Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
That was the song we chose for our wedding.
The Concerto in F, like the Second Rhapsody, should be better known. The first Rhapsody is essential for understanding American 20th culture at its boisterous height. The Concerto, banged out a year later (!), is less episodic, and has a killer Adagio that makes the others look like old men lounging in the autumn shade. He orchestrated the whole thing as well, so it’s the first look into the world he heard in his head.
He was the most American composer of them all, and as such I expect he will be gradually deplatformed for cultural appropriation.
Great history, and my personal connection is that Oscar Levant’s daughter was, for a time, my father’s girlfriend, when they were youths in their 50s.
Great story telling (you too Lileks!).
Holy Crow! Did he tell any stories? I always felt bad for Levant – a big, big talent, but no genius, and he knew it. Celebrated for glib quips, knowing it was just froth. Lauded for his piano performances of his friend’s works, knowing he lacked the ability to create them. Feeling pride at landing big movie roles, then watching the roles dry up. Thinking he’d be remembered as a personality more than an artist, but also suspecting that that might carry his artistry over into the future. Suspecting he wasn’t as good as he thought, knowing he was as good as he thought, angry that he was more of a personality than an artist, grateful that he was a personality. No matter what, showing up and doing the work, being Oscar. But not the other famous Oscar. The other quippy sardonic cultured guy with the Oscar name.
And now the radio and the movies, even the library and the newsstand, are being subsumed by the telephone. Television is following them.
Great post, EJ.
Are you sure his name wasn’t Ernest?
Thanks for this EJ. Gershwin framed the American picture of his day with unforgetable music. I am amazed at what he was able to accomplish, a millenial talent.
I did not know this sad end.
I find it easy to identify a piece as having been written by Gershwin, even if I’ve never heard it before. And I swear I hear echoes of the first Rhapsody in the the Concerto.
Honestly, I’m surprised he hasn’t been cancelled for Porgy and Bess.
Gershwin may be the “most American composer,” but I think Copland is a close second.
Everything you say is true.
Porgy and Bess is a masterpiece, we saw it at the Met in late January. I hope the Met will open again someday.
You can play “what if” until the cows come home, but I like to think that, had he lived, the rise of rock’n’roll would have been Gershwin’s liberation from pop music and he would have spent the remainder of his days creating great music for the concert hall.
Speaking of great, Ira had one really great moment left in him. With Harold Arlen he wrote the songs for the Judy Garland version of A Star is Born, including one of the greatest torch songs ever penned, “The Man That Got Away.”
George hated Hollywood, or at least the process of Hollywood, and he wanted to return to New York. He didn’t like the way his songs were presented on film and he lacked the creative control to change that. Sam Goldwyn broke him. During that final film he demanded that Gershwin audition his score to the studio executives like some he was some unknown. Then Goldwyn asked him why he didn’t write hit songs like Irving Berlin.
Ira and his wife remained in Los Angeles and were neighbors to Rosemary Clooney. Much to the chagrin of his wife and neighbors, Ira loved music and insisted on playing it – very loudly. When Rosie’s daughter-in-law, Debbie Boone, was on tour in Japan she purchased a Walkman, then unavailable in the United States. She gifted it to Ira. He was so in love with it he immediately bought stock in Sony.
@jameslileks For my wife and I the choice was Cole Porter and his last pop hit, “True Love,” made famous by Princess Grace and some big eared crooner from the northwest.
I once had discussion with a fellow baby boomer and likewise a big fan of the late, great Frank Zappa. “He is our generation’s George Gershwin,” he declared, alluding to Zappa’s ability to toggle between the worlds of rock and classical music. “Yes,” I replied, “but if only Zappa had the talent and courage to melt people’s hearts with a song like Someone to Watch Over Me.” Like Schubert and Mozart, Gershwin left us far too early. But we still have the music . . .
Maybe that’s why Shall We Dance has always been my favorite Astaire/Rogers film – the Gershwins did the music for it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shall_We_Dance_(1937_film)
For our wedding it was this:
This might be a good member-feed thread – what did you dance to at your wedding?
Well, pitter-patter, let’s get at ‘er!
