Conservative Conversation + Podcasts

Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!

Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. The Joys of Snobbery

 

shutterstock_22218943Is it possible to be “discerning” and have “refined” tastes without being a grump? Can a person be sharply critical of art and entertainment without being constantly annoyed by mediocre works?

In seeking what is good and beautiful, should we readily dismiss lesser works? Should we try to overlook flaws in order to appreciate as much as possible? Or is that settling?

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Private Security to Seal the Border?

 

US-Mexico-Border-StnsThe fundamental problem with every immigration reform proposal is that most of us don’t trust politicians, Republicans or Democrats, to enforce the border. In principle, this is one of a government’s primary duties. But, assuming the Feds want no part of it, perhaps there is a private alternative.

Might it be feasible for a private security firm, funded by donors interested in border enforcement, to set up along the Mexican border with the permission of individual land owners?

A 24/7 presence of armed men not restrained by bureaucratic policies and politics could be an intimidating presence that would deter trespassers. Legally, it would be no different than any business protecting its own property with security guards.

It’s not a plan without risks and weaknesses. Obviously, federal politicians and bureaucrats would find ways to harass and deter such initiatives. If trespassers were detained, there remains the problem of federal officials refusing to send them immediately back to Mexico. Some properties might become war zones between guards and cartels, but anyone signing up for the security role would know the risks and difficulties.

Yay or nay?

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. The Not-So-Protestant Work Ethic

 

398px-Grant_Wood_-_American_Gothic_-_Google_Art_ProjectIs “the Protestant work ethic” a myth? Isn’t it really an Anglophile work ethic? Or perhaps it’s a German work ethic (English culture originating from old Germanic / North European tribes). Is the term often applied to the growing Protestant communities in South America, Africa, and Asia?

After the many discussions on Ricochet of salvation by “faith alone” — a belief ultimately shared by Catholics, strangely enough — it seems that defining assertion would, if anything lead to lazier peoples, not more productive ones. There are other differences between Catholics and Protestants, of course. But that one has always been primary.

There have been statistics cited here before showing common incidence of poverty and corruption in Catholic nations. But, as I recall, none of those nations are derived from British culture.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. What Video Games Can Teach Us About Narrative

 

Earlier this week, I addressed the potential for popular fiction to be compelling without being exclusively fun. Yesterday, I introduced the sandbox model of games, which offers opportunities for learning without direct instruction. Today, I will discuss instruction and persuasion through traditional storytelling and its translation into interactive environments.

The potential of traditional storytelling to offer insights or arguments doesn’t need to be explained. We are all familiar with the occasional power of novels and movies to make us consider, reflect, imagine, or feel. But it’s worth noting that not all linear fiction is focused on plot. Some stories are driven by events. Others are driven by characters. Even static settings can be major themes by themselves, which is why so many fans of The Lord of the Rings, Star Trek, or the Aubrey-Maturin series dig into lore and history in addition to enjoying those narratives. Sometimes, we are challenged to unravel puzzles and to anticipate the next plot twist. Other times, we passively enjoy witnessing the interplay between a group of delightful companions, without any expectation of final resolution.

Middle Earth

All of this is possible in game fiction. What distinguishes games from more passive entertainment is interactivity. In any game, one way or another, it is the player’s role to take action and to move the story forward.

Games can differ from films by varying degrees. The most film-like products challenge players to solve puzzles, to defeat or escape foes, or to navigate motion trials (a race, for example) without offering the player any control over character development or plot. In these games, the player does not direct contents much as unlock it. Cinematic sequences called “cutscenes” which temporarily remove player control punctuate periods of intense action and serve as rewards for overcoming challenges.

On the other hand, blockbuster games increasingly incorporate “divergent storytelling” into their story arcs. Mass Effect is a popular science fiction series by Canadian developer Bioware which provides serious and powerful Hollywood-quality plots while simultaneously empowering players to make significant choices within the greater narrative. This is accomplished through dialog trees that enable players to determine the courses of conversation and even the fates of central characters.

