Conservative Conversation + Podcasts

Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!

Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.

Alec Dent's Posts

Alec Dent's Member Feed posts are visible only to other Ricochet members! Please or Register.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. ‘Joker’ Is Incomplete Without Batman

 

“What would I do without you?” The Joker asks Batman in The Dark Knight. “You complete me.” He’s right in more ways than he realizes, as the newly released Joker shows: the Joker, by his very nature, needs Batman, and, more importantly, so does the audience. Because without the Dark Knight there to serve as a ballast, the Joker’s anarchic, twisted, disturbing nature, and Joker itself, becomes unbearably difficult to watch.

Admittedly, in terms of film qua film, Joker succeeds in what it sets out to do. It’s well directed, Joaquin Phoenix turns in an incredible performance as the titular character, and the story provides creepy insight into the psyche of its psychopathic subject. And in fairness, Phoenix’s Joker is not necessarily more evil than past incarnations of the character. Heath Ledger’s turn as the Clown Prince of Crime, for example, was just as twisted, just as nihilistic. Also, Batman: The Killing Joke featured a Joker committing acts just as depraved and horrific. These Jokers, however, did not exist in a vacuum, and the stories in which they’re present also feature counters to their dangerous ideology.

Joker, in comparison, is devoid of any sort of moral challenge to its villain. Watching someone engage in truly despicable, grotesque evil on screen without anyone rising to challenge it, without any sense of hope for viewers is a truly painful experience, one that unsettled me so deeply I had to turn away from the screen on several occasions and nearly walked out at one point—and I managed to sit through the entirety of The Shape of Water, so that’s saying something. With scenes of murder that are realistically graphic and intense, it feels almost as if you’re watching artfully shot found footage of homicides. While it is unfair to say that Joker celebrates its protagonist, or even that it portrays him in a sympathetic light, the movie makes no argument against him, relying solely on the audience to pass judgement on the character.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Mr. Tinder, or, How I Learned to Start Worrying and Hate the App

 

Last week, the most popular man on Tinder was all over the news for finally finding love. Stefan Pierre-Tomlin was named “Mr. Tinder” back in 2017, after accumulating 14,600 right-swipes in a mere two years, an all-time record according to the app. An untold number of likes later, Pierre-Tomlin says he’s found the love of his life, but, in one large, delicious dollop of irony, not on the app that earned him his moniker. Pierre-Tomlin met his girlfriend in person, through a friend—or as tabloid headlines are declaring “the old-fashioned way,” which is a fairly damning critique of modern society if non-digital meetings are indeed now considered passé.

Pierre-Tomlin’s story alone is, of course, purely anecdotal evidence, but when viewed with available statistics on apps and modern dating culture, it paints a rather nasty picture. Out of all his matches, for example, Pierre-Tomlin only found two women with whom he had relationships. Which shouldn’t really be surprising: according to one survey, only 44 percent of women and 38.4 percent of men on dating apps are looking for a serious relationship.

(A slightly unrelated but still interesting aside: 0.8 percent of women on these apps are in it for free food and drinks, while 2.9 percent of men are. I’m not sure what to do with that information, but there you go.)

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’ Reminds Us That Hippies Are Gross

 

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Quentin Tarantino’s latest flick, hit the big screen on Friday. The film’s message can be summed up in one short, and crass, line delivered by protagonist Rick Dalton (Leonardo Dicaprio): “dirty [expletive] hippies.”

While Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is nominally the story of Dalton, a washed-up actor struggling to remain relevant, it is just as much about hippies and, as the quote from Dalton indicates, how awful they were. It is, essentially, a two-hour, 45-minute middle finger to hippies.

