Member Post

 

Back in 2010, Democrats voted to nationalize one sixth of our economy and called it Obamacare. Many, like myself, were against it, not because we are racist, selfish or greedy, but because we have learned that all mandatory government programs stifle freedom, are over-priced, and are rife with unintended consequence. In its brief life, Obamacare […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America react to the IRS reportedly ignoring whether taxpayers failed to purchase health insurance in 2016. They also discuss the latest revelations surrounding Mike Flynn and the leaking to the media by career national security personnel. And they discuss the early speculation that Kid Rock may be recruited to run for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

Member Post

 

I figured it wouldn’t hurt to ask – I live in Tennessee, east of Nashville and east of Gallatin. Anybody recommend an internist out this way? One that knows how to interact with people would be my preference. Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America are thrilled to see Tom Price confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services. They also discuss the numerous problems with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on the Trump immigration order. And they slam CNN’s Chris Cuomo for asserting that accusing a journalist of fake news is the equivalent of using the N word.

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America have all bad news, starting with a federal judge putting a hold on Pres. Trump’s immigration order without citing any law or constitutional provision and Trump’s subsequent tweets attacking the judicial system. We also blast Trump for his moral equivalence in dismissing Vladimir Putin as a killer by saying America’s done a lot of bad things too. And we discuss and debate whether the slower GOP strategy on Obamacare and tax reform is responsible leadership or letting a golden opportunity slip away.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. What Are We Going to Do When Republicans Don’t Repeal Obamacare?

 

First, some history. Before 2010, Republicans said, “We can’t do anything as a minority party, but give us the House, and we’ll repeal Obamacare.” After 2010, Republicans said, “We only have the House, we can’t do anything. GIve us the Senate, and we’ll repeal Obamacare.” After 2014, Republicans said, “We can’t repeal Obamacare with just the House and Senate, we need the White House.”

Now, it’s 2017. Republicans have both houses of Congress and the White House. And now they are saying, “We can’t possibly repeal Obamacare, but maybe we can fix it.”

Member Post

 

Feel free to leave suggestions, thoughts and surgical recommendations in the comments. Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Getting Through to the Left: A Story of Success

 

I have a friend, a dear and kind man. He’s not an intellectual, neither atheist nor agnostic; in fact, I’m sure he does not even know what an agnostic is. (I’m not sure I do either, except that I think I’m one.) He’s Christian and accomplished, but not highly educated. He’s hardcore blue collar, the son of a farmer. Yet despite all this, he’s of the Left. It seems incongruous, but that’s what he is. He doesn’t hate conservatives, he just believes that the Left shows a more empathetic way; a kinder way. In his world, life is hard, and harder for some than for others. Government, to him, seems the best and most efficient way to soften life’s edges and help those who have it tough. To him, that is progress. Republicans impede that progression in his view: they oppose funding; they oppose welfare programs; they oppose everything. In his mind, it’s always about money for the Right. Dirty pieces of paper with pictures of dead men on them.

So, this morning, I was relaying the fact that I had promised a second essay for Ricochet on health care reform. I explained how I struggled to put my thoughts together, having earlier tweaked my back. Vicodin was clouding my mind, but I got it done. He asked about the details and I gave him my “unleashing the uncanny ability of American consumers to find a bargain” speech. He was following the logic when he stopped me, and asked “Why don’t we just nationalize health care? They do it in Canada, and in Britain. People say it’s great.”

I answered thus:

Member Post

 

Essay 1: Broke and Broken – Healthcare in America 2017 Essay 2: Health Care and Insurance Reform: a Blueprint Preview Open

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Member Post

 

CANADA, January 26, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – A pair of Canadian researchers have published a cost-benefit analysis predicting that euthanasia and assisted suicide will save Canadian taxpayers as much as $139 million a year. Critics say the study provides the bridge needed by governments to pressure the elderly into believing it is their ‘duty to die’ […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Get It Together, Senators

 

Good news: Republican members of the US Senate are excited to repeal and replace ObamaCare. Bad news: Even at this late date, they can’t decide on how to do so.

