“Gunpocalypse” in California

 
998061_10201868357216797_1901876963_n

Photo courtesy @MPHaus.

Today California legislators sent a slate of 11 anti-gun bills to Gov. Jerry Brown for signature. The collection, dubbed “Gunpocalypse” by gun rights group Firearms Policy Coalition, is a broad attack on 2nd Amendment and 14th Amendment rights. Since Gov. Brown is leaving for vacation in less than 48 hours, activists are scrambling to persuade him to veto the bills before he leaves and Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom takes over.

While Assemblyman Kevin DeLeon claims lawmakers are “just trying to move forward with reasonable gun legislation,” the measures are anything but reasonable. The bills will:

  • Retroactively require serial numbers to be placed on firearms dating back at least 50 years.
  • Ban common and constitutionally protected firearms that have magazine locking devices.
  • Criminalize loaning of firearms between personally known, law-abiding adults, including sportsmen, family members, and competitors.
  • Redefine “firearms” to include objects that are not firearms.
  • Ban buying more than one firearm within a 30-day period.
  • Make conviction of a non-violent misdemeanor a prohibiting offense.
  • Dramatically expand secret “Gun Violence Restraining Orders” to confiscate one’s gun without due process.
  • Re-victimize victims by criminalizing the failure to report lost and stolen firearms.
  • Restrict ammunition purchases, create a DOJ database of ammunition owners.
  • Allow for the confiscation of lawfully acquired, standard capacity ammunition feeding devices.

State Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) stated, “I think this is a strong statement that we’re sending to the rest of the nation.” Indeed, it is. If these bills are allowed to become law, gun grabbers in Congress will be emboldened and attempt their own versions of these laws.

But the “strong statement” they’re making is not exactly the one Sen. Jackson envisions. At least a few of the bills got through the process using deceptive “gut-and-amend” tactics in which a bill that started as something entirely different, say, an environmental bill, ends up as a gun control measure. Also, Assembly Speaker Rendon changed the voting procedures on the gun bills only. Normally if a member leaves the chamber to use the restroom or take a phone call, and misses the vote, they can go back in and change it. Speaker Rendon changed that today to prohibit members from changing their vote — but only on the gun bills.

By using these tactics lawmakers are simply showing their contempt for regular law-abiding citizens, and they’re not shy about it. They don’t believe citizens can be trusted. Sen. Isadore Hall (D-Compton), told reporters there is “massive bloodshed on the streets because people just can’t be responsible with guns.”

Gov. Brown has vetoed some of these bills in prior legislative sessions when they had been passed by both chambers. If public outcry is loud enough, he may veto some or all of them this year. Firearms Policy Coalition has set up a petition page and is urging people to call Gov. Brown’s office to ask him to veto the gun bills.

As we celebrate freedom this weekend, hopefully Californians will not be mourning the loss of the rights so many fought and died for.

Published in Guns
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 30 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Michael Minnott Member
    Michael Minnott
    @MichaelMinnott

    If you are a gun owner in California, it’s time to call Gov. Brown and make yourself heard.  It’s also time to start backing a gun rights organization in the state.

    • #1
  2. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Coming soon to a state near you.

    • #2
  3. Freesmith Member
    Freesmith
    @

    For non-Californians it is important to realize that the only person capable of preventing the Heller decision from being reversed is Donald J. Trump.

    If you like your Second Amendment you can keep your Second Amendment – but only by electing Donald J. Trump.

    • #3
  4. The King Prawn Inactive
    The King Prawn
    @TheKingPrawn

    Freesmith:For non-Californians it is important to realize that the only person capable of preventing the Heller decision from being reversed is Donald J. Trump.

    If you like your Second Amendment you can keep your Second Amendment – but only by electing Donald J. Trump.

    That we are in this position is the cause for much anguish and gnashing of teeth.

    • #4
  5. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Molon Labe.

    • #5
  6. Lily Bart Inactive
    Lily Bart
    @LilyBart

    The tyrants are getting bold.

    • #6
  7. Freesmith Member
    Freesmith
    @

    The King Prawn:

    Freesmith:For non-Californians it is important to realize that the only person capable of preventing the Heller decision from being reversed is Donald J. Trump.

    If you like your Second Amendment you can keep your Second Amendment – but only by electing Donald J. Trump.

    That we are in this position is the cause for much anguish and gnashing of teeth.

    The poor workman blames his tools.

    Sorry, we’ve got a job to do. Enough with the bitching.

    • #7
  8. Locke On Member
    Locke On
    @LockeOn

    Boy am I glad I moved out of there.

    Reality in California is that 2A activism consists of running to court to get a restraining order.

    • #8
  9. The King Prawn Inactive
    The King Prawn
    @TheKingPrawn

    Freesmith:

    The King Prawn:

    Freesmith:For non-Californians it is important to realize that the only person capable of preventing the Heller decision from being reversed is Donald J. Trump.

