News Flash: I’m Not a Systemic Racist

 

The time has arrived when I can no longer tolerate accusations of systemic racism without speaking out against it. It is one of the most hateful, absurd, and propagandistic concepts being spread all over the world. And for some reason, many white people have embraced their supposed hatred of people of color and claim they are guilty of this detestable belief.

I’m here to tell you that I am not only not a part of this misguided theory, but it is a theory that has been created to attack white Americans for the indefinite future and have them begging for forgiveness.

I am going to limit my examination of systemic racism to what I know and my own experience, rather than discuss the lies that have been perpetrated, mixed with a few facts, to discount our Founders and the birth of our nation. I have read some of them myself, and they are so irrational and distorted that I know their trashing of our history is not to be taken seriously. Instead, I am going to look at systemic racism through my own personal prism: my history, my belief system, my self-reflection, and my self-knowledge.

My History

I grew up in mainly white Orange County, California. Now and then I would come across black people, and of course they looked different than most of the people I encountered. By different, I mean the kinds of things we notice about others: unusual hairstyles; friends who limped from experiencing polio as a child; people with scars from tragic accidents; all of them looked different, which made them unique.

Once I went to college at California State University, Long Beach, I encountered more black and Asian students. I was a loner, so I wasn’t much friendly with anyone.

My Belief System

My folks never made judgments about other races or religions. We didn’t have meaningful discussions over the dinner table. It’s just not what we did. I can say that they had many black artists that they loved, Sammy Davis Jr. and Harry Belafonte for two, but their color was never mentioned.

But once I stepped into the big bad world and I grew up in the ’60s in Southern California, racism was front and center. I was close enough to the Rodney King Riots that I could see smoke drifting in the air. But I never drew conclusions about blacks as a group. Besides, every race was represented in the violence and looting.

I was called a “dirty Jew” as a child a couple of times, but never as an adult. And other people may have disliked, even hated me, because I was a Jew, but they never said so. I did date an anti-Semite for a very brief time (I dated him because I was curious about his thinking), but eventually he stopped asking me out. I suspect he found me repulsive. So be it.

My Self-Reflections

I’ve reflected on my beliefs about the races. I’ve actually had a lot of interaction with people from Asian cultures and their race didn’t matter to me (nor mine to them). I’ve worked with Latinos and we all did just fine; I remember one fascinating discussion with a group of supervisors who were Latinos and were bilingual. I asked them if they spoke English or Spanish at home and it was a great discussion. (They spoke English to their siblings but sometimes Spanish to their parents.) I have made a few friends who are black, and lost a very dear friend a couple of years ago. We would talk about racism, but not about my own beliefs on race.

* * * * *

So let me digress for a moment to offer a definition of systemic racism :

Systemic racism is both a theoretical concept and a reality. As a theory, it is premised on the research-supported claim that the United States was founded as a racist society, that racism is thus embedded in all social institutions, structures, and social relations within our society. Rooted in a racist foundation, systemic racism today is composed of intersecting, overlapping, and codependent racist institutions, policies, practices, ideas, and behaviors that give an unjust amount of resources, rights, and power to White people while denying them to people of color.

First, I reject the premise that America was founded as a racist country. It is factually and culturally not true. The racism that was so virulent in our early years as a country has been addressed at all levels of society—culturally, legally, governmentally—and I believe that although it still exists, it is far from being systemic.

What I find especially egregious is that parts of the community accuse every white person in this country of being a part of a belief system that they invented from scratch. And they are prepared to declare that white people are pathetic creatures, victimized by this hateful and pervasive doctrine. They are claiming that we have been indoctrinated by this damaging system that is impossible to escape. (I’ve never heard an explanation for those people who are not purely white, but come from the mixture of many races, but I’m not much interested either.)

Self-Knowledge

The most important point I want to make is that people who embrace the systemic racism theory assume that they know me better than I know myself. That is absurd.

They don’t know my favorite ice cream, the kinds of books I read, my hobbies or my education history, and lots more. In fact, most people don’t know anything about me. But they assume because they believe this is a racist country, and because there have been times, blatant and subtle where they have experienced racism, that every white person must be racist and behave in the same way.

