Silicon Valley vs. Free Speech

 

Suddenly, free speech is in serious trouble.

Six years ago, CEO Jack Dorsey could proclaim “Twitter stands for freedom of expression. We stand for speaking truth to power.“ Last week, Dorsey and other big tech titans unleashed a massive speech suppression initiative, based on the notion that not only President Trump, but also anyone who supported him, including conservatives and Republicans en masse, must be silenced in the interest of public safety.

The silencing was comprehensive and ruthless. Recently increased censorship in social media had all been directed to the right. Then Facebook and Twitter joined in a permanent ban of the president. It was necessary to silence the President of the United States, according to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, because his claims of voter fraud were false and it would be dangerous to allow him to keep making them.

Zuckerberg is flat wrong in asserting the absence of widespread voter fraud. But by last Wednesday, Trump had gone too far in pressing his case to overturn the election. Even if the rules were skewed and cheating occurred, it was time to move on, with lessons learned.

But Trump’s intemperance aside, Facebook‘s extraordinary action doesn’t pass the logic test. Trump’s rhetoric was heated, but politicians commonly encourage participants to “fight“ and persevere for their cause.

Several legal experts have opined that his speech wouldn’t qualify as incitement. He never called for violence nor storming the capital. If merely expressing an opinion that could lead some to violence merits expulsion, then Facebook must disallow many other opinions routinely expressed on its platform.

Moreover, the need to avoid further danger was clearly unnecessary. At the time the bans were instituted, the Capitol area had been cleared and Congress was back in session by the end of the day. The perpetrators were universally condemned from both sides of the aisle and slated for prosecution. There was zero chance of recurring violence at that point.

But the tyrants didn’t stop there. They tried to close off the exits for those fleeing speech oppression by effectively banning Parler, a site recently popular with voices on the right who had been canceled on other platforms.

Not only did Google and Apple ban Parler from their App Stores, but Amazon suspended its hosting services, shutting off all Parler’s servers. Taken together, these actions amounted to not only an attempt to suppress specific persons, but an entire point of view.

Silicon Valley moguls only pretend to have a policy against promoting violence. Otherwise, they would have moved against the BLM/Antifa inspired riots that raged nightly in America last summer. Like the Capitol rioters, they were incensed by perceived injustices and demanding to be heard.

But their “mostly peaceful“ protests, organized through social media, included extensive looting, arson, and bodily harm. Yet they were never deplatformed. They weren’t even criticized then by Democratic leaders like Pelosi, Biden, and AOC.

A Senator named Kamala Harris encouraged them to “keep going“ and organized funding for bail bonds. Night after night police were ordered to stand down while the mayhem continued. From the social media providers now feigning deep concern over violence … crickets.

There’s a word for those who spurn democratic processes and instead attempt to cancel and intimidate their opponents and it’s not “progressive.” It’s “totalitarian.” The American Left is no longer about live-and-let-live, or agree-to-disagree. Like the dictators of the collectivist states they admire, they aspire to permanent, total victory over a prostrated foe.

Thus the political director of ABC News called for a “cleansing” of Trump followers. Another media mogul proposed putting the children of Republicans in “re-education camps.” Trump’s legislative supporters have been threatened with expulsion.

The Big Tech CEOs are among the most wealthy, powerful people in the world. For defenders of free speech, facing their hostility plus that of the incoming administration will be a major burden.

But Americans are resilient. Free-speech rights are built into our DNA. We still believe with former Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo that “freedom of speech is the matrix, the indispensable condition of nearly every other form of freedom.”

America is still worth defending.

Published in Politics, Science & Technology
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

There are 7 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    https://rushbabe49.com/2020/11/21/i-believe-my-life-might-be-in-actual-danger-next-year/

    https://rushbabe49.com/2021/01/09/annals-of-tyranny-part-iii-the-digital-curtain-descends/

    https://rushbabe49.com/2021/01/14/are-we-and-they-blind-taking-media-censorship-to-the-next-step/

    • #1
  2. 9thDistrictNeighbor Member
    9thDistrictNeighbor
    @9thDistrictNeighbor

    Tom Patterson: The American Left is no longer about live-and-let-live, or agree-to-disagree. Like the dictators of the collectivist states they admire, they aspire to permanent, total victory over a prostrated foe.

    Someone inside Twitter provided Project Veritas with just-released video of Jack Dorsey,

    “We are focused on one account [@realDonaldTrump] right now, but this is going to be much bigger than just one account, and it’s going to go on for much longer than just this day, this week, and the next few weeks, and go on beyond the inauguration,” he (Dorsey) said.

    • #2
  3. Richard Easton Member
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    It’s not time to move on from the voting fraud allegations. We need a simple easily audited way of voting and tabulating the votes. Nothing will happen without constant public pressure. Trump’s highlighting it gives us a brief interval to push changes. Otherwise, we risk becoming another Venezuela.

    • #3
  4. Mikescapes Member
    Mikescapes
    @Mikescapes

    Wish I’d said that first!

    I/m/o, the radical Dems (actually all of them) want to crush the Republican Party and Conservatism. The media and Silicon Valley are complicit. They seek an all, or almost all, Blue country – one party rule. It’s a shaming process. If you voted for Trump or identify with the Right you are guilty. Of what? Doesn’t matter to the Left. And it’s working so far. Many on the Right are ashamed of Trump to begin with. Now they are keeping their heads down. 

    Trump’s comments prior to the Capitol break-in were stupid. True, they don’t get close to the standard of incitement, but stupid nonetheless. Guiliani’s speech used the word “combat”. Trump relied on this washed up politician for advice. Not incitement, but mindless. If political stupidity were grounds for impeachment I’d agree. But it’s not. Trump’s endless belligerence alienated people, including Conservatives, and played into the Democrats’ hands.

    I think Trump turned out to be a very poor politician, despite his many accomplishments. He was outmaneuvered  by the Left.

    • #4
  5. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio…
    @ArizonaPatriot

    I generally agree with the OP.

    My main objection is the first word.  “Suddenly.”

    The trend in this direction has been evident for quite some time.  I do agree that the Big Tech actions over the past week or so are a “giant step” in the wrong direction.

    • #5
  6. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Tom Patterson: Free-speech rights are built into our DNA. We still believe with former Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo that “freedom of speech is the matrix, the indispensable condition of nearly every other form of freedom.”

    Sorry, but you are completely wrong about this. For Americans under the age of 40, the free speech instinct is just not there. It hasn’t been taught, so abstract appeals to “our bedrock freedoms” (or whatever) just do not resonate. Not being (or perceived to be) mean is a much higher priority than freedom of speech.

    • #6
  7. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    Remember when Google’s motto was “Don’t be Evil”?  Well, it all depends on how you define “evil”, doesn’t it?

    • #7