New Website Doxxes Trump Campaign Contributors

 

Allow me to introduce you to a cute little website: Donald Trump Watch.

It’s a website designed to name, shame, intimidate, and target those who have made reportable contributions to the official Trump-Pence campaign account.
I’m on that website.
As a federal campaign election veteran, I knew full well when I made my two contributions that they would be publicly disclosed. I knew the risk that I was taking in doing so. I was also smart enough to list a Post Office Box as my address.
There are no known such sites designed to name, shame, and target Biden supporters, nor should there be. But please disclose it to me if you find one. I am not interested in targeting Biden supporters. This is a free country (for now, at least), and the Supreme Court has long determined that political contributions are speech protected by the First Amendment.

It doesn’t take a Ph.D. to realize the intent. We have seen reports from Kansas City and New Hampshire of warning letters being left on homes of people who have been identified as Trump supporters and warned to make sure their home insurance policies protect them against fire damage.

Don’t believe me? Here’s a story from National Review: Worth your time. And my friend Matt Schlapp has posted threatening fliers (see photo) distributed in a Kansas City neighborhood to those ‘identified’ as Trump supporters. You don’t have to be a contributor to be a target of threatened violence. You just need a yard sign. And people wonder why so many are “silent Trump supporters.”
And people whine about “right-wing” groups threatening violence. Maybe, but the preponderance of evidence seems to point elsewhere.
I’m OK with this. I’m active in politics. I know what it’s like to be a target of doxxing and related threats. I’m at peace, trained, and prepared.
It is not the first time this sleazy tactic has been employed. Democratic US Rep. Joaquin Castro doxxed Trump contributors from his home city of San Antonio in 2019. It has become a common tactic of The Left.
This is evil. And sadly, this is where we are in America right now. Do not be intimidated. Be “wise as serpents,” because that’s what we’re up against.
Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 71 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    How much money do you have to have given to be listed under reportable contributions to the official Trump-Pence campaign account ?

    None.  Actually a penny so that they would have to process it.

    In the Republican Primary, I gave the $2,800 max to Bill Weld, and $1,000 to Mark Sanford before he dropped out. 

    • #61
  2. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    How much money do you have to have given to be listed under reportable contributions to the official Trump-Pence campaign account ?

    None. Actually a penny so that they would have to process it.

    In the Republican Primary, I gave the $2,800 max to Bill Weld, and $1,000 to Mark Sanford before he dropped out.

    That is unscrupulous and [redact]chy. You are a very petty person. 

    • #62
  3. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    TBA (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    How much money do you have to have given to be listed under reportable contributions to the official Trump-Pence campaign account ?

    None. Actually a penny so that they would have to process it.

    In the Republican Primary, I gave the $2,800 max to Bill Weld, and $1,000 to Mark Sanford before he dropped out.

    That is unscrupulous and [redact]chy. You are a very petty person.

    No, I acted tactically.  This is not unlike Rush’s Operation Chaos in 2008, where he urged Republicans to change their party registration, if necessary, to vote for Hillary to prolong the Democratic nomination.  

    • #63
  4. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    No, I acted tactically. This is not unlike Rush’s Operation Chaos in 2008, where he urged Republicans to change their party registration, if necessary, to vote for Hillary to prolong the Democratic nomination.

    None of that means you aren’t petty.

    • #64
  5. OmegaPaladin Moderator
    OmegaPaladin
    @OmegaPaladin

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    David Foster (View Comment):

    There should be no doxxing at Ricochet, and this includes gathering and releasing public information on an individual. If some people wish to be anonymous or semi-anonymous on the site, this should be their right.

    That’s pretty easily done.

    Don’t Use Your Real Name.

    Don’t Give Out Your Real Location.

    Don’t Give Out Your Real Occupation And Location Of Same.

    Don’t Announce Other Things You Do.

    Gary fails on every count.

    This, absolutely. If Gary Robbins had never used his real name (let’s say he was known as Reaganite or Reagan Republican), and someone posted his real name, I would delete the posts immediately and be calling for a ban on the doxxer.

    You see, doxxing is about revealing confidential personal information. Anything made public and tied to the name you use in public is legit. It’s why I use a constant pseudonym. Gary has posted lots of deeply personal information on Ricochet, and regularly included his full name and picture. It’s no different than looking up someone who was on the news.

