Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. The NSA: Not as Smart as They Think They Are …

 

JuniperLast week, I posted a link to an article about the breach at Juniper Networks — and said it was bad news.

Today, Wired released an article that describes in great detail how the breach affected Juniper’s network gear. For the layfolks in the room, let me summarize the nature of the breach. Then I’ll point out how this breach was caused, probably intentionally, by the NSA, and how the NSA has, in this case, made us all more vulnerable.

To understand the breach, you need to first have a rudimentary understanding of how a virtual private network, or VPN, works. Anyone who works for a company and connects remotely to their company’s network will have heard the term. A VPN is a private network that uses a public network (usually the Internet) to connect remote sites or users. A VPN creates a “tunnel” through the Internet between two points — usually a laptop and a company firewall. Or the two points may be two firewalls, one at the corporate headquarters, the other at a remote branch. The data that flows through this tunnel is encrypted by the VPN software at one end, then decrypted at the other. Theoretically, while the data is in transit, it’s safe from prying eyes. While the process for encrypting data is generally complex, the idea is quite simple. The software simply runs the data through a set of instructions (known as an algorithm) that scramble it all up like an egg. It does this based upon an encryption key. So long as the other end has the same key, and the same algorithm for encryption, it can basically reverse the steps and unscramble the data.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Show Me the War: That Will End ISIS Money

 

Militant Islamist fighter waving a flag, cheers as he takes part in a military parade along the streets of Syria's northern Raqqa provinceBy all accounts, ISIS is the wealthiest terrorist organization in the world. By far. In round numbers, ISIS is said to have a $2 billion stash, which is keeping it afloat. Most of it comes from oil sales. Much of it comes from plundered banking funds. And the rest of it comes from taxing locals, selling stolen antiquities, and kidnapping ransoms.

The big question is, what are we — the United States — doing about it?

Taking away the money would go a long way toward winning the war. But thus far our record is lousy.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. A Carnival of Buncombe

 

At least since the birth of Ricochet, I’ve been dismayed that our election debates treat foreign policy and national security as an afterthought, at best. I well remember the final 2012 presidential debate, which was supposed to be the foreign policy debate, and the way the candidates couldn’t wait to stop talking about it and return to domestic policy.

By the way, pop quiz: Don’t look. Who said the following?

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Ride Into The No-Fly Zone

 

Syria was a key focus of the Republican national security debate. The merits of establishing a no-fly zone over Syria were hot topics in the debate and here on Ricochet. Since the early 1990s, the concept of a no-fly zone has achieved an almost mythical status; people perceive such a zone as an effective way to influence conflicts and regional politics.

I am a veteran of 76 missions, between 1995 and 1998, to enforce the UN-sanctioned no-fly zone over southern Iraq known as Operation Southern Watch (OSW). During multiple deployments, I flew F-14As with the US Navy from USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72, and F-16CJs with the US Air Force from several known and other expeditionary airfields in the region.

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review applaud Gen. Robert Abrams for ordering a general court martial for Bowe Bergdahl on charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. They also groan as the Obama administration refuses to bomb ISIS propaganda centers due to the fear of civilian casualties. And they unload on a columnist for the UK Independent for suggesting the West establish diplomatic relations with ISIS to contain its aggression.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Accounts of Afghanistan

 

A few months ago, someone started a thread on Reddit with the question, Soldiers of Reddit who’ve fought in Afghanistan, what preconceptions did you have that turned out to be completely wrong?

I found the answers fascinating. I couldn’t stop reading them.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Is America an Indispensable Nation?

 

In 1998, Madeleine Albright described the United States as “the indispensable nation.” In 2014, Micah Zenko denounced this claim as a myth. A year later, Xenia Wickett argued that Albright was right. “The fact remains,” she writes,

that, today, the US is indispensable – a necessary, if not sufficient actor in addressing the world’s biggest challenges.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Why Isn’t This The Only Thing Anyone’s Talking About?

 

The New York Times reported this on Saturday:

KABUL, Afghanistan — Alarmed that large stretches of Helmand Province are falling to the Taliban, American Special Operations forces have secretly taken a more central role in the fighting to save crucial areas of the province, as more air power and ground troops have been committed to the battle, according to Western and Afghan officials.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. What’s Still Great About Sports

 

PHILADELPHIA - DECEMBER 8: The offensive line of the Army Black Knights gets set to snap the ball during a game against the Army Black Knights on December 8, 2012 at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Navy won 17-13. (Photo by Hunter Martin/Getty Images)

A contemporary sports fan with a brain surveys the pro and college sports landscapes and is forced to consider, “is this really worth my time, money, and energy?”

Astronomical salaries, lunatic agents, endless analysis, coaches who think they’re Patton, and fans who feel every blown call is a grounds for an appeal to the Supreme Court — it all takes its toll.

