On the ‘Sacredness’ of Our Institutions

 

Let me get the disclaimer done with: I don’t support rioting or invasions of government buildings. They should be stopped with whatever force is necessary.

But I’m not buying that there was some sort of desecration going on in the invasion of the Capitol Building. What is sacred in this nation is not institutions or buildings, but individual rights, liberty, and life. Whatever sacredness our institutions have is derivative of their core purpose in securing individual liberty. That’s a peculiarity of this nation we sometimes forget. The king is sacred in England, or the party in Communist China, but in a constitutional republic like ours, our government has only derivative sacredness.

We wave the flag, celebrate the Fourth of July, and have monuments in Washington DC as a way of holding individual liberty sacred. We should feel a sense of desecration when those core individual rights are violated, and only in a lesser sense when there is some attack on the institutions that protect them. George W. Bush expressed this in the wake of 9/11 when he said that “freedom had been attacked.” He understood that the significance of the attack on the Pentagon Building wasn’t that the building itself was really threatened, but that the real target was the individual liberty for which this nation stands. That is the thing to be concerned about.

Actual desecrations of individual rights and liberty have been occurring most of this year. To have secure individual rights means that one can trust that your rights won’t be violated by the government, and that the government will protect your rights from others who wish to violate them. Yet for most of this year, the government routinely stood by while BLM and Antifa rioters looted and burned private property, harassed citizens in their homes and at restaurants, blocked intersections, or set up “autonomous zones.” How many ordinary people’s lives were destroyed in these events? That is the desecration I am worried about. It happened when Joe Sixpack lost his livelihood when his hardware store was looted and burned, while police watched and did nothing.

By contrast, how many lives were destroyed in the Capitol Building invasion? I’m not talking about the rioters themselves. You get involved in a riot, you take your chances. I’m talking about ordinary, innocent people who go home from work and show up the next day to find their store looted. As far as I know, the number is zero. Whatever damage was done to the Capitol Building will be quickly repaired. In a few weeks, you won’t even be able to tell it ever happened. You can still see the boarded-up businesses in Portland and other cities, however.

Capitol Buildings, Congresses, Presidents, and Senates are not sacred. It is the individual liberty they are supposed to secure that is sacred.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 69 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    PHCheese (View Comment):

    Antifa tried to burn the Federal Court House for over a 100 nights this summer. Did we a word from the Democrats?

    Yes, encouragement.

    I think that is also called, what’s the word, oh yes… “incitement”.

     

    • #61
  2. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    Over the summer and fall, we saw a number of violent and often riotous attacks on public monuments, and I think that most of us were appalled.

    Most of us who are not Demoncrats.

    However it was cheered on by the leadership of the House of Representatives.

    Further, while flag burning may be protected speech, according to a judge in DC, that is only the case with the American flag. Try to burn a BLM flag and you are banned from entering DC.

    So, compared to the actual rights and privileges of liberty, the symbols of liberty come a distant second.

    • #62
  3. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    J Climacus (View Comment):

    What the Right should have done is forcefully reject the Capitol Hill assault, but also reject the Left’s elevation of it to some uniquely serious, quasi-religious “desecration”. Instead they fell into the trap of accepting the left’s scale of values with respect to recent events. We are now seeing the results.

    I would make a joke about them being the Stupid Party, but frankly, I think Mitch McConnell knew this would happen, and went along with the Democrats anyway to kneecap the dominant trend in the Republican party; and that is why I’ve hated him since Mississippi.

    • #63
  4. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… Member
    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio…
    @ArizonaPatriot

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    I do not agree with the elevation of liberty above all else. Liberty is an important value. There are other important values, often in conflict with liberty.

    I was hoping you would suggest what you thought they were.

    The answer is a bit lengthy, so I’ll refer you to my prior post What Are the Central Principles of the American Founding, here.  I proposed 11 principles, derived from the Declaration and Constitution.  This was written just over a year ago.

    • #64
  5. Ralphie Inactive
    Ralphie
    @Ralphie

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    The Capitol should be treated with respect, but it’s interesting that small businesses that are the lifeblood of communities and those who own them are not considered as sacred as a building that’s housed any number of scoundrels.