Here are two examples of branching, interactive storytelling.

In the first video, the consequences of the player’s choices do not directly relate to the main plotline, yet the scenario invites deep reflection and bears emotional weight. The player-character has been approached by a man whose wife was killed in a recent battle. The man requests that the protagonist help him to convince the military to release his wife’s body for burial. Though Bioware’s limited resources prevented them from providing every option a player might desire, and bias is certainly evident in the selections offered, the player is given more nuanced options than simply to help or not help the grieving husband.

In the second video — this one from Mass Effect 2 — the consequences of the player’s choices in the first Mass Effect game carry over into the sequel. In a dramatic moment in the first game, the player-character must choose which of two key characters to save. The woman in the scene above would not even exist in Mass Effect 2 had the player made a different choice in Mass Effect 1. Furthermore, this character is only a love interest of the protagonist in the sequel because the player chose to make it so in the original game.

These are examples of storytelling through dialog options. But players may also be empowered to affect plot elements through non-verbal actions, such as saving a hostage before he is killed, discovering useful resources, or gathering allies.

More importantly, these examples demonstrate an advantage that the video game medium has over traditional fiction like novels and movies. Whereas in older art forms, the audience can refine habits of moral appraisal by identifying with the scripted choices of this or that character and wondering what one’s own decisions might have been in similar situations, a narrative-game player can actually simulate those decisions and be presented with consequences. Game developers can guide the player through a variety of “What if…” scenarios and show where each decision or reaction might lead.

Your thoughts?

Next time, I’ll explore the near future of game persuasion in the forms of environmental feedback and post-script narration.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Learning In Games: Sandboxes

 

Yesterday, argued that that it’s more important for narrative art — be it literature, film, or video games — to be compelling, rather than fun or even enjoyable. Now, continuing my response to Ian Bogost’s article in The Atlantic, I will focus on one of the ways games and other interactive media can be educational or persuasive.

Bogost refers to the popular SimCity game series by Will Wright, which has endured from the days of DOS and Amiga to modern hardware platforms. Like many of Wright’s games, SimCity plays off a Montessori style in which one learns through free experimentation with objects and systems. Bogost oddly avoids the common industry jargon for such environments: sandbox games.

Games of this sort are increasingly popular as better technology and bigger budgets enable developers to simulate ever more complex systems. Articles about the rise of “open world” games on newer hardware platforms abound. Major publishers like Electronic Arts and Ubisoft have invested heavily in open world intellectual properties.

Sandbox learning can be as simple as a young child pushing sand together to learn physical and artistic concepts of modeling, among other lessons. LEGOs, Lincoln Logs, and marble runs are examples of physical sandbox-style products. A chemistry set or microscope can be a “sandbox game” if the child is left to experiment freely. Spare lumber, nails, and tools can result in a similar fun.

A “game” is a form of play involving set rules and goals. While sandbox games are the most free-form and least game-like the medium allows, designers do influence the available methods of play with their products.

The key features of a compelling sandbox game are accessibility and flexibility. “Quick to learn, slow to master” is the design philosophy behind many such systems. If the player is not intimidated by difficulty or overwhelmed by options in early interactions, then he may gradually challenge himself to accomplish greater feats with the same tools and resources. Ideally, those assets can be applied in many ways, combinations, and arrangements. There is no end to what can be constructed with LEGOs or Minecraft.

The more the player accomplishes without becoming overly frustrated, the more the player dreams of doing. Sandbox video games also strive to reward player creativity through awards and opportunities for sharing with fellow players.

Contrary to the Atlantic article, the slow decline of the SimCity series has had less to do with the popularity of character-driven versus system-driven design than with increased competition, specific design choices in sequels, and — perhaps — difficulty in limiting political biases as technology enabled more specific and detailed simulations. In fact, “sim” (simulation) games continue to succeed financially as a distinct genre of products. Many industries and systems have been popularly simulated as games, from zoos and restaurants to macro-evolution and epidemiology. Flight simulators were some of the first hit computer games. Most popular simulators today are designed for mobile platforms like phones and tablets.

