Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
So Much for Impeachment: McConnell Won’t Reconvene Senate
When Nancy Pelosi moved forward on impeachment Monday, I said it was likely all for show rather than for removing President Trump from office. This just in — it was all for show.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) office told Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) staff on Wednesday that the GOP will not agree to reconvene the Senate before Jan. 19 to allow an impeachment trial while President Trump is still in office.
A senior Senate Republican aide confirmed that McConnell’s office reached out to Schumer’s office to relay the message that Republicans will not agree to a Friday session to enable House Democrats to present articles of impeachment to the Senate while Trump is in office.
McConnell said in a memo circulated to colleagues last week that the Senate will not be able to handle business on the floor until senators are scheduled to return to Washington on Jan. 19 unless all 100 senators agree to reconvene sooner.
Since Vice President Pence won’t invoke the 25th Amendment, Donald Trump will complete his term as President, unless he decides to resign. This just in — he’s not going to resign.
Of course, impeachment can continue after Biden is inaugurated and Chuck Schumer becomes Senate Majority Leader. But, by then, what’s the point? It won’t be viewed as “saving the Republic from Trump,” but just another petulant partisan battle. President Biden’s “first 100 days” agenda will be mired in the muck, including any additional COVID relief checks. If you think Americans are generally annoyed now, try delaying financial assistance so Democrats can shout “orange man bad” for another month.
As the Capitol Hill Riot was wrapping up, I infamously advised “Impeach. Remove. Bar from Office.” In order for that to happen, Pelosi would have needed to deliver the impeachment article to the Senate by the end of last week. Emotions were high enough in both parties for removal to have any chance of getting through. There was also great concern (myself included) that Trump would keep stirring the pot and spark further violence in DC and around the country.
Instead, Trump has been quiet as a Twitterless church mouse, MAGAntifa attackers have been rounded up, and no new violence has erupted.
Published in Politics
I hope all of the above is true. What is this story about protests at all the state houses? I don’t think impeachment will do anything but encourage that. It’s been so stressful – everyday life, earning a living, trying to stay well, pay the bills. I hope we can get through the rest of the month with no more turmoil. You are right about the Biden administration having their hands full when they take the reins – hope they are up to the task.
This is very debatable. I don’t see it based on what I’ve heard.
The Constitution says a President can be impeached. Trump won’t be President when the senate reconvenes. He will be a private citizen. Then the whole process becomes a Bill of Attainder, doesn’t it?
I think McConnell’s trial balloon got shot down.
The point of continuing impeachment after Biden’s inauguration would be pretty much the same as initiating it now–revenge and the use of invective.
#AmericaUnited
Well, I could provide the obvious punchline, but I think I will skip it.
So, it’s yet another case of “Full of sound and fury; signifying nothing”. More scraps thrown to the baying hounds on both sides.
Meanwhile, seven thousand miles away, our enemy watches silently, smiling at our idiocy.
Everyone gets what they want, well except for part of the Republicans and unaffiliated moderates. If seventy percent of Republicans want Trump viable as a force in four years, they don’t want him impeached. The Democrats want Trump running as Republican in four years so they don’t want to impeach. Ironically, Sen. McConnell bails out the Dems from blame by their constituents. They can continue the bluff that they need and demand removal, but for Mitch!
Instead, Trump has been quiet as a Twitterless church mouse, MAGAntifa attackers have been rounded up, and no new violence has erupted.
Twitter cancelled him. Gab has his entire Twitter history but that will probably wait until the stolen election is completed. The Antifa cadre that organized the Capitol riot will mostly disappear as they did in Portland and Minneapolis. A few Trump supporters will be pursued by the FBI as a holy quest and probably wind up with 10 year prison terms. You know what DC juries are like. If you don’t, consider that Geoffrey Craig (D) was acquitted of the same charge that sent Manafor to solitary confinement.
I thought an impeachment has to take place in one session of Congress, not 2.
There’s only one reason I can think of for this change of mind among the Beltway Republicans. They are seeing a negative reaction from the public, which Internet traffic and aggregators allow them to see instantly, as those opinions are being posted.
Jon, thanks for the update.
It’s not clear whether the impeachment proceeding can continue after Trump leaves office. Byron York’s podcast yesterday (here) argues that it cannot, and he quotes a federal judge on the issue.
I think that it’s an unsettled question.
Trump impeached.
For the record, House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump:
Katko (NY)
Cheney (Wy)
Kinzinger (Ill)
Upton (Mich)
Beautler (Wash)
Newhouse (Wash)
Meijer (Mich)
Rice (SC)
Gonzalez (Oh)
Valadao (Cal)
And he’s going nowhere. Haaa haa!
I have real issues with the dude, but this is hilarious!
Except the “bar from office” provision is still in play, right? Isn’t that really what this is all about: barring Trump from running again in 2024?
Yes, but the legal argument from Dershowitz and, I suppose, York is that the process is only available for a subject that is currently holding office. And Jerry, above, is probably right that that is an open question, at least.
His lawyers could certainly present that in his defense at the trial, and then I guess it would be up to either Justice Roberts or the full Senate to vote on whether or not they agree.
That is a possible punishment, in addition to removal from office. Both seem to depend on the office holder being an office holder, not a former office holder.
I don’t understand the notion of holding an impeachment trial after Trump is out of office. Makes no sense. Has the Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of it?
Anyway, I’m glad the Senate won’t take this up. Let’s just start clean as we take on the role of the opposition.
Since the primary result of impeachment is removal, and there is no need for removal once Trump is gone, it seems obvious that the motivation is hatred/revenge.
(Emphasis added.)
It is also a tacit admission that he would crush them politically if he ran again. Better to deplatform him and leave his followers to wander in the wilderness without a voice in Washington. The other surprise of the coverage of the Capitol riot was the number of Capitol police who were willing to express support for Trump, before and after. With Marxist Democrats and Corporatists colluding to destroy the wages of average Americans by every means available, a return to Obamaism where the definition of prosperity is access to food stamps, Trump could draw more votes come 2023.
As far as passing on the mantle goes, Trump may be worse than Teddy Roosevelt, who famously destroyed his party by bucking his own handpicked successor.