    That said, personal addresses are not cool even if you supposedly found it online. Those records can be out of date, and can get people killed.

    Fake John Galt and iWe both get on my nerves, and I would never consider doxxing them. Right now, it could be risking their lives and the lives of their families. It’s one of the worst things you can do on the internet, and is criminal in some cases.

    If I had it to do over again, I would not have used my real name. However, I never dreamed that a fellow Ricochetti would have engaged in posting my campaign contributions.

    Likewise, I would never dream of checking out the campaign contributions of of Ricochetti who use their real names, let alone check out the variety of “public“ information such as lawsuits, criminal charges and bankruptcies. I believe that that is beyond the pale and wholly inconsistent with Ricochet being a forum for respectful center-right conversations.

    I do have a question for the mods. If, at this late date, I change my name to “Reagan Republican” would I be entitled to privacy from doxxing?

    Gary,

    Yes, you would, but I do not recommend it.

    I think most people would agree that you have a very distinct writing style.   You have certain signature phrases and references, and are well-known on the site.    If Gary vanishes and Someone appears with the same writing style, it will be about as effective as a toy mustache and glasses.   I don’t think I have ever heard another person use the phrase Reagan Republican besides you.

    If someone compares writing style and says you sound a lot like Gary Robbins, that’s not doxxing since it is based on public info.  Everyone recognizes Pseudodionysus when he shows up, despite using a different wacky name.   If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and flies like a duck, it just might be a duck.

     

    • #65
  6. Gatomal Inactive
    Gatomal
    @Gatomal

    Do you know what is startling? When you start to search areas that you may think are very blue, (SF, Berkeley, Seattle, Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles), it is surprising to me just how many donors there are. Yellow dots are single donations, red are multiples. 

    What surprises me is that I am very Trumpy and highly motivated, but I haven’t donated…so that means donors are even more Trumpy than I am. And there are hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of them. All over Northern California, all over San Jose and Santa Clara and San Francisco and Marin County and Santa Rosa and Napa…there are sure a lot of donors out there. I believe there are a lot more of us than “them”. 

    • #66
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gatomal (View Comment):

    Do you know what is startling? When you start to search areas that you may think are very blue, (SF, Berkeley, Seattle, Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles), it is surprising to me just how many donors there are. Yellow dots are single donations, red are multiples.

    What surprises me is that I am very Trumpy and highly motivated, but I haven’t donated…so that means donors are even more Trumpy than I am. And there are hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of them. All over Northern California, all over San Jose and Santa Clara and San Francisco and Marin County and Santa Rosa and Napa…there are sure a lot of donors out there. I believe there are a lot more of us than “them”.

    Let’s hope that turns out to be the case on Nov 3.  And however long it takes after that, until the Dim stop trying to cheat.

    • #67
  8. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    We need more dark money sources for GOP funds.

    • #68
  9. David Foster Member
    David Foster
    @DavidFoster

    I was just writing about this in a FB post, and noticed that the DonaldTrumpWatch website has changed..it is now called DonorWatch, and provides info on donors to both parties.  Presumably, they are trying to make it look more nonpartisan and less intimidation-focused.

    The original domain name still resolves to it.

    • #69
  10. Matt Balzer, Imperialist Claw Member
    Matt Balzer, Imperialist Claw
    @MattBalzer

    David Foster (View Comment):

    I was just writing about this in a FB post, and noticed that the DonaldTrumpWatch website has changed..it is now called DonorWatch, and provides info on donors to both parties. Presumably, they are trying to make it look more nonpartisan and less intimidation-focused.

    The original domain name still resolves to it.

    Reminds me of the Attack Watch website that popped up early in the Obama administration, where you could report “unfair” attacks on him or his minions. 

    • #70
  11. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    David Foster (View Comment):

    I was just writing about this in a FB post, and noticed that the DonaldTrumpWatch website has changed..it is now called DonorWatch, and provides info on donors to both parties. Presumably, they are trying to make it look more nonpartisan and less intimidation-focused.

    The original domain named  still resolves to it.

    Safe thing to do since we aren’t prone to violence.

    • #71
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.