The Biden Administration is Spying on Tucker Carlson

 

The corrupt Biden administration is spying on Americans.

The CIA spied on Congress and John Brennan lied about it. He was not fired. FISA was abused to spy on the Trump campaign. Opponents of the Iran deal were certain that they were being surveilled. One person said on the John Batchelor Show that the Obama administration responded too quickly to their press releases. The Deep State has become the Stasi. We need to throw the bums out in Congress and fire everyone in the top three layers of the FIB, CIA, etc. Let the good ones apply for reinstatement.

Published in Domestic Policy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 84 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Name names and sources, please Tucker. You are held to the same standards as the MSM.

    I think he is trying to corroborate what he was told with a FOIA request . . .

    • #61
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    The latest from Tucker. https://twitter.com/nicedeb/status/1410040949015711746?s=21 NSA issued a non-denial denial.

     

    So they are admitting to having a court order the explicitly authorizes them to target Tucker?

    No, they’re denying it.  They’re not denying that they are collecting his electronic communications, but they are denying he’s an active target of their own investigations.

    This is like saying: Sure I’m taking pictures through your bedroom window, but I’m not looking at them — I’m giving them to Joe, here, to look at.

    • #62
  3. MarciN Member
    MarciN
    @MarciN

    All celebrities are at tremendous risk from publicity-seeking district attorneys and public prosecutors and reporters who stand to make a small fortune from watching and waiting for those celebrities to slip up in any tiny way.

    • #63
  4. MarciN Member
    MarciN
    @MarciN

    I get a kick out of the idea that the NSA or other agencies are not watching Tucker’s every move. They are watching all of us constantly, including Tucker. 

    • #64
  5. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    The latest from Tucker. https://twitter.com/nicedeb/status/1410040949015711746?s=21 NSA issued a non-denial denial.

    –So basically they have FISA warrant, which we know has been thoroughly corrupted. What was the AG’s report an average of 20 errors per file, the highest being 67 errors?

    They want to target X but can’t justify it. So they target Y who is a friend of X. They get all communications with Y which includes X. So they get everything from X but can truthfully say he’s not a target. See how easy it is.

    • #65
  6. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    The latest from Tucker. https://twitter.com/nicedeb/status/1410040949015711746?s=21 NSA issued a non-denial denial.

     

    So they are admitting to having a court order the explicitly authorizes them to target Tucker?

    They may well have. I hear that those FISA clowns are easy.

    • #66
  7. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Our intellectual betters.

    And

    How would Jonah know that. Andy McCarthy was constantly surprised at how thoroughly the FISA process was corrupted. The Mueller investigation was another example of a situation where they quickly knew there was no Russian collusion and used it as a weapon to attack Trump supporters. America today has a Stasi like process where the losers persecute the winners if they’re Republicans.

    Andy McCarthy has been thoroughly discredited; he is either incredibly gullible, or corrupt.

    I disagree more or less but don’t really feel like arguing about it. McCarthy has his areas of knowledge and areas that he should avoid. There is no one on this site who has a greater depth of knowledge on the operations of federal criminal prosecutions than McCarthy. Impeachment, not so much.

    –Actually McCarthy is pretty much out of touch with modern processes. Like so many of the talking heads, he hasnt been in an actual courtroom in decades.

    Things don’t change much and I’m sure he retains sources.

    –I prefer to get my legal information from actual trial lawyers, like Kurt Schlicter, Robert Barnes and our own @ arizonapatriot.

    This is wholly dependent on area of practice.  Being an “actual trial lawyer” in one area does not necessarily indicate knowledge in another area.  I’m rather sure one of our more famous (notorious?) members tries cases.

    • #67
  8. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Flicker (View Comment):
    This is like saying: Sure I’m taking pictures through your bedroom window, but I’m not looking at them — I’m giving them to Joe, here, to look at.

    Whenever you see a response carefully parsed so whoever said or wrote it has a tiny legal escape hatch should they be put under oath, you know they are deliberately giving a mistaken impression on the subject, which is as good as lying . . .