If Levant ever claimed he wasn’t a genius, he probably did so out of humility. He was a voracious reader, probably blessed with a photographic memory and was a regular on the radio quiz show Information Please where his breadth of knowledge of literature, science, history, philosophy and many other subjects certainly impressed listeners and went well-beyond music. He was a child prodigy at the piano whose technique as an adult other great composers and pianists marveled at including Stravinsky, Artur Rubenstein, and Vladimir Horowitz. And as phenomenal of a pianist as George Gershwin was, after listening to both Gershwin’s and Levant’s renditions of the composer’s own Rhapsody in Blue, I prefer Levant’s. I am somewhat familiar with the piece having listened to my mother play it throughout my young life.
Like many genius-level personalities (the mathematician John Nash, the chess grandmaster Bobby Fisher) Levant was plagued by his own demons, like tridecaphobia. Of course, this irrational fear and his more rational fear of stage fright, he tried to suppress by a combination of drugs to get him up and bring him crashing down after a performance. Oh, that we could have such non-geniuses in our midst today. They would make living through this era in history so much more tolerable.
Thanks, E.J. for the great post.
The stage play of An American in Paris is, of course, much darker than the movie. I believe there’s a federal law that all reworked classics must be darker, grittier and infinitely more depressing than the original.
But there is a line in the play where Adam turns to Jerry and says, “Who do I look like to you? Oscar Levant?” Inevitably there is only one guy in the audience that gets the joke and laughs at it. (Yes, Cleveland, that was me.)
Levant was everything @brianwatt mentions above. He was also the torchbearer for George’s work in the years following his death. He played himself in an awful bio pic of Gershwin made at Warner’s in 1945.
Four years ago, I toured the Wrigley mansion in Phoenix. Wrigley had Steinway and Aeolian build him a custom player piano. Ira Gershwin was a personal friend. During a visit he played Rhapsody in Blue on the piano to “record ” it on the paper scroll for the Wrigley’s. The docents played it for us and I recorded the last 30 seconds on my phone. So here you are, Rhapsody in Blue played by Ira Gershwin.
Oooops! Apparently the type of file I have, m4a, is not allowed to be uploaded.
There is a piano roll of George Gershwin doing Rhapsody in Blue as a piano solo. Around 1980, Columbia filled in the accompaniment holes and Michael Tilson Thomas recorded it with a jazz band. It is surprisingly fast, I wonder if there is a process error.
Every musician is going to have his own take. Sometimes a conductor is more properly thought of as a referee.
Or it is a mechanical limitation. That’s the way it was in the early days of mechanical reproduction of music. Many artists cut versions of “Old Man River” from Showboat as an uptempo fox trot, not because it was artistically correct but the limitations of a 10” 78rpm recording didn’t lend itself to the proper singing of it as a slow lament. Same with piano rolls. Eventually you’re just going to run out of paper.
Afternoon Doctor Robert,
The early versions of Rhapsody in Blue, I have heard are fast, even the ones where George is on the piano. It may be the the concert versions are played slow as a choice. Compare the speed of this early version.
Unfortunately, I never met him. Amanda was quite nice.
Little personal asides are being allowed in this thread, so…
When I read this beautiful story to Kate just now, she reminded me of the following.
At our first son’s wedding reception, someone managed to find Kate somewhere and tell her, “Gigi is looking for you! She’s about to sing a song and she wants you to hear it.”*
That song was Our Love is Here to Stay.
*Gigi was my mom, and in my unbiased view one of the great classical and jazz lyric sopranos of her time. She gave up skyrocketing careers in both art forms to raise a passel of us kids. She remained a popular performer in the Philadelphia area till advanced age.
Every time since I first saw the Wizard of Oz, Judy breaks my heart. Good choice.
No, he played it fast. Most of the versions clock in around 15:50 – 16-30; even accounting for a quick glissando in the opening – no change for a clarinet player to dirty it up – his piano version is about 14:30. Given the work that went into restoring those piano rolls, I trust the speed is accurate.
The rolls can be heard here. They’re remarkable. The original rolls were recorded on a piano player that captured dynamics, which is wild considering the time. A company developed software for translating the holes in the paper into computer code, and outputted the code through a Disklavier. The man comes to life with startling immediacy.
Amen! I have always wondered how loudness was encoded, let alone accurately.
Since the attack and hold info was encoded in the start and end of a hole, and the centerpoint of the hole was needed to encode the choice of key to strike, there is only one dimension left to capture dynamics, I think: the width of the hole.
Was that it? Otherwise, a separate track for dynamics would be needed for each key.
Where, @jameslileks? Did you forget the link?
Aren’t dynamics controlled by the pedals?