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review applaud Marco Rubio for slipping language into a recent spending bill that makes it much tougher for the government to bail out health insurers, which may provide an opportunity soon to change the system. They also discuss a newly released email suggesting the Pentagon did have a military response ready to deploy to the Benghazi attacks. And they shake their heads as Bernie Sanders ducks questions on ISIS.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. The Battle of Ramadi

 

It’s obviously hard to know from here what’s in fact happening in Ramadi, but the Iraqi government claims that Iraqi joint forces have recaptured the Anbar operations command and large parts of Ramadi from ISIS. The Reuters account of this is probably the best reporting we’ll get. It’s clear that for those trapped there, it is a horror:

As Iraqi forces close in on the western city of Ramadi, thousands of civilians are effectively being held hostage inside by Islamic State militants who want to use them as human shields. …

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. How About We Bomb the Undersea Cables?

 

I’m thinking about Tom Bethell’s comment:

But our military seems to be organized to deal with the Hitler scenario rather than the Islamist threat. Germans took orders, Islamist terrorists are self starters.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. At Least the Nazis Took Orders

 

An observation by the journalist Tom Bethell, an old friend:

It seems the problem with the radical Islamists is that they cannot be identified ahead of time. Another way of putting it is to say that they do not have a leader who tells them what to do. Home grown terrorists can read about terror incidents in the media and figure it out on their own. In contrast, if Hitler had been assassinated in (say) 1939, World War II may well have been stopped right then. But our military seems to be organized to deal with the Hitler scenario rather than the Islamist threat. Germans took orders, Islamist terrorists are self starters.

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review give Obama credit for finally admitting that Ft. Hood and Chattanooga were terrorist attacks and for saying Muslims have a responsibility to denounce radical ideology. They also sigh as Obama offers the same ineffective prescription for defeating ISIS and says we’ll win because we’re on the right side of history. And they groan as the father of terrorist Syed Farook says his son told him he agreed with the ISIS ideology of establishing a global caliphate.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Endorsement for the Use of Military Force

 

The president’s address last night was better than I expected. He talked defensibly about Islamism, which I’ll take a vast improvement over his administration’s policy of describing Islamism as merely one form among many of “violent extremism” and undermining all credulity by arguing that the Islamic State is in no way, shape, or form related to Islam.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Remembering the USS Arizona

 

The sinking of the USS Arizona means a great deal to Arizonans, especially to those of us who had the honor of serving at Pearl Harbor. There are many memorials on base commemorating the Japanese attack but none so moving as the USS Arizona Memorial, which was dedicated 20 years after the event.

One of the bells from the Pennsylvania-class battleship hangs at the University of Arizona in Tucson. On Sunday, a survivor from the attack was there to ring the bell in memory of those many men lost 74 years ago. Ruben Moreno, bandleader of the brilliant Mariachi Luz de Luna, played taps as 94-year-old Lauren Bruner honored his fallen shipmates.

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review applaud Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for being a fearless voice against her own party on the issue of national security. They also rip United Health for just now realizing that Obamacare is a disaster for their bottom line. And they groan as Hillary uses little girls in an ad to pitch the need for a female president.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Yesterday Would Have Been Better, But Now’s Fine

 

The most basic duties of a nation state are to protect its citizens from foreign violence and — when failing at that — to ensure that those who commit violence against it are seen to have made a grievous mistake.

For fourteen months, the Islamic State been allowed to get away with humiliating a military we spent over a decade — and countless billions — training. It has, moreover, done so despite our government’s explicit promise to defeat it, while encouraging and orchestrating domestic violence in the West. As noted in this morning’s Morning Jolt, it’s been a lot more success than failure of late, and there are dead Americans on three continents to prove it.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. If We Want to Destroy ISIS, We Can Destroy ISIS

 

140929-afghanistan-chinook-ga-1810_58a400ee3e3c26a5fdf0a7c395ac8d34If we want to destroy ISIS, we can destroy ISIS. Perhaps I am stating the obvious, but I want to state it anyway. Why? Because I am not hearing it enough.

I’m certainly not hearing it from the White House, where the original goal of destruction is barely mentioned. President Obama is listless. He’s also petulant, pointing political fingers at Republicans. But he doesn’t have a trace of a coherent policy to destroy ISIS. Not a trace.

This is from General Jack Keane, in his recent congressional testimony: “Having the best security defensive system in America is not sufficient; we must have as good an offense to stop and defeat ISIS. We do not. We are not even close.”

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Obama and the Office of the Petulancy

 

Barack ObamaIt’s difficult to overstate how poorly Barack Obama performed at Monday’s press conference from the G20 summit in Antalya, Turkey. As France deals with the aftermath of an ISIS attack leaving 132 dead (so far), hundreds wounded, and thousands of lives shattered, the ersatz leader of the free world responded with an embarrassing display of indifference, peevishness, and open contempt. He was less “President Obama” and more “Petulant Obama.”

As reporters lobbed obvious questions about Obama’s dismissive description of ISIS as a JV team, his broken promise to degrade and destroy the group, and the massive intelligence failure that rocked Europe, he seemed annoyed at all the fuss.

“There will be setbacks and there will be successes,” Obama said calmly. “The terrible events in Paris were a terrible and sickening setback.”