In my next post I’ll discuss the didactic potential of games through characters and narrative. In the meantime, any thoughts or questions?

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Back to School

 

shutterstock_28662005How many people here have been to college more than once? By that, I mean that years passed between a first and second degree, perhaps even in unrelated fields. When did you go back? Why did you go back? How was it different the second time?

I didn’t make the most of my first college experience. Since I decided to focus my career on my writing skills, an English major seemed appropriate. One doesn’t need a degree to learn to write. But employers expect a degree. So there I was, grudgingly. That grudging attitude wasn’t helpful. Nor were the frivolous elective courses. And if any degree would do, I was stupid to pursue a degree in the Liberal Arts.

So now, a decade later, I’m looking into programming degree plans. Any advice? Is an Associate’s degree sufficient for many decent jobs? I’m considering an AAS (Associate of Applied Science) with advanced certificates in C++ and Visual Basic. Programming experience would be useful in many fields, both for corporate and entrepreneurial efforts. But I’m particularly interested in game design, of which I’m fairly familiar and have connections.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Split-Religion Marriages and Conversions

 

When I was a young teenager, my dad got pulled into the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults when a neighbor asked my dad to sponsor him through the process of conversion. The man’s wife was Catholic, so he was considering the Church’s beliefs with charitable patience. My father has participated in RCIA ever since, in varying capacities.

These days, one of his favorite TV programs is The Journey Home in which host Marcus Grodi interviews converts to Catholicism about their conversion experiences. Baptists, Lutherans, Mormons, Jews, housewives, lawyers, scientists, preachers — The show is fascinating because of the endless variety of origin stories, which provide insights and nuances which cradle Catholics like myself often have never considered.

A common theme in conversion stories is marriage or courtship to someone of a different faith. My siblings all married individuals of different theological backgrounds. Thus far, these have not resulted in any conversions, one way or the other. Best I can estimate, that general scenario of an ongoing theological difference seems as common among marriages as are conversions of one spouse to the other’s faith… or abandonment of faith altogether (surrender).

There are certainly degrees of separation and pressure to convert in marriage. Lutherans and Catholics, for example, are not as far apart as Baptists and Catholics. But even spouses who generally agree might run into significant hurdles in regard to the raising of their children; such as in regard to the timing of baptism (infant or adult), the importance of worship with a community, the roles of priests and preachers, or the centrality of the Eucharist.

The Ricochet community includes many mixed-religion marriages and conversion-through-marriage stories. I would love to hear them. What factored into your decisions? On what were you willing or not willing to bend? How did the relationship with your spouse change your views? How did your religious beliefs shape your relationship?

I would also be interested to hear stories from individuals whose faith was strengthened, rather than altered, by marriage and similar relationships.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. When In Riyadh

 

Drudge is making a big deal of Michelle Obama’s decision not to hide her hair while in Riyadh with the President. Kudos to the First Lady? 

Pretend, for a moment, that the story does not concern two vile people who would sooner spit on you than respect you as a political opponent. What should be the general rule in regard to diplomatic presentation, as opposed to diplomatic content? When in Riyadh, do as the Saudis do? Or dress and behave like an American, always and everywhere?

Also, this story is a far cry from the hubbub years ago about President Obama bowing to a Saudi leader. Did the President learn something from his critics? Why cater to foreign customs then and not now? Or are the President’s concerns irrelevant to his wife’s behavior?

Image Credit: Flickr user US Department of State.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Manly Preferences

 

Which is the more manly preference: 1) the practical, 2) whatever one feels like, and to heck with anybody’s opinion of it, or 3) the opposite of whatever women like?