    If you like your Second Amendment you can keep your Second Amendment – but only by electing Donald J. Trump.

    That we are in this position is the cause for much anguish and gnashing of teeth.

    The poor workman blames his tools.

    Sorry, we’ve got a job to do. Enough with the bitching.

    Blaming the tools is appropriate if they are unsuited to the job. We’re digging a latrine with a fork.

    • #9
  10. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    Why do liberals DEMAND, but conservatives ASK?  Ask Moonbeam to veto the bills?  It’s time for conservatives to present lists of demands.

    • #10
  11. Douglas Inactive
    Douglas
    @Douglas

    Michael Minnott:If you are a gun owner in California, it’s time to call Gov. Brown and make yourself heard. It’s also time to start backing a gun rights organization in the state.

    If you still live in California, its long past time to leave.

    • #11
  12. KC Mulville Inactive
    KC Mulville
    @KCMulville

    In the Supreme Court’s recent decision about abortion facility legislation, the majority (aka Anthony Kennedy) argued that such restrictions were disingenuous attempts to place an undue burden on the right to an abortion.

    I suppose throwing disingenuous attempts to place undue burdens on the Second Amendment right is just different because … well, you know, um … it just is.

    • #12
  13. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Fake John/Jane Galt:Coming soon to a state near you.

    GonzalesFlag

    • #13
  14. Ball Diamond Ball Member
    Ball Diamond Ball
    @BallDiamondBall

    The King Prawn:

    Freesmith:

    The King Prawn:

    Freesmith:For non-Californians it is important to realize that the only person capable of preventing the Heller decision from being reversed is Donald J. Trump.

    If you like your Second Amendment you can keep your Second Amendment – but only by electing Donald J. Trump.

    That we are in this position is the cause for much anguish and gnashing of teeth.

    The poor workman blames his tools.

    Sorry, we’ve got a job to do. Enough with the bitching.

    Blaming the tools is appropriate if they are unsuited to the job. We’re digging a latrine with a fork.

    true, but the tiny coke spoons we were offered did even less.

    • #14
  15. Ray Kujawa Coolidge
    Ray Kujawa
    @RayKujawa

    When does it ever make sense to make legislation with the intended purpose of “sending a message” to people outside of a jurisdiction or a state? That’s what free speech is about. Writing laws is about sending a message to criminals and people who abuse the law and their liberties in your state. For these people, they know California is a great big megaphone on the West Coast and they intend to use it. Strike while the fire’s hot. These people are anything but compassionate. Their compassion is all in their mouths.

    Maybe it’s time for conservatives to start moving back into California to show Californians what real compassion and liberty are about.

    • #15
  16. Lizzie in IL Inactive
    Lizzie in IL
    @LizzieinIL

    Douglas:

    Michael Minnott:If you are a gun owner in California, it’s time to call Gov. Brown and make yourself heard. It’s also time to start backing a gun rights organization in the state.

    If you still live in California, its long past time to leave.

    Those people should move to America.

    • #16
  17. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Freesmith:

    The King Prawn:

    Freesmith:For non-Californians it is important to realize that the only person capable of preventing the Heller decision from being reversed is Donald J. Trump.

    If you like your Second Amendment you can keep your Second Amendment – but only by electing Donald J. Trump.

    That we are in this position is the cause for much anguish and gnashing of teeth.

    The poor workman blames his tools.

    Sorry, we’ve got a job to do. Enough with the bitching.

    You admit, then, that Trump is a tool?

    • #17
  18. Freesmith Member
    Freesmith
    @

    Spin:

    Freesmith:

    The King Prawn:

    Freesmith:For non-Californians it is important to realize that the only person capable of preventing the Heller decision from being reversed is Donald J. Trump.

    If you like your Second Amendment you can keep your Second Amendment – but only by electing Donald J. Trump.

    That we are in this position is the cause for much anguish and gnashing of teeth.

    The poor workman blames his tools.

    Sorry, we’ve got a job to do. Enough with the bitching.

    You admit, then, that Trump is a tool?

    Why, yes, the only “tool” we have to preserve the Second Amendment.

    Do you disagree, or simply find that fact, the cold reality that only Donald J. Trump stands between you and those who would overturn Heller, distasteful and worthy only of snark?

    Well, here’s another one for you to answer: in light of this week’s SCOTUS decision on abortion which, to use Ann Coulter’s notorious tweet, makes it impermissible to restrict abortions from being performed in the White House, who is the one person in America who can conceivably change that reality?

    Name him for me.

    • #18
  19. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    Interestingly, the final no-hearing, gun-grabbing bill, AB 2607,  deletes the following language from  previous versions:

    SECTION 1.

    It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would ensure that California’s public safety system is fair and just.

