but we don’t want to hear it and work in December

     

    • #3
  4. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    The bad structure of this election cannot be resolved after the election.

    • #4