For example, soaps. A female friend once observed that I was the only guy she knew who buys scented hand soap. Undoubtedly, many guys would say it is unmanly to care about scents. But obviously they do care. Otherwise, they would sometimes get the scented and sometimes the unscented because they don’t pay attention to the labels. The way I figure it, if a soap that smells like coconut or lemon costs no more than soap than smells like lye, then it is practical to buy the soap that smells better. I can understand as a man not wanting to smell like flowers. But fretting about scents while pretending to not care doesn’t strike me as very manly.

Is it manly to dress in whatever is comfortable and suits one’s own personality? Or is it manly to dress according to what society expects of him? Suits, for example, were invented by Northerners who need multiple layers to stay warm. Is it manly to cook in the Southern summer sun? If cargo pants with many pockets are useful but not stylish, which is more practical and/or manly: utility or conformity?

Is it more manly to love a dangerous activity because of its dangers or despite its dangers? Does a man enjoy being daring? Or is he merely willing to be daring? In such scenarios, what’s the difference between a man’s man and an idiot?

Beards? Mustaches? Clean-shaven? Is this decision purely subjective?

Feel free to propose your own crossroads.

 

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Fictional Advice For Fictional Authors

 

shutterstock_172002743Writing a novel or two (or ten) is on my bucket list. I’ve jotted down ideas, notes, scraps of dialog from a dozen different stories. But I have yet to actually write a book… even a bad one. This, despite the ubiquitous advice from published authors that writing anything every day is the biggest step. Do Ricochet comments count?

I have read books on the various processes of many authors, which is a bit like asking people in every state in the USA for directions to Oklahoma City. Strangely, they disagree. Still, I appreciate the suggestions.

So what are your suggestions? Ricochet has more authors than Obama’s autobiography. What are some habits or surprises that worked for you?

Most importantly, how did you get started? Did you begin with an outline or a scene? Did you know your main characters from the start? Are those characters people you know, tweaked ever so cruelly? How detailed was your plot in the beginning?

Any kind of advice is welcome, from anybody. Poetry and short stories are fair game, though I am most eager for book tips. All genres: I have an odd assortment of ideas to start from, including a werewolf philosophical thriller and a stupidly fun satire of video games.

Alas! Alack! A lot!

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. The Joy of Being Used

 

shutterstock_233760664Generosity is annoying. When a person is skilled or able in some way, others inevitably ask favors of him. A sense of charitable duty can make refusal difficult. Often, one is not feeling particularly generous when a loved one, coworker, or neighbor requests aid. Their needs are perceived as interruptions. But problems can’t be scheduled.

My brother is an IT wiz. It seems like hell. Anyone and everyone who runs into a problem even tangentially related to computers or electronics looks to him for help. To his credit, he always answers. With so many IT people offering free help to family and friends these days, it’s amazing anyone ever needs to pay for service!

My youngest sister is a physical terrorist… um, therapist. Everyone respects a knowledgeable physician, right? But the price of that knowledge is being the unpaid resource of every close acquaintance (and some distant ones, too). Family members don’t have to say a word. One just stands or moves awkwardly, and the help comes before anyone involved is ready for it. “Ouch! Um, I mean, thanks.”

Which brings me to my point.

As a tall and healthy young man, I have always been at everyone’s disposal whether or not I really wanted to be. “Can you reach this?” “Would you carry these?” “I need someone to… ” And so on. I have been loaned out to friends of family more times than I can remember. But I am beginning to reach the age when the body periodically goes on strike, perhaps in demand of better pay (food). Right now, I have bursitis in both shoulders — probably from poor posture while in front of computers — and consequently cannot help in many ways that I previously would have.

At least for a while, I have lost the opportunities to be generous in these ways. And strangely, I find myself missing such occasions to be bothered.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Firecrackers!

 

tankAre fireworks allowed in your area? If so, which did you enjoy this New Year’s? Which were disappointments that you wish you’d burned before you payed for them?

What fireworks of yesteryear earned their places in Valhalla? Have you forgiven your parents yet for black snakes? Is your closet full of poppers and candy cigarettes?

