Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Security So Tight at the G20 Even a Gnat Couldn’t Get In … Oh, Wait

 

So yesterday, the heads of the Group of 20 leading world economies arrived in the resort city of Antalya, in Turkey, for a two-day summit. The hotels housing the attendees were separated from the rest of the neighborhood by thousands of barricades. Only accredited visitors were given access to the area. The governor of Antalya, Muammer Türker, proudly announced they’d installed more than 350 new security cameras, and had also inaugurated license plate and facial recognition systems to prevent unauthorized access. The Coast Guard was deployed off the coast of Antalya to interdict threats from sea. Officials were considering establishing a no-fly zone over the area. Some 12,000 police and soldiers were deployed, and the Turkish military promised ’round-the-clock air defences. Presidential spokesperson İbrahim Kalın, who is coordinating the summit, affirmed that security was at its highest level:

“As some 35 or 36 delegations, including the world’s 20 most prominent countries, as well as heads of state, will be at the summit, we don’t see any security weakness.”

As the terror attacks in Paris unfolded, John, Scott and Steve hosted Episode 29 of the Power Line Show. The attacks threw both halves of the show into sharp relief. We started by interviewing Dan Polisar, author of in important article in titled “What Do Palestinians Want?

Polisar reviewed years’ worth of public opinion polling of Palestinians. He found several common themes; a common denominator is a lack of contact with reality. As twisted as Palestinian culture is, what we saw in Paris tonight reflects an even more virulent version of the same ideology.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Aboard the Coast Guard Cutter Taney

 

u045901My father, who died in his seventies back in 1996, served during most of the Second World War aboard the Coast Guard Cutter Taney, now one of the half dozen ships preserved as floating museums in Baltimore Harbor. I only asked him about the War a few times. He just didn’t like to talk about it. He told a few funny stories readily enough — once when the Taney was in port in San Diego, he and a shipmate hopped from the deck onto the dock, then strolled off to spend the day enjoying themselves, but when they returned that evening they found that the tide had come in, lifting the deck far above their heads, and the only way they could get back aboard was by hauling themselves up the ratlines. But talk about combat? The warfare part of the War? All I ever got out of him was a story about Okinawa.

He was on deck one day as an American plane approached a nearby aircraft carrier, preparing to land. Although the Navy issued its pilots frequent new approach patterns, my father explained — they had to make it impossible for the Japanese to use captured American aircraft to stage kamikaze attacks — and this pilot was using the wrong pattern. How my father knew this, I can no longer recall — were all the ships able to listen in to a single radio frequency? — but he described a long several minutes as the entire American fleet seemed to freeze, silent, as the aircraft carrier signaled to the pilot again and again to correct his approach … and finally shot him down. “We never learned what had happened,” my father said, “but you couldn’t get the idea out of your mind that it was one of our guys who just got confused. It made us all sick to our stomachs.”

Taney37_1940_1One story, and that was about it.

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Ian Tuttle of National Review applaud the clear, direct questions in Tuesday’s debate and the substantive discussions that followed. They also cringe as Donald Trump has to be told China is not part of TPP and discuss how Trump and Ben Carson tend to get quiet as the discussions get more detailed. And they slam John Kasich for his belligerent personality and his liberal answers on everything from immigration to bank bailouts.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Best Movie for Today

 

Best_Years_of_Our_Lives_01_barThere’s no shortage of great war movies, but great films about veterans are a rarer breed. About three or four years ago, I was listening to the Ricochet podcast when Rob recommended The Best Years of Our Lives. I knew of it — “That’s the one with the guy who lost his hands, right?” — but had never seen it. I threw it on my Netflix queue and forgot about it for a few weeks before I decided to give it a whirl.

In short, the movie is a damn miracle; even more so, I’d say, than Casablanca. It went into production less than a year after VJ Day and follows three veterans as they attempt to return to — and, indeed, remake — their civilian lives. Each of their stories could suffice as a character study, but interweaving them as this film does gives one a sense of both how shared the existence of pain and trauma pain was, as well as how very much it varied in its particulars.

The acting and direction are first rate throughout. Dana Andrews, in particular, is excellent as a former bombardier who realizes that the war — for all its horror — may well be the high-point of his life, and sure beats working as a soda jerk and returning every night to a wife who’s clearly lost all interest in him. Myrna Loy’s performance is also remarkable and seems to, at least in a little way, to be a bit of a commentary on The Thin Man series’s attitude toward drink.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. From Generation to Generation, Semper Fidelis

 

WWIn 2009, my wife was invited to a function in Washington, DC. Our local library had won a prestigious national award and, as treasurer of one of the library’s most popular community programs, she was asked to attend. When she arrived, she found herself seated at a table with an elderly gentleman in his mid-80’s. Raised on a dairy farm in West Virginia, he had lived quite a life. He had worked odd jobs and drove both trucks and a taxi for a living before he joined the Civilian Conservation Corps. He was working on a project through them in Montana on December 7, 1941.

