Quote of the Day: Father Brown on Skepticism

 

‘It’s what I call common sense, properly understood,’ replied Father Brown. ’It really is more natural to believe a preternatural story, that deals with things we don’t understand, than a natural story that contradicts things we do understand. Tell me that the great Mr Gladstone, in his last hours, was haunted by the ghost of Parnell, and I will be agnostic about it. But tell me that Mr Gladstone, when first presented to Queen Victoria, wore his hat in her drawing-room and slapped her on the back and offered her a cigar, and I am not agnostic at all. That is not impossible; it’s only incredible. But I’m much more certain it didn’t happen than that Parnell’s ghost didn’t appear; because it violates the laws of the world I do understand.

Much as I enjoy reading G.K. Chesterton’s Father Brown mysteries, perhaps they’re best taken one at a time. There’s a certain uniformity to them, and I don’t just mean that the murderer never turns out to be Catholic. There are always sound, practical, men of the world who are deceived by some sort of supernatural occurrence, and Father Brown solves the mystery by disbelieving in old curses or modern magicians. While allowing for the vagaries of fiction there are things well worth learning in those stories.

When a man presents to me a funny idea I find that I’m often able to grasp the essentials and dismiss it because of what I already know. If you were to try and sell me a perpetual motion machine then I’d mark you down as a con man right away. Not because I’ve sussed out the particular con you’re using, but because I know enough about energy to know that the con must be in there somewhere.

Let’s say that someone is proposing a plan to optimize our elementary schools. They’ll collect continuous data on the students while they’re learning and feed that data into powerful machine learning engines to plot out an optimized curriculum for each individual student. Lay aside for the moment privacy concerns, it sounds like a neat plan, right? It won’t work. I know a little about data collection and about machine learning so maybe it’s plausible according to the laws of that world. I know enough about the ability of central planners to organize people’s lives from a century of socialism to tell you that, however they optimize this curriculum, it won’t be.

Published in Group Writing
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 5 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. She Member
    She
    @She

    A quote which explains aspects of magical thinking more clearly and succinctly than any other I’ve seen.

    ***

    This is the Quote of the Day. December’s sign-up sheet is here.  Please sign up today!

    If you’re new at this game, it’s a easy way to get your feet wet and start a conversation; if you’re an old-timer, you already know the ropes.  Either way, we’re looking forward to your post.

    Another ongoing project to encourage new voices is our Group Writing Project. December’s theme is “Winter Nights and Dark Winter Nights.”  If you’d like to weigh in, please sign up for Group Writing too!

    • #1
  2. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Great quote. And Great points. 

    • #2
  3. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    Hank,

    Here is my Quote of the Day about your Quote of the Day.

    “Your Quote of the Day is, and I Quote,

    ‘She (View Comment):
    [a] quote which explains aspects of magical thinking more clearly and succinctly than any other I’ve seen.’

    “.

     

    • #3
  4. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    You mean, like, 3 trillion in spending doesn’t equal zero??? Huh. Whodathunk?

    • #4
  5. Qoumidan Coolidge
    Qoumidan
    @Qoumidan

    I’m not sure this is quite the same concept, but it’s a pretty good explanation of my quibble with the movie “Brave”.  The magically turning into bears was quite easily believable, but the end where the entire culture does a massive shift after one 2 minute speech completely destroys the story.  (Not even a moderately decent speech, it was a really dumb speech.)

    • #5
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.