They are wrong.

More than that, I have another news flash. I believe that people have the right to believe anything they wish, no matter how misguided and hateful. I have a liberal friend who likes to say that if people have hateful thoughts, they will act on them.

She’s wrong.

If I get angry at you, I may have the impulse to strike at you. But I am a human being with a brain. I can choose not to hit you and take responsibility for my anger. I may be angry at you for a long time. But my feelings are my business, not yours. I am the one who gets to decide how I feel about all aspects of my life, from chocolate chip ice cream to white supremacy. And whatever my feelings are, they are none of your business.

Even if I hate you.

For a person who believes in systemic racism to say that in spite of their not knowing anything about me, they know the feelings and beliefs that I hold in the deepest recesses of my mind is beyond ridiculous. I am not a victim of my environment; instead, I am a mature, curious, loving person who can decide what I believe in my life.

One of the biggest problems with “systemic racism” is that it ignores agency. That means I have choices in my life about what to believe, how to feel, what to learn and how to act. It is an amazing gift that every human being receives. And as a result, I can choose how I want to feel about anything or anyone.

That choice is mine and mine alone.

No proponent of systemic racism can tell me otherwise.

Published in Culture
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 39 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    But I’m also reading that systemic racism is a good thing that needs to be encouraged.

    The Coca Cola company proudly requires its legal work to be done by workers divided by race and sex. Law firms must assign black attorneys to at least 15% of the company’s work. White male attorneys are permitted to do no more than 70% of the company’s work. Coke says that within two years white male attorneys will be permitted to do no more than 50% of the company’s work.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/01/coca-cola-imposes-racial-quotas-on-outside-counsel-staffing/

    If you prefer a source that is more aligned with the idea that racism is a good idea:

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/coke-gc-tired-of-good-intentions-wants-law-firm-diversity-now

     

    You’re going to make me feel virtuous for not drinking their swill.

    • #31
  2. American Abroad Thatcher
    American Abroad
    @AmericanAbroad

    Stad (View Comment):

    Another thing people need to be told over and over again was the Founding Fathers intentionally set up a system whereby slavery could be ended legally and without bloodshed (didn’t happen, but there you go). A lie associated with the founding was that the Fathers only viewed slaves as 3/5 of a human being. This compromise had to do with representation, and it actually crippled the Southern states who wanted slaves to be counted as whole persons – not unlike modern Democrats who want to count illegals . . .

    This is exactly why we need to study history.  It is very rare to see the 3/5 compromise reported properly.  Good job, Stad.  The 3/5 compromise weakened the slave states!  But when you start with your conclusion that America is racist, the 3/5 compromise seems like good evidence.  

    • #32
  3. No Caesar Thatcher
    No Caesar
    @NoCaesar

    Well, since January 20th we’ve been on a path of implementing systemic racism.  I’d say by 2022 there’s a pretty good chance there will be systemic racism.  But not of the variety claimed by BLM….

    • #33
  4. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    No Caesar (View Comment):

    Well, since January 20th we’ve been on a path of implementing systemic racism. I’d say by 2022 there’s a pretty good chance there will be systemic racism. But not of the variety claimed by BLM….

    I get your point, @nocaesar. I hate to say it but they will have brought it on themselves.

    • #34
  5. No Caesar Thatcher
    No Caesar
    @NoCaesar

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    No Caesar (View Comment):

    Well, since January 20th we’ve been on a path of implementing systemic racism. I’d say by 2022 there’s a pretty good chance there will be systemic racism. But not of the variety claimed by BLM….

    I get your point, @ nocaesar. I hate to say it but they will have brought it on themselves.

    That’s their objective.  Democrats = Racists.  Always been, (probably) always will be.  Anything that does not measure someone on what they do with themselves, but revels in their group identify. 

    • #35
  6. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    No Caesar (View Comment):
    That’s their objective. Democrats = Racists. Always been, (probably) always will be. Anything that does not measure someone on what they do with themselves, but revels in their group identify. 

    Slowly but surely, I think that minorities are going to realize the disdain the Dems hold for them. I think we saw that in the election, although the MSM doesn’t discuss it much at all. 