Via the WSJ, one plan comes from Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA), who describe it as an “an off-ramp” for the GOP and, likely, amenable enough to Democrats to overcome a filibuster:

The bill would take major decisions out of the hands of Congress and let states choose whether to keep the current law’s core insurance structure, with the promise that if a state opts out it will get the federal funding it would have received to enact its own ideas instead. […] The senators’ proposal, called The Patient Freedom Act of 2017, would effectively allow states to opt out of many of the provisions that form Title I of the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, including the requirement that everyone must obtain health coverage or pay a penalty and an edict that insurers cannot charge older people significantly more than younger people.

Member Post

 

The key operative word in the title is “permanently.” Don’t tell me it makes no difference which party is in office. We have the votes and we have the President to sign it. If the election had swung the other way, both for Congress and the Presidency, Hillary might be signing a repeal of the […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America applaud the vast majority of President Trump’s executive orders. They also groan at the news President Obama defied Congress to send $221 million to the Palestinian Authority on his final morning as president. And they shake their heads as two-thirds of Senate Democrats even oppose Mike Pompeo to lead the CIA.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Fix, Repeal & Replace… Who Cares?

 

There’s a lot in the mainstream (i.e. left-wing) press these days advocating that ObamaCare be “fixed” rather than “repealed and replaced.” I think it’s worth noting that it doesn’t make a dime’s worth of difference — to anybody’s health — which we do. Hear me out.

Fact 1: ObamaCare was built on the assumption that you could build a workable risk pool that could be insured across-the-board with decent insurance at a tolerable price if you used a mandate to force everyone to participate, and backed up that mandate with a penalty (if you’re Barack Obama) or tax (if you’re John Roberts).

Fact 2: For whatever reason, that assumption has was mistaken, even with the carrot of subsidies available for a lot of the young and healthy (and, presumably, those with low incomes). Too few of them have signed-up and the risk pool is both older and sicker than Democrats had hoped.

Promoted from the Ricochet Member Feed by Editors Created with Sketch. Reminder: A Gaffe is When a Politician Accidentally Tells the Truth

 

From Rep. Tom Price’s confirmation hearing, via Reason:

Member Post

 

With Trump’s Inauguration up front, and his remarkable campaign behind, here’s a recent conversation I had on the relationship between male sexual function, confidence, and energy, with Dr. John Crisler, a leading practitioner in the field of testosterone replacement therapy. At 58, Dr. Crisler credits “perfectly tuned” hormones for helping him retain his remarkable physical […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

In the final podcast of the Obama presidency, Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America cheer Donald Trump’s goal of aggressively reducing the size of government but acknowledge it will not be easy. They also react to Bernie Sanders saying America is not compassionate because our government does not do as much for people as more liberal governments do. And they scratch their heads as Rep. Tulsi Gabbard embarks on a mysterious trip to Syria.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. On Collectivized Medical Progress

 

When it comes to fixing our healthcare system, there are several fundamental disconnects between progressivism and conservatism. One of these, perhaps the main one, relates to the advisability of collectivizing healthcare expenditures via taxpayer subsidization and debt accumulation. Conservatives tend to view the collectivization of healthcare financing as the root of the problem; whereas progressives tend to view it as the answer to the problem. (Obviously, for this to be true, among other things conservatives and progressives must be defining “the problem” differently.)

As a conservative I hold to the view that any real fix of our healthcare mess is going to require individuals to take on much more of the financial responsibility for their own health, and that doing so is both morally desirable and fiscally mandatory. I also believe it is going to be extraordinarily difficult to get a substantial proportion of the American public to accept personal responsibility for something that, they have been convinced, is and ought to be a right. I think most of us here understand how difficult that will be. But as we formulate our arguments in this regard, we are obligated to take a sober look at another major issue we face as we fight to individualize healthcare expenditures. It is an issue which, I fear, judging from the content of the debate, has not yet occurred to many of us.

Member Post

 

A friend of mine is very concerned about what is going to be the alternative to Obamacare. He works with a number of freelance photographers whose salary are under $18000 per annum and are currently covered by Obamacare. They are wondering what they must do ? What programs are on the table that would provide […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.