Democrats Gone Wild!

 

Under single-party rule, the internecine battles are generally more interesting than their debates with their opposition. Partially because corruption is so easy and rampant under single-party rule. But also because, with no meaningful opposition, the ruling party can do whatever it wants. So under these circumstances, you really find out who these people are and what motivates them.

This presents a problem for the modern Democratic Party since it has no obvious ideological underpinnings. It’s not based on Marxism, or Socialism, or Communism, or Libertarianism, or any other over-riding political philosophy. The only reason the Democratic Party has to exist is simply the acquisition of power. And the people who are attracted to that, the ones who end up in charge when Democrats gain power, struggle with their lack of ethical guidance and their tendency to abuse the power they just gained. Or worse, they don’t struggle with it – they revel in it, given the chance. Once they control the White House, Congress, and our electoral process, you get “Democrats gone wild.” There are no brakes.

Symptomatic of the left’s lack of intellectual framework is the nature of their public intellectuals and other thinkers and writers. The right has Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Bill Buckley, and so on and so forth. The left has Bill Maher, Charlamagne Tha God, Don Lemon, and so on and so forth. There was a fascinating exchange between two leftist thinkers yesterday. In a discussion about whether Andrew Cuomo needs to resign, Bill Maher stated that he did not need an investigation to prove Cuomo’s guilt of sexual harassment, and that “… it’s always on a case-by-case basis …” and that “… I believe these women completely …” Charlamagne Tha God, who apparently differs from Mr. Maher in that he is capable of independent thought, had a different take on the matter:

Mr. God told Maher that it’s “kinda hard” to ask Cuomo to resign when “you voted for Joe Biden.”

He explained, “If you weren’t more upset with Joe Biden, who had more serious allegations–“

“No, he didn’t!” Maher exclaimed.

“Yeah, he was accused of actual rape,” Charlamagne said.

“No, he wasn’t,” Maher doubled down.

“What are you talking about?!” Charlamagne gasped.

“Are you talking about the hallway incident?” Maher asked.

“Tara Reade!” Charlamagne responded.

Please read the whole article. It’s fascinating. It’s hard for me to know who to root for, here. And apparently, Democrats aren’t sure, either. Understandably.

Another Democrat presidential hopeful in another one-party state, California’s Gov. Newsom, is probably watching all this with interest. He was a Democrat hero just a few months ago. And now his own party is trying to destroy him, too. Why? Hard to say. But it doesn’t matter.

But my point is that the infighting between power-hungry media mongers with no underlying ethical structure is going to make the next four years very, very odd. Just in the first month of the Biden administration, we have:

  • Shut down construction of the border wall, which was there to keep illegal immigrants out. While using razor wire and thousands of armed military troops around the US Capitol, to keep Americans out. Why? Hard to say. But it doesn’t matter.
  • No apparent plan to combat our enemies overseas, like China, Iran, North Korea, etc. While aggressively attacking Mr. Potato Head, Dr. Seuss, and sci-fi actresses. Why? Hard to say. But it doesn’t matter.
  • The governor of New York State earns an Emmy for his news conferences about his COVID policies, which killed thousands of people. He remains a media darling and is widely considered presidential material. And now, the Democrats are attempting to destroy him. Why? Hard to say. But it doesn’t matter.
  • Shut down the construction of a pipeline that America had promised to help build. So now, instead of transporting petroleum through an underground pipeline, we’ll be using trucks, trains, and tanker ships – all of which result in major spills from time to time. How does this help the environment? Hard to say. But it doesn’t matter.

I could go on and on, and you probably could too.

But this is only the beginning. With people like this in charge, it’s just hard to say what’s coming next. Joe Biden is famous for two things: Being not terribly intelligent and being spectacularly corrupt. Kamala Harris is famous for one thing: She will do anything – absolutely anything – for power. According to Willie Brown. And Mr. Brown’s wife. What have Mr. Biden and Mrs. Harris accomplished in their lives? What talents do they bring to their new jobs? Hard to say. But it doesn’t matter.

And these are the people in charge of the most powerful country the world has ever seen. So what will they do? Hard to say. What will they not do? That’s really hard to say.