Speak now or forever hold your powder!

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Power Without Production

 

shutterstock_217626877About 33 minutes into the last Ricochet Podcast, Bret Stephens added his voice to the chorus suggesting we shouldn’t overly fret about China because their economic numbers are rigged and their production levels are nowhere close to our own, however quickly they are improving. Alright, let’s suppose that China’s economy is truly lackluster. Does that make it less of a diplomatic and military threat?

The Soviet Union was doomed from the start for the simple reason that communism doesn’t work. The USSR survived by claiming territories and sucking the life out of its members, which it could only do for so long. It’s economy never had a chance in the long run.

But that inevitability didn’t matter for half a century.

Americans across the nation constructed bomb shelters. We kept bombers in the air at all times so the Soviets would be certain that we could retaliate if they attacked American soil with nuclear weapons. We fought proxy wars in Asia and South America. Soviet spies infiltrated our government and media. The US invested countless resources in technological competition to maintain military advantages. Conservatives’ most revered president in living memory made defeating the Soviet Union his top priority.

Production isn’t everything. It’s significant, but it does not by itself determine global influence.

That said, I doubt China is presently a threat to our homeland. But it can upset our interests abroad and weaken our position in the world. That’s worth a little fretting.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Hack Away

 

shutterstock_232080763To the Washington Post’s report on the North Korean hack job (no, the other one), Drudge offers the following headline: “Cancellation sets worrying new precedent for cyber terror.”

Well, sure, it’s “new” in the sense that it just happened. And the attack did take a novel form, combining the data diarrhea of WikiLeaks with jihad’s pointedly obscure threats to silence opposition.

But we are already chock full of precedents, thank you. Cyber attacks from Russia and China over a course of decades have shown the world our response policy: “Pretty please?”

“Not so!” says Ellen Nakashima over at the Washington Post:

The administration has made clear for several years that it has a range of diplomatic, economic, legal and military options at its disposal in response to cyberattacks.

Oh? Do y’all remember our last action against foreign hackers? Because I sure don’t.

It is unlikely, however, that officials will announce the responses it is considering or the one it chooses. “There’s a lot of options,” the official said. “They likely won’t be discussed publicly anytime soon.”

I see. But they will be discussed eventually, right? Better yet, don’t tell me! After all, if you have to explain America’s punitive response, then it couldn’t have been very forceful. As my fiction teacher said years ago, “Show. Don’t tell.” And America’s cyber defense is nothing if not good fiction.

How many of you believe that the North Korean government will suffer any serious consequences for publishing an American company’s secrets, disrupting transactions that supported multi-million-dollar projects, and threatening the lives of American civilians across the country? How many of you believe America actually has a cyber defense policy with teeth?

The whole article by Nakashima is worth reading, by the way.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Benghazi, The Expendables, and Conservative Action Heroes

 

4840005067_80f5902a00_zThe Expendables movies are good, silly, manly fun. The many references to classic action movies are rewarding. The older actors poke fun at themselves and harass each other, as men are wont to do. And there’s a lot of cool guns, hard hits, and big explosions. It’s G.I. Joe for adults.

I caught the third movie last night, and was surprised by a clear reference to the Benghazi scandal. Contrary to claims on Breitbart and Fox News, the character Galgo (Antonio Banderas) does not mention terrorists or diplomats. His experience is only a reflection of the real attack and not the murder specifically. Nevertheless, it is an obvious allusion to reality.

“It all went bad,” Galgo says. “We waited for support. No one ever came. Everybody died,” Galgo tells Barney.

I wish I could thank Sylvester Stallone for including it in the script.

Maybe Rob could invite him onto the podcast. I know Kelsey Grammar is generally conservative, as is (my favorite actor) Mel Gibson and Robert Davi, who are also in the film. Grammar and Davi both acted in a mildly amusing parody of liberalism called An American Carol back in 2008.

