House Dems Introduce Article of Impeachment

 

House Democrats introduced an article of impeachment against Donald Trump on Monday. It charges the President with “incitement of insurrection” for encouraging the crowd at Wednesday’s “Stop the Steal” rally to march to the U.S. Capitol. The ensuing riot temporarily shut down the legislative branch and resulted in deaths. The text follows (click to enlarge):

Before pursuing impeachment, the House will vote on a resolution asking Vice President Mike Pence to activate the 25th Amendment and remove Trump. If Pence does not respond within 24 hours of its passage, the House will consider impeachment.

There are only nine days left before Donald Trump’s presidential term ends.


My quick analysis is that this is all for show. If Speaker Pelosi actually wanted to remove Trump from office before Jan. 20, the House would have voted for impeachment by Friday (or over the weekend at the very latest) and delivered it to the Senate Monday. She doesn’t need to issue ultimatums to Pence, since Congress has the power to remove the President whenever they like.

Pelosi also is well aware that the Senate is out of session and Senate Majority Leader said the earliest they could reconvene is after Joe Biden’s inauguration.

 

Published in Politics
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 100 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    House impeaches.

    House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump:

    Katko (NY)

    Cheney (Wy)

    Kinzinger (Ill)

    Upton (Mich)

    Beautler (Wash)

    Newhouse (Wash)

    Meijer (Mich)

    Rice (SC)

    Gonzalez (Oh)

    Valadao (Cal)

    Now that’s splitting the party. 

    • #91
  2. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Manny (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    House impeaches.

    House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump:

    Katko (NY)

    Cheney (Wy)

    Kinzinger (Ill)

    Upton (Mich)

    Beautler (Wash)

    Newhouse (Wash)

    Meijer (Mich)

    Rice (SC)

    Gonzalez (Oh)

    Valadao (Cal)

    Now that’s splitting the party.

    I don’t knw anything about any of them other than Cheney.

    • #92
  3. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    Manny (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):
    Is the impeachment all for show? It seems to me they are doing it for two reasons. (1) To force Republicans to defend Trump, and therefore brand the party negatively. (2) Bring in donations from the rapid anti Trump crowd to build up their coffers.

    There are millions of Trump supporters out there who don’t mind one bit being branded. We had plenty of money for the November election, and the impeachment will only inspire us to give more. Our so-called money troubles, I am convinced, stem from the RNC chair having no clue as to how the money should be effectively allocated. We are desperately in need of a better RNC chair who is public relations and tv savvy and is not a relative of Mitt Romney.

    I think it splits the Republicans. Any split is a negative to the party. After supporting him for four years and voting for him twice, I’m done. I can’t tolerate him any more.

    Edit: And let me add, the results in Georgia Senate run off showed how he splits the party.

    Trump didn’t split the party. The party abandoned its constituency.

    He is the only meaningful representation for those who were formerly in an effete and ineffectual and self-interested party machine that only consistently turns its back on its voters.

    Well, I see it as Trump’s behavior split the party. I guess you can’t imagine how his behavior at times repulses people. This is basically why NeverTrumpers exist. You have to be blind to not see them. Of course Trump has split the party. Be honest with the situation or we don’t improve.

    Ronald Reagan split the party. Parties need to be split from time to time. It’s a sign of vitality. I heartily recommend that you read Ole Summers’ latest post. It’s an accurate history lesson about the GOP. Given my advancing years, I was witness to everything Ole Summers relates. His post actually made the Main Feed this time. There’s hope for Ricochet yet.

    https://ricochet.com/867947/gop-who-do-you-trust/

    I completely disagree. There was a primary, if that’s what you’re referring to as splitting the party. That’s not splitting. That’s natural. He then unified the party quite easily after the primary. I don’t know what you’re referring to.

    No, I wasn’t referring to the primary. Trump’s approval rating before the election with Republican was north of 90%. I was speaking of the splits in the party that Ole Summers specifically refers to in his post which you should still read if you haven’t. 

    • #93
  4. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    House impeaches.

    House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump:

    Katko (NY)

    Cheney (Wy)

    Kinzinger (Ill)

    Upton (Mich)

    Beautler (Wash)

    Newhouse (Wash)

    Meijer (Mich)

    Rice (SC)

    Gonzalez (Oh)

    Valadao (Cal)

    All Monsters in thrall to the evil that is DC. 

    • #94
  5. Metalheaddoc Member
    Metalheaddoc
    @Metalheaddoc

    So what does the GOP want? A return to loser milquetoast candidates like McCain and Romney? So we can lose gracefully? Trump appealed to minorities to a greater degree than prior Republicans. That all goes away because that was Trump, not the GOPe. 

    • #95
  6. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):
    Is the impeachment all for show? It seems to me they are doing it for two reasons. (1) To force Republicans to defend Trump, and therefore brand the party negatively. (2) Bring in donations from the rapid anti Trump crowd to build up their coffers.

    There are millions of Trump supporters out there who don’t mind one bit being branded. We had plenty of money for the November election, and the impeachment will only inspire us to give more. Our so-called money troubles, I am convinced, stem from the RNC chair having no clue as to how the money should be effectively allocated. We are desperately in need of a better RNC chair who is public relations and tv savvy and is not a relative of Mitt Romney.