    • #68
  9. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Stad (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    This is like saying: Sure I’m taking pictures through your bedroom window, but I’m not looking at them — I’m giving them to Joe, here, to look at.

    Whenever you see a response carefully parsed so whoever said or wrote it has a tiny legal escape hatch should they be put under oath, you know they are deliberately giving a mistaken impression on the subject, which is as good as lying . . .

    If I was ever aware of anything directly related to your comment above, I don’t have any recollection of it at this time.

    • #69
  10. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    The latest from Tucker. https://twitter.com/nicedeb/status/1410040949015711746?s=21 NSA issued a non-denial denial.

    –So basically they have FISA warrant, which we know has been thoroughly corrupted. What was the AG’s report an average of 20 errors per file, the highest being 67 errors?

    They want to target X but can’t justify it. So they target Y who is a friend of X. They get all communications with Y which includes X. So they get everything from X but can truthfully say he’s not a target. See how easy it is.

    Like they did with Trump.

    • #70
  11. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Stad (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    This is like saying: Sure I’m taking pictures through your bedroom window, but I’m not looking at them — I’m giving them to Joe, here, to look at.

    Whenever you see a response carefully parsed so whoever said or wrote it has a tiny legal escape hatch should they be put under oath, you know they are deliberately giving a mistaken impression on the subject, which is as good as lying . . .

    This is so.  IMO, it’s more corroborative than anything else.

    • #71
  12. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

     

    • #72
  13. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Here’s more from Tucker about this. The NSA is leaking his emails to journalists.

    Note that the original source told Tucker details about his private emails.

    • #73
  14. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    This is likely true. Even if it wasn’t, I have no problem with people spreading such stories. Until the Feds clean up their act and punish the guilty, they deserve suspicion.

    • #74
  15. Boss Mongo Member
    Boss Mongo
    @BossMongo

    EHerring (View Comment):
    Until the Feds clean up their act and punish the guilty…

    You romantic dreamer, you.

    • #75
  16. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Boss Mongo (View Comment):

    EHerring (View Comment):
    Until the Feds clean up their act and punish the guilty…

    You romantic dreamer, you.

    Right. They merit suspicion merely by being the government.

    I don’t think that I much like the FBI writing their interview reports after the fact by memory. If body cams are good enough for beat cops, they’re good enough for you, especially since “lying” to you is a federal offense. Does that cramp your style? Cry me a river.

    • #76
  17. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    EHerring (View Comment):

    This is likely true. Even if it wasn’t, I have no problem with people spreading such stories. Until the Feds clean up their act and punish the guilty, they deserve suspicion.

    Nah.  Shut them down.  They’ve proven themselves corrupt over the past five years, and we’re better off with none than with the current corrupt versions.  Let the military keep their intelligence services, and keep the (In)Justice Department and the Marshals.  FBI, CIA, NSA…  shut them the [CoC] down.

    • #77
  18. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Yet more Tucker https://twitter.com/tpostmillennial/status/1412931676359991302?s=21

    • #78
  19. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Our intellectual betters.

    And

    Two more people who won’t be on my genius list.
    https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1412905574564515841?s=21

    • #79
  20. DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) Coolidge
    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!)
    @DonG

    My heart was broken, when I read this news about how Biden’s NSA is targeting American journalists. 

    • #80
  21. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    My heart was broken, when I read this news about how Biden’s NSA is targeting American journalists.

    Only the wrong-thinking ones.

    • #81
  22. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    My heart was broken, when I read this news about how Biden’s NSA is targeting American journalists.

    That makes one of you, LOL.

    Not that the people who cast shade on the OP will ever admit it. 

    • #82
  23. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    kedavis (View Comment):

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    My heart was broken, when I read this news about how Biden’s NSA is targeting American journalists.

    Only the wrong-thinking ones.

    Oh, they are targeting the others as well, they just haven’t seen the need to leak information about sycophant hacks.

    • #83
  24. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    My heart was broken, when I read this news about how Biden’s NSA is targeting American journalists.

    I take it this in reference to a certain useful idiot/quisling?

     

    • #84
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.