Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Mollie Is Taking on the 2020 Election
I saw today that Mollie Hemingway is writing a book on the 2020 election. I can’t wait to give her my money. Because I know she’ll say the things that I want her to say? No. That’s not Mollie. Or me. I want to give her my money for this because 1) The reporting and handling of all of this has been dangerously propagandistic, and 2) after years of interacting with Mollie and seeing her approach, she is exactly the right person to investigate even if no one else will.
She asks the right questions. She doesn’t accept the answers if they don’t make sense. She keeps pulling on the thread while everyone else seems intent on denying that any threads exist at all. Who knows where it will lead? I can guess, but I can also accept being wrong about my guess.
Good luck Mollie! I hope you get the access you’ll need and I hope you thoroughly pull all the threads until we get to the truth.
Published in General
I’m with you, Ed! She’s one of my favorite reporters and tells the truth. Can’t wait for the book!
Justice on Trial was outstanding. Based on that, I’ll probably be spending a few bucks on her new book when it comes out.
Real investigative reporting. Need more of that for 2020.
Publication date is Sept. 21. Looking forward to it.
I have been instructed that she’s now a “pod person.”
Sad. I was looking forward to this book. But because she’s now a “pod person” (according to people who claim that the 2020 elections were the most secure ever), I guess I’ll pass.
/sarc
Go Mollie!
I miss Mollie.
I miss Troy too!
Heh, yup she’s the one in the pod. Yup. /sarc
Mollie first earned my respect in the SSM wars from several years ago. She was able to follow competing arguments and threads, and she was able to figure out when a combatant was sincerely dealing with the cutting edge of the disagreement or was veering off into any number of logical fallacies or human weaknesses derailing the argument. She kept that approach and still has it as far as I can tell (one of the few who does have that approach). It served her and us when Russia Collusion Hoax came up and any number of the shocking hoaxes and propaganda that have come to pass since 2015.
Hmm… well, if it’s true that history is written by the victors…
(I’m joking. History is, of course, written by history writers.)
Bryan I still miss The Hemingways podcast (and the Fight of the Week).
It seems a little premature since there is still so much out there. I’d prefer it if the quality journalists were out there gathering data and reporting on it as it comes instead rushing to a conclusion after less than a year. Historians know that these things take years if not decades to figure out. There are still a lot of threads being pulled. To sit down and write it all out now means that she’s finished her research and that it doesn’t include things we’re still waiting to see about, like all of the Dominion lawsuits, the forensic audits, and the pending legal challenges.
Could be premature. It’s not out – she’s writing now. Will be doing more research and interviews. Sounds like it’s still in progress.
The Durham Report model?
Would her book be promoted to the main feed?
Yes, the Victors.
The Durham Report involves critical actions taken as long as five years ago, or more. Not premature.
Bada Bing!
I thought it just was.
In order to publish it in September it will need to be done soon so they can start the editing process. Publishers also want to market it at least three to six months in advance. Being as that she has many friends among the Ricochet editors I’ll be surprised if some of them won’t be getting an advanced copy for review pretty soon.
Just tardy.
I don’t doubt Mollie’s determination etc, but as a… “statistical civilian?”… I’m not sure if she can be relied on to figure out if someone is attempting a hoodwink in that area, etc. or if she’d be too willing to accept that some justification is valid without digging further.
We’ll see. I assume she’ll interview all kinds of people in order to avoid obvious blind spots like all those who still parrot the Fine People Hoax. I want truth, not confirmation and not willful coverup.
I know! Check out the guns on that dude!
Oh, wait. You meant the other Troy.
My bad.
Victor Davis Hanson?
Edit: I am late to the VDH comedy party.
I don’t think there would be any willful coverup from Mollie, my concern is that she might not be able to spot it from others.
Dominion has been levying billion dollar lawsuits on anyone questioning the integrity of their machines. So I doubt her publisher would want to risk writing anything that might invite another. It’s a safe bet then that she’s not likely to cover the questions over electronic fraud allegations more that to just say they exist. That’s why I feel this is topic needs to play out for a while longer.
And if electronic fraud turns out to be the core of it all, that means her book won’t be very useful.
It’s led me this far. I used to annoy people around here by saying the opposite.
But . . . threads.
This is what Trump and the GOP should be talking about. This doesn’t include the Democrat law fare, however. This is a short article about what Zuckerberg did. Pump was not “surgically removed” like the local never Trump wants to say. Zuckerberg rented the government in critical states in critical counties and skew the vote Democrat.
How Mark Zuckerberg Almost Handed Texas To The DemocratsThe Center for Technology and Civic Life flooded the second largest state with money from the Facebook founder.
No chain of custody on ballots. Government resources getting the Democrat vote out.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/how-mark-zuckerberg-almost-handed-texas-to-the-democrats/
Local talk radio cover that article for about 20 minutes yesterday.
I’m going to wait and see what she says. We’ve seen how formerly reliable journalists and pundits can suddenly turn into something not resembling their former selves. I hope Mollie doesn’t go this route because she’s a fav . . .