Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
I prefer to remember Rodman in his glorious “salad days” with the ’89 Pistons, playing under his mentor Chuck Daley (pre-Madonna, tattoos and excessive body piercings). The long, coltish legs and his openly emotional enthusiasm for playing D will endear him to me forever. Not to mention, this young dude (with help from Joe Dumars, of course) forever redefined the art of playing defense in the NBA. For this, he certainly deserves to be inducted.
As for VanDerveer, she and Pat Summitt practically invented girl’s basketball. Another worthy choice. :)
I think Sabonis should be a shoe-in. Here’s why: it’s the basketball, not the NBA, HOF. Sabonis was easily Walton’s equal. At Portland he was very effective, as an arthritic geriatric.
Imagine if you were judging Walton based on his career with the Celtics. That’s more or less what you’re doing with Arvydas.
Rodman belongs in the Hall. If crazy folk can be honored as authors, musicians, actors, & artists then there’s no reason that athletes should be left out.
Agreed! Brian C. Anderson has a good piece on him at NRO.
I could see why some think Dennis doesn’t belong, but I would respectfully disagree. In the ’96 Finals, he was on (and I mean on) Detlef Schrempf continuously. Schrempf came to the foul line still steaming at the latest indignity. Dennis took his position on the lane grinning at him with that particularly demented grin of his, and Schrempf missed both shots.
Some of Rodman’s best games were played between other peoples’ ears.
Some of Rodman’s best games were played between other peoples’ ears. ·Apr 4 at 5:23pm
So true, Percival! I would also argue that he outworked just about everyone on the court.
By the way, welcome to Ricochet, Percival! Come often and stay long.
I sense there may be a small, yet vociferous group of Rodman fans at Ricochet- just as it should be.
Thank you Ursula! I’ve been lurking here awhile before plunking down my dough. I’ve noticed the intelligent, respectful, and interesting conversations that are conducted here, and asked myself “what can I do to screw all this up?”
Just kidding. I don’t bite.
Anymore.
Much.
Lately.
re Rodman, the guy averaged 15+rebounds for many consecutive years. and was defensive player of the year twice IIRC. (Kevin Love is averaging 15+Reb on a very bad team. he may be a good spot up shooter, but that’s it. love gets his shot blocked a lot inside)
Sabonis was in his 30’s when he finally made it to the NBA. It was his intl career that was very impressive.
If Rodman had ever learned to hit an open 12-foot jump-shot, he’d have been a monster. His defensive game and his positioning on rebounds at both ends of the court were a thing of beauty. And on that 72-win Bulls team, he was incredibly valuable (his then-obvious insanity kept in check by the more ferocious and focused madman, Michael Jordan). HOF? I think so. I think he’s like a brilliant-fielding, weak hitting shortstop or a great interior lineman. His game wasn’t completely brilliant, but he dominated the best players in the game in facets at which he excelled.
he had a good shot selection and was a great finisher around the basket though.
Bill Walsh,
Thanks for the spot on analysis!
Artis Gilmore, about time!
he had a good shot selection and was a great finisher around the basket though. ·Apr 4 at 11:11pm
We don’t disagree. But he’d get a lot of open looks (because of his brilliant positional sense—and probably the other team’s slight regard for him as an offensive threat), and then, when he’d take the “you gotta shoot that” shot, he’d lay a lot of bricks. Occasionally when he’d get a hot hand and score 10 or 15, it’d change the whole complexion of the offense, because suddenly the D would have to account for him (and if he wanted to, he could get open—especially around the basket, as you say).
Thanks for the spot on analysis! ·Apr 4 at 11:11pm
Thanks. I blush.
Sabonis? Really? The guy was just one of a long line of injury prone centers for the Blazers (Walton, Bowie, Oden, to name a few). Bill Walton was the only one of that group that I would say did enough in his career to warrant HOF induction. Sabonis was an uncanny outlet passer, but beyond that there wasn’t much.
BUT – If you’re going to induct him, I don’t see how you could not induct Rodman.
Rodman in the Hall of Fame? Just another reason why I no longer follow or care about the NBA.
Chick Hearn’s death ended an era of great play by play announcers. Kobegate proved that most NBA players are not good role models. Why should I support that kind of lifestyle with my money?
Without Rodman pounding the boards, the Pistons never would have won those titles (the Bulls would have won with or without him). Of course, if the Pistons never won a championship then the Knicks never would have wasted their time with Isaiah Thomas . . .so in a way Rodman did more harm then good for us Knick fans.
Much to my chagrin, have to agree the Thomas- Dolan family “merger” was a toxic one, indeed. Too bad… Isaiah was an awfully exciting guard to watch in his day, but we musn’t blame the Worm!