    The accompanying “Legislative Counsel’s Digest” contains the following deletion:

    Existing law, as set forth in the Constitution of the United States and the California Constitution, establishes certain fundamental personal rights, including, among others, the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable seizures and searches, the right to equal protection of the laws, the right to due process of law before being deprived of life, liberty, or property, the right to a trial by a jury, and the right of a defendant in a criminal case to a speedy public trial.

    This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would ensure that California’s public safety system is fair and just. 

    In other words, the legislature has deliberately passed a law to make California’s public safety system unfair and unjust and deliberately thumbs its nose at the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

    California legislature: “We don’t need no stinkin’ fairness, justice or constitutionality.”

    • #19
  20. George Savage Member
    George Savage
    @GeorgeSavage

    Governor Brown’s phone line is completely overloaded, or perhaps just switched off; it is impossible to get through.

    However, you can email him via his web site.

    • #20
  21. Archie Campbell Member
    Archie Campbell
    @ArchieCampbell

    I sent email to the Gov. this morning. I took it as a good sign that the phone line was busy all morning, until I read George’s comment. It’s sad that I wouldn’t put it past his office to just disconnect that number (916-445-2841, BTW.)

    • #21
  22. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    It is too late to contact Governor Moonbeam.  Here is an article explaining what he signed and what he vetoed.  The author of the article is gun-ignorant and incorrectly stated that “bullet bottons” make it easier to remove a magazine.  They do exactly the opposite.

    • #22
  23. M.D. Wenzel Inactive
    M.D. Wenzel
    @MDWenzel

    If you value your constitutional rights California is probably not the place for you.  You’d probably be happier living elsewhere

    • #23
  24. Funeral Guy Inactive
    Funeral Guy
    @FuneralGuy

    David Carroll:It is too late to contact Governor Moonbeam. Here is an article explaining what he signed and what he vetoed. The author of the article is gun-ignorant and incorrectly stated that “bullet bottons” make it easier to remove a magazine. They do exactly the opposite.

    Technically, you are correct, David.  I would assume what the author means is that absent the standard magazine release or the “bullet button” the magazine is fixed and must be loaded one round at a time.  The Range Officer at my range can change the “bullet button” magazine almost as fast as the regular magazine release.  I’m embarrassed to admit I don’t know that much about newer AR platforms.  I purchased my AR back in the nineties and when they were banned I put mine in the safe and used my Ruger Mini-14 for shooting.  The Mini-14 is proof of the silliness of this “assault weapon” nonsense.  The Mini-14 is basically the same rifle, but has a wood stock.  (I want to shoot the television every time Bill O’Reilly asks “do civilians need these military style heavy weapons?”  If a guest came on his show and said something equally as stupid he’d be all over him.)

    IS IT BECAUSE I’M BLACK? 

    image

    • #24
  25. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    Douglas: If you still live in California, its long past time to leave.

    I’ve lived here my whole life, my family and friends live here, my career is here.  It’ll take more than a few busybodies in the state legislature to drive me out of my home.

    • #25
  26. Craig Inactive
    Craig
    @Craig

    • #26
  27. SUITE3505 Member
    SUITE3505
    @SUITE3505

    All weekend Gavin Newsom is spending his time tweeting about how he is going to eliminate civil rights.  And the outrage in California seems to be non-existent.

    • #27
  28. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Guys while you can legally

    Do it your self Ar 15

    Do it your self 1911

    • #28
  29. Archie Campbell Member
    Archie Campbell
    @ArchieCampbell

    Joseph Stanko:

    Douglas: If you still live in California, its long past time to leave.

    I’ve lived here my whole life, my family and friends live here, my career is here. It’ll take more than a few busybodies in the state legislature to drive me out of my home.

    This is something I wrestle with, as a transplant from a much more pro-gun state: do I move out of CA and cede it to the left-wing idiots, or do I stay and fight? But given that the state assembly has a super-majority of democrats, and that the Republican party is in bad shape here, I don’t even know where to start to help. Do enough people, who agree with Joseph and me, remain here to be able to reverse things?

    • #29
  30. Jennifer Van Laar Member
    Jennifer Van Laar
    @JenniferVanLaar

    Archie,

    I hope you stay and fight for this state. One of the reasons I moved back home is to do just that. There are a good number of people who agree with you and Joseph who remain here… I am active in politics here and have found that one of the biggest obstacles is a Stockholm Syndrome among conservatives who have been here through the whole “occupation.” They almost feel like they have to ask permission to from the Dems – or they just completely tune out of politics, figuring nothing they do will help. In 2014 there were a number of big wins – conservatives elected in traditionally Dem areas. The election of State Sen. Andy Vidak in the central valley was huge. It shows that with the right candidate (a super socially conservative candidate will not win here) and the right ground game, we can do it. It will take a while, but it can be done.

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.