Now that I think about it, previous Expendables actor Bruce Willis votes Republican as well. And Schwarzenegger ran as a Republican, even if he wasn’t all Republicans hoped he would be as governor.

Is there some reason that action stars in Hollywood so commonly break from the liberal mold?

By the way, The Expendables 3 is worth seeing if only to witness Harrison Ford making fun of Jason Statham’s accent.

Image Credit: Flickr user Gage Skidmore.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. A Life Schematic or Just Winging It?

 

Were the most important decisions of your life all the result of cold, hard math? Or did you ever follow your gut?

How did those decisions turn out? Did your grand strategies collapse under unforeseeable circumstances? Did your enthusiasm for impulsive or intuitive commitments wane? Or have your preparations proved fertile? Have your feelings guided you to joyful, surprising experiences?

Did the nature of those decisions make it more or less difficult to adapt to new circumstances later on?

We conservatives regularly discuss all kinds of careful designs for an individual’s life: retirement plans, courtship and marital customs, educational paths, social networking strategies, etc. I wonder if we emphasize such planning too much or too little.

To what extent should life be mapped? What things are better discovered or responded to on-the-fly? How important are improvisation skills? What is the role of emotions in life, if not to direct us?

I think perhaps that ‘The grass is always greener on the other side.” The statisticians of the world wish they had been more impulsive. Free spirits wish they had made more plans.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. If I Was Emperor…

 

585px-Map_of_ScandinaviaApparently, some Swedes are worried that Putin has his eye on Scandinavia for a future playground. I will let Annika fill y’all in later.
Though I am fairly sure that Putin is not done helping poor lost Russians in neighboring states to secure their due right to rejoin the empire, I find it difficult to imagine an invasion of Sweden before an invasion of Estonia or Latvia. I suspect that the order of conquest will follow the path of least resistance. But perhaps not.

In any case, can we agree that would-be conquerors everywhere probably perceive Obama’s remaining years in office as an ideal time for action?

If so, might they take bigger bites than they otherwise would because of the limited window of opportunity?

Or, if you were emperor, would you let Obama’s presidency play out peacefully, in hope that America will weaken and withdraw further… and that the next American President will also be a Democrat?

Image Credit: “Map of Scandinavia” by 000peter – Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. First-World Predicaments

 

shutterstock_164988680So, I’m reclining in a chair at the bedside of an old man, asleep, in a nursing home. Life is easy when the senile sleep.

On the other side of my chair is a coffee table with a single item, taunting me: a container of delicious cookies.

The catch is that it’s one of those clear plastic snap containers they sell in the bakeries of supermarkets. If I try to open it, the loud snapping will undoubtedly wake my slumbering charge.

Diabolical!

What are some first-world problems you have encountered lately?

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. The Idea of Ideology

 

When did “ideological” become a criticism?

If you are not ideological, then you are blowing in the wind. Your thoughts are shallow and your actions are whimsical.

An ideology is a cohesive set of assumptions and goals that guides one’s judgments and decisions. These ideas direct and motivate one to consistent actions. Without a foundation of core goals and principles, a person is likely to contradict himself and fall prey to fleeting passions.

So what do people mean when they dismiss opposing views as “just ideology” and dismiss opponents as “ideologues?” Are they playing a rhetorical game to fool uncritical minds? Or do they actually believe that they themselves do not adhere to any ideology?

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Technophobia

 

shutterstock_83454223Do you dream in monochrome? Does the term “manual labor” recall painful memories of assembly or installation? Does the Geek Squad avoid your phone calls? Then this post is for you.

What current inventions do you loathe? What innovations do you fear are inevitable? What old products do you miss and are certain you could enjoy again?

I dread the day that my car requires a poorly timed reboot while it updates its software via on-again/off-again satellite internet. “Please wait while we improve your driving experience.”

Image Credit: Shutterstock user Creatista.

Aaron Miller

Profile picture of Aaron Miller

@aaronmiller