Judge Silberman on the Right to Bear Arms

 

Now that Tommy’s got us going at it–see his post below–I thought folks here at Ricochet might enjoy this excerpt from my Uncommon Knowledge interview with Judge Laurence Silberman.  Judge Silberman wrote the decision declaring unconstitutional the District of Columbia’s handgun ban–and reopening serious debate over the right to bear arms.

This excerpt lasts just five minutes, but Judge Silberman sketches out all the main issues.  (He’s just wonderfully succinct and engaging.)

Join Ricochet!
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s growing community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Members have made 6 comments.

  1. Profile photo of The Mugwump Inactive

    The Founding Fathers might have written the Second Amendment as follows: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the Militia to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” They were lawyers after all. The right is specifically reserved to the People. Case closed.

    • #1
    • January 30, 2011 at 2:08 am
  2. Profile photo of Peter Robinson Founder
    Peter Robinson Post author

    Beautifully put.

    • #2
    • January 30, 2011 at 2:17 am
  3. Profile photo of Nickolas Inactive

    I second Peter on that. I never heard that argument before. I’ll add it to my arsenal.

    • #3
    • January 30, 2011 at 2:59 am
  4. Profile photo of fullfrontal Inactive

    That part is easy, but like the other thread asks: Is this right unlimited? If not, then how will we decide such limits?

    • #4
    • January 30, 2011 at 3:11 am
  5. Profile photo of Kervinlee Member
    ~Paules: The Founding Fathers might have written the Second Amendment as follows: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the Militia to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” They were lawyers after all. The right is specifically reserved to the People. Case closed. · Jan 29 at 1:08pm

    Every right in the Bill of Rights are endowed and exercised by individuals. There is no such thing as a right to be execised only by a collective group as I understand it.

    The gun-grabbers militia-only rights argument fails on that test. Every individual is the militia. Sovereign, too.

    • #5
    • January 30, 2011 at 3:56 am
  6. Profile photo of Robert Bennett Inactive

    Peter, I would like to request a post from you on the origins of UK and how it got started. I only started watching maybe 3-4 years ago.

    • #6
    • January 30, 2011 at 5:00 am