The countercultural movement often gets viewed through rose-colored lenses. Its themes of peace and love do seem appealing, and the notion that swaths of the country dedicated themselves to promoting those ideals does sound nice. In theory. The actual movement was fairly, for lack of a better word, gross. Tarantino brings this oft-unexplored aspect of hippiedom to the forefront of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, and doesn’t shy away from depicting the nasty reality of the bohemian life.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Mainstreaming of Nerd Culture

 

This is the first time it’s ever happened. It came close last year, closer than it’s ever been before, but even then it felt a little…well, a little forced. People like superhero movies, sure, and Wonder Woman was good enough, but a Best Picture nomination at the Academy Awards? Isn’t that reserved for films a bit more highbrow than superhero flicks? But here we are, one year later, and one such movie has made the jump: Black Panther has received a nod from the Academy in the Best Picture category, and a few others too. And nobody is surprised. Frankly, it would have been a bit shocking not to see Black Panther among the nominees. Not because it necessarily deserves a nomination, but because we’ve been moving toward this for a while now. “This” referring not just to the acceptance of CGI-slugfests at the Oscars, but towards a broader cultural movement. “This” referring to the mainstreaming of geek culture.

That traditionally nerdy interests are entering the mainstream is far from a controversial proposition. Comic book movies have dominated cinema the past few years and will likely do so for some time to come. There is no film more hotly anticipated this year than Avengers: Endgame, and in 2018 Black Panther was the highest earning film of the year in America. Four more movies based on comic book properties took spots in the domestic top 10 last year, along with a movie from the equally geeky genre of sci-fi, Solo: A Star Wars Story. 2017 saw a similar pattern, with Star Wars: The Last Jedi taking the top spot in the American market and five comic book movies occupying spots in the top 10. And back in 2016, a Star Wars movie ended the year first again, with four comic book movies joining it in the top 10.

And it’s not just the big screen, the reach of geek culture extends to television as well. Ever heard of a show called Game of Thrones? How about Westworld? Rick and Morty? And as if one Star Trek show on the air wasn’t enough, CBS is developing another that focuses just on Jean-Luc Picard, a very French name that just doesn’t seem to fit the very British Patrick Stewart who plays him. Even more shocking than the success of nerdy-topic TV shows is how the portrayal of nerds has shifted as well. Nerds are now the heroes in shows like The Big Bang Theory and its spin-off Young Sheldon, Parks and Rec, and, most especially, Stranger Things.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. When Is a Christmas Classic Not a Classic?

 

Christmas time, to borrow a phrase from Charlie Brown and the gang, is here and with it comes all the yuletide traditions: hot chocolate, festive tunes, gingerbread men—sorry, gingerbread persons—and, of course, Christmas movies. It’s a Wonderful Life! Miracle on 34th Street! Scrooged! Those claymation movies from the ’60s and ’70s that aren’t actually very good, but skate by on pure nostalgia! And, as is wont to happen, such old classics have been joined over the years by more recent offerings, like the Jim Carrey Grinch remake, The Polar Express, Elf, and Love Actually, movies that, in their brief time on this earth, have ingratiated themselves into the holiday season to the point that they’re regularly lumped together with Miracle on 34th Street, et al., as Christmas “classics.” The only problem is: they’re not.

Now, I don’t mean to cast aspersions on the quality of these movies—though, cards on the table, I do think most of them are not very good, especially Elf—but merely suggest that we jump the gun in declaring modern works “classics.” The simple fact is, we don’t get to contemporaneously decide what earns the title, and, what’s more, are probably the worst judges of what from our pop culture deserves such esteem. We have a say in how popular a work is, certainly, but as Anthony Patch posited in The Beautiful and Damned, a classic needs to be more than popular, it needs to prove it’s not just a trend by “surviv[ing] the reaction of the next period or generation.” And to do so, it has to be something of enduring value, something that isn’t just a product of its time but speaks to eternal themes, to the common human experience.

It’s difficult for us to evaluate recent works because we often struggle to differentiate between what speaks to our culture and what transcends it. We know the references, the actors, the very world in which the movies are set. And with social media and Netflix and smartphones creating an outsized role for pop culture in our lives, there’s a sense of nostalgie du present—or nostalgie du just a little while ago—in our relationships with our culture. It’s for these reasons that we tend to rate new movies, television shows, music, etc. as being better than they actually are, in a sort of bizarre artistic recency bias. Out of a generational arrogance, we assume both that our cultural preferences are on par with, if not superior to, those who came before us and that they will be shared by those who come after. But times change and tastes change along with them.

Alec Dent

Profile picture of Alec Dent

@AlecDent