    I think it splits the Republicans. Any split is a negative to the party. After supporting him for four years and voting for him twice, I’m done. I can’t tolerate him any more.

    Edit: And let me add, the results in Georgia Senate run off showed how he splits the party.

    Trump didn’t split the party. The party abandoned its constituency.

    He is the only meaningful representation for those who were formerly in an effete and ineffectual and self-interested party machine that only consistently turns its back on its voters.

    Well, I see it as Trump’s behavior split the party. I guess you can’t imagine how his behavior at times repulses people. This is basically why NeverTrumpers exist. You have to be blind to not see them. Of course Trump has split the party. Be honest with the situation or we don’t improve.

    Ronald Reagan split the party. Parties need to be split from time to time. It’s a sign of vitality. I heartily recommend that you read Ole Summers’ latest post. It’s an accurate history lesson about the GOP. Given my advancing years, I was witness to everything Ole Summers relates. His post actually made the

    I completely disagree. There was a primary, if that’s what you’re referring to as splitting the party. That’s not splitting. That’s natural. He then unified the party quite easily after the primary. I don’t know what you’re referring to.

    No, I wasn’t referring to the primary. Trump’s approval rating before the election with Republican was north of 90%. I was speaking of the splits in the party that Ole Summers specifically refers to in his post which you should still read if you haven’t.

    Well that’s not a split party. Differences of opinion are always in any party. The fact that everyone supported and voted for Reagan shows how unified the party was. 

    • #96
  7. CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker
    @CarolJoy

    Jon Gabriel, Ed. (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am sure you are thrilled to be siding with the peole out to destroy our county.

     

    Do you disagree with me that this is all for show?

    Possibly it is for show, I’m not sure that it is. A person can be impeached after they have left office. It doesn’t often happen, but the threat is there.

    In Trump’s case, he can run again in 2024.

    He also stands to lose his 4 year’s worth of pension, and even more importantly, his Secret Services protection.

    The Lefties’ leaders have stated again and again they will be putting everyone in orange jump suits – Trump, Melania, Ivanka and Jared, Don Jr and possibly even Barron.

    All the rest of us have to worry about is going down for some micro aggressive activity that  we as the White Privileged have overlooked until now.

     

     

    • #97
  8. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    Manny (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):
    Is the impeachment all for show? It seems to me they are doing it for two reasons. (1) To force Republicans to defend Trump, and therefore brand the party negatively. (2) Bring in donations from the rapid anti Trump crowd to build up their coffers.

    There are millions of Trump supporters out there who don’t mind one bit being branded. We had plenty …

    I think it splits the Republicans. Any split is a negative to the party. After supporting him for four years and voting for him twice, I’m done. I can’t tolerate him any more.

    Edit: And let me add, the results in Georgia Senate run off showed how he splits the party.

    Trump didn’t split the party. The party abandoned its constituency.

    He is the only meaningful representation for those who were formerly in an effete and ineffectual and self-interested party machine that only consistently turns its back on its voters.

    Well, I see it as Trump’s behavior split the party. I guess you can’t imagine how his behavior at times repulses people. This is basically why NeverTrumpers exist. You have to be blind to not see them. Of course Trump has split the party. Be honest with the situation or we don’t improve.

    Ronald Reagan split the party. Parties need to be split from time to time. It’s a sign of vitality. I heartily recommend that you read Ole Summers’ latest post. It’s an accurate history lesson about the GOP. Given my advancing years, I was witness to everything Ole Summers relates. His post actually made the

    I completely disagree. There was a primary, if that’s what you’re referring to as splitting the party. That’s not splitting. That’s natural. He then unified the party quite easily after the primary. I don’t know what you’re referring to.

    No, I wasn’t referring to the primary. Trump’s approval rating before the election with Republican was north of 90%. I was speaking of the splits in the party that Ole Summers specifically refers to in his post which you should still read if you haven’t.

    Well that’s not a split party. Differences of opinion are always in any party. The fact that everyone supported and voted for Reagan shows how unified the party was.

    Well, it remains to be seen how “split” the Republican Party is post-Trump. You haven’t shown that in any definitive way. Given that Trump grew the party with more minority voters and also grew his vote total some 10+ million since 2016, the loss of NeverTrumpers was negligible if not insignificant, despite how important they claim to be.

    • #98
  9. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    Two of my state’s republican house critters voted for impeachment. This is disgusting. 

    • #99
  10. CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker
    @CarolJoy

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    It is a pity that the Republican leadership objected to the unanimous consent request this morning for the House to consider a Censure Resolution. That could have brought closure.

    A lot of us have had all the closure we need.

    Between Russia Collusion, the charges of our being racists and White Supremacists for supporting Trump, the idea that people with extreme sensitivities should be protected by limiting free speech and also libs desiring to classifying any speech that is not pro-progressive insanity as hate speech, the stolen election and much more have closed the door on many of us ever wanting to look at another Dem or progressive for the rest of our lives.

    • #100
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.