    • #36
  7. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio…
    @ArizonaPatriot

    tigerlily (View Comment):
    At the time of our founding circa 1776, there was no politically viable anti-Slavery movement anywhere in the world. However, that changed rapidly. In the US, the northern states began to abolish slavery, the US under the Articles of Confederation enacted the Northwest Ordinance (1787) which prohibited slavery in those territories/future states, and in England, Thomas Clarkson and Granville Sharpe founded the Society of the Abolition of the Slave Trade in 1787, and in 1792 William Wilberforce put forward his first slave trade abolition bill which eventually also pass in 1808.

    The Vermont Constitution of 1777 outlawed slavery (here is the full text).  The relevant provision is Chapter I, Sec. I, which says:

    THAT all men are born equally free and independent, and have certain natural, inherent and unalienable rights, amongst which are the enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety. Therefore, no male person, born in this country, or brought from over sea, ought to be holden by law, to serve any person, as a servant, slave or apprentice, after he arrives to the age of twenty-one Years, nor female, in like manner, after she arrives to the age of eighteen years, unless they are bound by their own consent, after they arrive to such age, or bound by law, for the payment of debts, damages, fines, costs, or the like.

    Vermont is a special case, as it was a disputed territory at the time, claimed by both New York and New Hampshire, but which claimed independence in its own right.  The dispute was settled, and Vermont was admitted as the fourteenth state — the first after the original 13 — in 1791.

    The Northern states in the US were generally a bit ahead of Britain in the abolition of slavery.  Pennsylvania abolished slavery by statute in 1780, though it was a gradual emancipation provision that was not retroactive.  Slavery was abolished in Massachusetts by a trio of judicial decisions in 1781-83, which held that the 1780 Massachusetts Constitution had implicitly outlawed slavery.

    This occurred before any significant movement in Britain against slavery, and before the great William Wilberforce took up the cause.  Wilberforce, by the way, was truly great and is an inspiration, but he was actually following the lead of the Americans.

    I think that tigerlily is off by one year regarding the British abolition of the slave trade.  Britain did so by Act of Parliament in 1807 — my source says that the British Act was passed on February 23, 1807; received royal assent on March 25, 1807; and became effective on May 1, 1807.

    This was essentially simultaneous with the abolition of the slave trade by the US. My source says that the American Act was passed by Congress, and signed by President Jefferson, on March 2, 1807.  It was not effective until January 1, 1808, however, due to the Constitutional compromise that prohibited such legislation for 20 years.

    • #37
  8. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio…
    @ArizonaPatriot

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    No Caesar (View Comment):
    That’s their objective. Democrats = Racists. Always been, (probably) always will be. Anything that does not measure someone on what they do with themselves, but revels in their group identify.

    Slowly but surely, I think that minorities are going to realize the disdain the Dems hold for them. I think we saw that in the election, although the MSM doesn’t discuss it much at all.

    Sadly, I don’t think that you’re correct about this.  The purpose of the systemic racism charge is to uphold, and extend, the strange phenomenon of black supremacy.  I use “black supremacy” to refer to pro-black racist policies, which explicitly or implicitly give special privileges and preferences to blacks.  Examples are racial preferences in college admissions, or scholarships, or in hiring and promotion in employment.

    I would expect many black voters to like these policies.  They get an advantage.

    • #38
  9. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    No Caesar (View Comment):
    That’s their objective. Democrats = Racists. Always been, (probably) always will be. Anything that does not measure someone on what they do with themselves, but revels in their group identify.

    Slowly but surely, I think that minorities are going to realize the disdain the Dems hold for them. I think we saw that in the election, although the MSM doesn’t discuss it much at all.

    Sadly, I don’t think that you’re correct about this. The purpose of the systemic racism charge is to uphold, and extend, the strange phenomenon of black supremacy. I use “black supremacy” to refer to pro-black racist policies, which explicitly or implicitly give special privileges and preferences to blacks. Examples are racial preferences in college admissions, or scholarships, or in hiring and promotion in employment.

    I would expect many black voters to like these policies. They get an advantage.

    I think it’s to uphold and extend the phenomenon of ruling class supremacy, which leaves out the majority of black people.

    • #39
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.