    My first thought, and I still laugh at their fear and anger over what happened TO THEM.  The guy crying over the loss of his business that represented life savings was just a pawn in their game.

    • #65
  6. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):
    I would make a joke about them being the Stupid Party, but frankly, I think Mitch McConnell knew this would happen, and went along with the Democrats anyway to kneecap the dominant trend in the Republican party; and that is why I’ve hated him since Mississippi.

    What happened in Mississippi?

    • #66
  7. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Instugator (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):
    I would make a joke about them being the Stupid Party, but frankly, I think Mitch McConnell knew this would happen, and went along with the Democrats anyway to kneecap the dominant trend in the Republican party; and that is why I’ve hated him since Mississippi.

    What happened in Mississippi?

    Long story short: Chris McDaniel was sort of a hybrid Tea Party/populist candidate who won more votes than Thad Cochran, an Establishment squish, in the 2014 Republican Senate primary.  During the run-off election, McConnell (who during this time was openly at war against Tea Party challengers) helped orchestrate a campaign that amounted to portraying Chris McDaniel (and by extension his voters) as a racist and an extremist, in an effort to get progressive Democrats to vote in the run-off for Thad Cochran.  It worked 

    • #67
  8. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):
    I’ve been piously lectured at all year that the destruction of monuments is no big deal, and that longstanding cultural icons are subject to Cancellation to appease a rabid minority no matter how many millions are hurt and made to feel like officially designated ‘deplorables’ by the act. I’m not about to freak out now that a janitor at Capital building, which now symbolizes nothing more than a techno-fascist, illiberal regime, has to work overtime.

    The Capitol building bombers of 1983 felt the same.

    If these rioters had bombed the capital, no one would be arguing with you. Incidentally, didn’t one of the perpetrators get pardoned, and is now working for BLM?

    This seems like a good time to bring up the fact that in 1954 Puerto Rican Nationalists fired 30 shots into the Well of the House of Representatives while it was in session, injuring 5.

    This was far more of an attack on our system of government than what happened last week.

    It considered such an outrageous act, that less than 25 years later President Carter pardoned the perpetrators, who were given a heroes welcome on their return to Puerto Rico.

     

    • #68
  9. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    J Climacus (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Bottom line, I guess this whole discussion reminds me of the story about the Clinton supporter on Inauguration Day who saw the jets fly over, and said “Those are our planes now.” Love of country and its tangible symbols does not depend on the passions of the day, and its manifestations do not belong to one side or the other.

    My bottom line is that we are talking about the elevation of symbol over substance, of the material over the spiritual. Using the language of desecration only when the material symbols of our liberties are attacked, but not when their substance was violated, has been a masterful move of misdirection initiated by the left. It implicitly downgrades the seriousness of all the cancelling, property rights, and free speech violations that have recently occurred. After all, if it’s only when the Capitol Building is physically assaulted that our language rises to religious levels, then those rights violations can’t really be that bad, can they?

    Look what has happened in the wake of the Capitol Hill assault. In the name of preventing further “desecrations” the left has put the deplatforming and cancelling into overdrive. Heck, they’ve deplatformed the sitting President of the United States! That’s why the Capitol Hill assault was such a dumb idea. It gave the left the excuse to destroy our liberties even further in the name of protecting our institutions from some quasi-religious “desecration” understood in purely material terms. Like it’s OK to deplatform the President in the name of preventing someone from spray painting the White House. Don’t people get that it’s the deplatforming that is the real desecration?

    What the Right should have done is forcefully reject the Capitol Hill assault, but also reject the Left’s elevation of it to some uniquely serious, quasi-religious “desecration”. Instead they fell into the trap of accepting the left’s scale of values with respect to recent events. We are now seeing the results.

    In 2011 the Wisconsin State Capitol was occupied and mobbed for days, even weeks, because some people were opposed to Gov. Walkers reform bill.

    I was told by supporters of that occupation, “This is what Democracy looks like”.  There was a promotional clip for a local newscast that was shown repeatedly for months afterwards, which included one of the protestors screaming ‘This is *OUR* House”.

    So you’ll forgive me if I don’t get too misty-eyed over the lamentations of the sacredness of a building that I’m hearingthis week 

     

     

    • #69
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.