Imagine being a lifelong Democrat voter, watching all this. I would think it would have to be disconcerting. Or at least, I really hope it is.

Because if a lifelong Democrat voter looks at all this and thinks, “Yep – this is what I’ve been hoping for…” then we have more serious problems than we think.

Mr. Maher, Mr. God, and millions of other Democrats are already struggling with how to handle this new reality. And when things are too strange for them, it certainly going to be very strange for the rest of us.

This would be fun to watch, if it was Greece or something. But the stability of the world depends largely on us – the most powerful country in the world. Everyone looks to us for security, stability, and predictability.

God help them.

Not Mr. God. But the real God.

God help them. And God help us.

Things are getting strange. We’ve been a one-party state for only six weeks, and things are getting really, really strange.

And you ain’t seen nuthin’ yet…

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 36 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Eugene Kriegsmann (View Comment):
    Humility is something they never learned, or, possibly, lack the capacity for. There is nothing more humbling than being the target for a total stranger who is trying to kill you or leading men into a place where that is happening. Or, standing in front of a group of children and knowing that their safety and their future may well depend on your ability to do your job competently. To understand, as a parent, that the parents of those children are expecting you to be as caring about their children as you expect your child’s teacher to be about your child. That kind of power is very humbling because it isn’t about the many. It is about every single one.

    The cruelest of the Chinese warlords and Samurai would laugh at your humility. Zulu old-timers and Vikings likewise. Throughout history, men of violence have disregarded the lives of those below them in a manner akin to mafia. The people are to be there to be fleeced for taxes and their food is to appropriated during campaigns but not much else is to be thought about them. It is often remarked that American soldiers seem different. Why? 

     

    • #31
  2. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    The point of closing down the pipeline construction to the US is to ensure it will be built to British Columbia so the Chinese will lock up the oil.

    And that the right does not pursue power as relentlessly as the left shows who is going to win. It won’t be the right unless it starts to do so.

    The asymmetry of the battle is inherent, since a core principle of “the right” is not having strong central power, so people of the right are generally not interested in pursuing power – in fact, people of the right generally consider pursuit of power as bad. So, the asymmetry of the battle will continue.

    Interesting point.  Makes sense . . .

    • #32
  3. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    The point of closing down the pipeline construction to the US is to ensure it will be built to British Columbia so the Chinese will lock up the oil.

    And that the right does not pursue power as relentlessly as the left shows who is going to win. It won’t be the right unless it starts to do so.

    The asymmetry of the battle is inherent, since a core principle of “the right” is not having strong central power, so people of the right are generally not interested in pursuing power – in fact, people of the right generally consider pursuit of power as bad. So, the asymmetry of the battle will continue.

    Put simply, we productive people don’t have time to indulge in nonsense.

    • #33
  4. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    Barfly (View Comment):

    The asymmetry of the battle is inherent, since a core principle of “the right” is not having strong central power, so people of the right are generally not interested in pursuing power – in fact, people of the right generally consider pursuit of power as bad. So, the asymmetry of the battle will continue.

    Put simply, we productive people don’t have time to indulge in nonsense.

    And that is a very serious problem.

    • #34
  5. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Flicker (View Comment):

    So just how aware are they? Your phrasing implies you think the problem is that they’re retards. I think they’re liars and thieves. We’re probably both right.

    Rather, they (and we and everyone else for that matter) cling to old assumptions because they are familiar and because losing your world-view means a lot of work rebuilding.

    Or perhaps they cling to assumptions because losing your world view means discarding millennia of proven beneficial societal structure.

    Yeah, I think that’s the most important reason, in the range of 68 to 95%, of the sum of psychological forces that push people to the left. Ahem.

    The progressive project is and always has been a transfer of wealth, status, and power from those who work at objectively measurable pursuits to those who do not.

    • #35
  6. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    The asymmetry of the battle is inherent, since a core principle of “the right” is not having strong central power, so people of the right are generally not interested in pursuing power – in fact, people of the right generally consider pursuit of power as bad. So, the asymmetry of the battle will continue.

    Put simply, we productive people don’t have time to indulge in nonsense.

    And that is a very serious problem.

    I want to turn the circumstances so that it’s our opportunity.

    • #36
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.