Like most healthy American males, he went to enlist but he was rejected for military service for being too short. By May 1943, with the war dragging on, he was finally accepted into the Reserves of the United States Marine Corps. A little over a year later, this young man would be in combat with the 1st Battalion, 21st Marines on Guam and, in February of 1945, on the island of Iwo Jima.

It was on Iwo that he truly distinguished himself. With advancement stalled by a series of pill boxes built into the black volcanic sand, he became a one-man assault force. Covered by only four riflemen, he fought with a 70-pound flame thrower on his back and took out the enemy positions with fire and explosives. When his fuel tank was empty, he crawled back behind the lines and rearmed. Again and again he did this, for four long hours under withering Japanese fire.

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Ian Tuttle of National Review cheer Ben Carson for calling out the media’s frothing pursuit of his record but also chide Carson for being sloppy with the facts on some key moments in his life. They also shudder as Hillary Clinton suggests she would use the military much like President Obama does but take some solace in knowing she is probably lying. And they slam Yale University for apologizing that students don’t have enough “safe spaces.”

What if Dick Cheney were to participate in the modern-day equivalent of the Frost-Nixon interviews? Now he has, in Cheney One on One: A Candid Conversation with America’s Most Controversial Statesman, by James Rosen of Fox News.

In a 10-minute conversation with The Bookmonger, Rosen describes how he sat with Cheney for 10 hours as they talked about everything from the events of 9-11 to the former veep’s views of the Tea Party. Rosen also offers a unique theory on why Cheney is so disliked by so many liberals.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Hearings that Were More Important than Benghazi

 

Writing in The American Interest, Eliot A. Cohen notes to his chagrin that Hillary Clinton’s appearance before the committee investigating Benghazi eclipsed everything else in the news that day. This is unfortunate, he notes, because on the same day, he took part in another hearing, before the Senate Armed Services Committee, on Capital Hill.

“Vanity aside,” he remarks, “I wish that my hearing had received a bit more attention.” My vanity isn’t at issue here, but I too wish that his hearing had received more attention.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Fortress America and Mischief Reef

 

reu_mischief_southchinasea_tor4231_53184145A few more thoughts on the Fortress America approach to foreign policy and what might happen if we bring the troops home tomorrow. Today we’ve got a great case study, because the much-anticipated looming showdown in the South China Sea began this morning. (Spoiler alert: Nothing happened.)

You’ll recall that of late China has been building artificial islands in the South China Sea, positioning artillery, talking about expanding its air-defense zone to cover it, and warning US military planes to leave the area. It’s been building up its navy and reconfiguring missiles to hold multiple nuclear warheads. Their approach to asserting their territorial claims has been called a salami-slicing strategy — they take incremental actions, none of which, by themselves, would be a casus belli, but which are designed in total gradually to change the status quo in their favor. Were they to succeed, they’d set a precedent for overturning the principle of freedom of the seas: Significant portions of the seas would in time be appropriated as national territory, overthrowing hundreds of years of international legal tradition and significantly changing the international regime on sovereignty over the oceans’ surface.

Chinese domination over this sea region would upend the security structure of the Asia-Pacific region and greatly complicate the ability of the United States to intervene militarily in a crisis or conflict between China and Taiwan, for example, or to fulfill its obligations under its defense treaties with Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines. This would in turn prompt those countries to reexamine their own defense programs. Before you say, Great, about time they start paying for their own defense, well, first, they do pay for it; but second, it’s really worth reflecting upon that old conservative principle: Don’t tear down a fence until you know why someone built it.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Go On, Ivan: Cut the Cables

 

Headlining in The New York Times today is the revelation that Russian submarines and spy ships are freaking out our defense officials by nosing about the underseas cables that carry the entire information age:

Russian submarines and spy ships are aggressively operating near the vital undersea cables that carry almost all global Internet communications, raising concerns among some American military and intelligence officials that the Russians might be planning to attack those lines in times of tension or conflict. …

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. An Autarky Thought Experiment

 

In response to my post about refugee bonds, the Great Ghost of Gödel left this comment obiter dicta:

Not without trepidation or regret have I come around to the Fortress America position, but here I am. Bring all of our troops stationed overseas home. Defend our borders without mercy. If the rest of the world is hell bent for leather on destroying itself, whether rapidly with open war or slowly with insane economics and/or immigration policy, so what? We’re perfectly capable of being self-sufficient as a nation, and it never was a good idea to be the world’s police. …

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Around the World in Three Minutes

 

hell-in-a-handbasket-the-decline-of-taboos-SGood morning, ladies and gentlemen of Ricochet! I thought I’d take you on a whirlwind tour of the international news to get your day off to an invigorating start.

Now that Russia’s rearranged the chessboard in Middle East, Russia’s propaganda organs have gone into hyperdrive. All of its international state media organs, from Russia Today and TASS to Sputnik, are screaming so shrilly about the West’s weakness and duplicity that I fear the Internet here in Europe’s going to shatter. What’s particularly galling is their ability to find so many Americans who are so eager to shill for them. Paul Craig Roberts (who by the way served in the Reagan Administration) is cheerfully calling for Americans to be wiped out before they destroy the world:

As readers know, I have emphasized that the declared neoconservative intention of achieving global hegemony has resurrected the threat of nuclear armageddon as Russia and China are most definitely not going to submit, as every European country, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Columbia, and Japan have submitted,to being Washington’s vassals.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Benghazi Committee Wrap-up

 

This is a preview from Friday morning’s The Daily Shot newsletter. Subscribe here.

TDS-Logo-BYesterday, Hillary Clinton testified before the House Select Committee on Benghazi. She began around 10 AM and testified for more than 11 hours. (Luckily for Clinton, she had prepared ahead of time by drinking the blood of a thousand innocents.) As the hearing began, Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy let everybody know that Clinton had already been sworn in behind closed doors (meaning that there would be no memorable low-angle photos of Clinton with her hand raised) and also that if anybody needed one, “we can take a break for any reason or no reason. If you or anyone alerts me, we can take a break for any reason or for no reason.”

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Women in Combat

 

The subject of women serving in combat roles has come up several times here in Ricoland. Here I started a conversation about Son #1, who spent a year training women for USMC Infantry and collected data, and the way the Secretary of the Navy is now impugning that data.

This week, I ran into an acquaintance whose daughter went to West Point. She was recruited thanks to her soccer skills. She did two years of military school prep before starting West Point, and had to avail herself of every tutoring opportunity available there.

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review are glad to see the FBI being diligent about it’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s server despite political pressure to conclude there’s nothing there. They also shudder as former Defense Secretary Robert Gates says Pres. Obama is paranoid about military leaders trying to force his hand. And they react the media abruptly ending its fawning over a Joe Biden candidacy after Hillary survives first debate.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. War Is Heck

 

Remember the study that concluded that female Marines were slower, less accurate with weapons and more injury-prone than men? The one that concluded that all-male units were faster and more lethal than mixed-gender units on most combat tasks? The one that came as a surprise to exactly no one who’s actually looked at a man’s upper body and a woman’s and thought, “Vive la différence?

Well, not to worry. Turns out that morale in these mixed-gender units is perfectly satisfactory. Just as good as in the all-male groups, reports The New York Times with evident delight:

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review give credit to President Obama for postponing troop removal from Afghanistan as stability erodes there. They also slam Secretary of State John Kerry for suggesting a week of imam-inspired stabbings of Jews in Israel is a result of Israel building settlements on the West Bank. And they scratch their heads over Ben Carson’s decision to put his campaign on hold for two weeks to promote his new book.

They’re both here! Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review enjoy reading how Hillary Clinton’s closest supporters think she’s a mediocre candidate who repeats the same mistakes and wasn’t ready for the 2016 campaign. They also slam the Jeb Bush volunteer who confronted Donald Trump on Monday with left-wing talking points and note how Trump sullied a good response with another Twitter attack. And they unload on the U.S. official in Russia who responded to the Dutch conclusion that a Russian-made missile destroyed a commercial airliner last year by saying there was too much focus on assigning blame.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Vladimir Putin, the Strong Horse

 

horse_1456083iOsama Bin Laden said, “When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, they will naturally want to side with the strong horse.” Understanding that fact of human nature and geopolitics, Vladimir Putin galloped into Syria to show the Middle East that Russia rides high while the US flees from the world stage.

While President Obama busies himself making silly faces toward a selfie stick, many beleaguered residents of Syria and Iraq are more than happy to welcome a new sheriff to town.

Amid the ornate walls of Damascus’ famed Omayyad Mosque, preacher Maamoun Rahmeh stood before worshippers last week, declaring Russian President Vladimir Putin a “giant and beloved leader” who has “destroyed the myth of the self-aggrandizing America.”